The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery

Breast Cancer

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 231-239

  Zhang, Yu ^a   Fukatsu, Hiroshi ^a   Naganawa, Shinji ^a   Satake, Hiroko ^a   Sato, Yasuyuki ^b   Ohiwa, Mikinao ^b   Endo, Tokiko ^b   Ichihara, Shu ^c   Ishigaki, Takeo ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Department of Surgery ^*  (Japan)

^c NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION NAGOYA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conservation surgery; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 0036357505     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: 18804233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02967595     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Nystrom L, Larsson LG, Rutqvist LE, et al: Determination of cause of death among breast cancer cases in the Swedish randomized mammography screening trials. A comparison between official statistics and validation by an endpoint committee. Acta Oncol 34:145-152, 1995.
2. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al: Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trail comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 320:822-828, 1989. (Pubitemid 19094701)
3. Fisher B, Redmond C: Lumpectomy for breast cancer: an update of the NSABP experience. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 11:7-13, 1992.
4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, et al: Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. NEnglJMed 333:1456-1461, 1995.
5. Winchester DP, Cox JD: Standards for diagnosis and management of invasive breast carcinoma. American College of Radiology. American College of Surgeons. College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA CancerJ Clin 48:83-107, 1998. (Pubitemid 28122298)
6. Sarrazin D, Le MG, Arriagada R, et al: Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 14:177-184, 1989. (Pubitemid 19087084)
7. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al: MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493-501, 1993. (Pubitemid 23127861)
8. Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al: Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743-747, 1995.
9. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al: Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115-122, 1995.
10. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, et al: Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 17:110-119, 1999. (Pubitemid 29022384)
11. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E: Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888, 1999.
12. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, et al: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. A JR Am J Roentgenol 169:417-424, 1997. (Pubitemid 27334851)
13. Wendie A, patricia L: Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 214:59-66, 2000.
14. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, 3rd ed, Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
15. Firedrich M, Sickles EA: Radiological diagnosis of breast diseases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1997.
16. Mueller CB: Lumpectomy: Who is eligible? Surgery 100:584-586, 1986.
17. Kurtz JM, Spitalier JM, Amalric R, et al: The prognostic significance of late local recurrence after breastconserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:87-93, 1990. (Pubitemid 20047395)
18. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, et al: Pathologic findings from the National surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity. Cancer 57:1717-1724, 1986. (Pubitemid 16111978)
19. Kraemer O, Andersen M, Siim E: Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30:201-206, 1996. (Pubitemid 26306136)
20. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al: Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190:485-493, 1994. (Pubitemid 24044258)
21. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al: Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrastenhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191:625-631, 1994. (Pubitemid 24177876)
22. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al: MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadoliniumenhanced turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193:777-781, 1994.
23. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al: MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult breast carcinoma. Radiology 205:437-440, 1997.
24. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Gowan KH, et al: Tenyear results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 332:907-911, 1995.
25. Leborgne F, Leborgne JH, Ortega B, et al: Breast conservation treatment of early stage breast cancer: Patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:765-775, 1995.
26. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al: Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomized trails on 1973 patients. Eur J Cancer 31A:1574-1579, 1995.