Hydrophilic aromatic residue and in silico structure for carbohydrate binding module

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Chou, Wei Yao ^a   Pai, Tun Wen ^b   Jiang, Ting Ying ^a   Chou, Wei I ^a,c   Tang, Chuan Yi ^a   Chang, Margareth Dah Tsyr ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c Simpson Biotech Co Ltd   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE BINDING PROTEIN; AMINO ACID; CARBOHYDRATE; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE; BACILLUS; BACTEROIDES OVATUS; BINDING SITE; CATALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROPHILICITY; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SOLANUM; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOBACCO; WASTE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; INTERNET; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; BINDING SITES; CARBOHYDRATES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 80053058792     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024814     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bolam DN, Ciruela A, McQueen-Mason S, Simpson P, Williamson MP, et al. (1998) Pseudomonas cellulose-binding domains mediate their effects by increasing enzyme substrate proximity. Biochem J 331 (Pt 3): 775-781.
2. Tomme P, Warren RA, Gilkes NR, (1995) Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi. Adv Microb Physiol 37: 1-81.
3. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, et al. (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D233-238.
4. Shani N, Shani Z, Shoseyov O, Mruwat R, Shoseyov D, (2011) Oxidized cellulose binding to allergens with a carbohydrate-binding module attenuates allergic reactions. J Immunol 186: 1240-1247.
5. Tomme P, Van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, Van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, et al. (1988) Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. Eur J Biochem 170: 575-581.
6. Gilkes NR, Warren RA, Miller RC Jr, Kilburn DG, (1988) Precise excision of the cellulose binding domains from two Cellulomonas fimi cellulases by a homologous protease and the effect on catalysis. J Biol Chem 263: 10401-10407.
7. Hashimoto H, (2006) Recent structural studies of carbohydrate-binding modules. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 2954-2967.
8. Guillen D, Sanchez S, Rodriguez-Sanoja R, (2010) Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85: 1241-1249.
9. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382: 769-781.
10. Pell G, Williamson MP, Walters C, Du H, Gilbert HJ, et al. (2003) Importance of hydrophobic and polar residues in ligand binding in the family 15 carbohydrate-binding module from Cellvibrio japonicus Xyn10C. Biochemistry 42: 9316-9323.
11. Christiansen C, Abou Hachem M, Janecek S, Vikso-Nielsen A, Blennow A, et al. (2009) The carbohydrate-binding module family 20-diversity, structure, and function. FEBS J 276: 5006-5029.
12. Mitsuoka K, (2011) Obtaining high-resolution images of biological macromolecules by using a cryo-electron microscope with a liquid-helium cooled stage. Micron 42: 100-106.
13. Shin J, Lee W, (2008) Structural proteomics by NMR spectroscopy. Expert Rev Proteomics 5: 589-601.
14. Parker MW, (2003) Protein structure from X-ray diffraction. Journal of Biological Physics 29: 341-362.
15. Oliveira OV, Freitas LC, Straatsma TP, Lins RD, (2009) Interaction between the CBM of Cel9A from Thermobifida fusca and cellulose fibers. J Mol Recognit 22: 38-45.
16. Ginalski K, (2006) Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16: 172-177.
17. Jones D, Thornton J, (1993) Protein fold recognition. J Comput Aided Mol Des 7: 439-456.
18. Bonneau R, Baker D, (2001) Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30: 173-189.
19. Liu T, Tang GW, Capriotti E, (2011) Comparative Modeling: The State of the Art and Protein Drug Target Structure Prediction. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen.
20. Chou WI, Pai TW, Liu SH, Hsiung BK, Chang MD, (2006) The family 21 carbohydrate-binding module of glucoamylase from Rhizopus oryzae consists of two sites playing distinct roles in ligand binding. Biochem J 396: 469-477.
21. Chou WY, Chou WI, Pai TW, Lin SC, Jiang TY, et al. (2010) Feature-incorporated alignment based ligand-binding residue prediction for carbohydrate-binding modules. Bioinformatics 26: 1022-1028.
22. Paldi T, Levy I, Shoseyov O, (2003) Glucoamylase starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger B1: molecular cloning and functional characterization. Biochem J 372: 905-910.
23. Lo HF, Chiang WY, Chi MC, Hu HY, Lin LL, (2004) Site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved threonine, tryptophan, and lysine residues in the starch-binding domain of Bacillus sp. strain TS-23 alpha-amylase. Curr Microbiol 48: 280-284.
24. Boraston AB, Wang D, Burke RD, (2006) Blood group antigen recognition by a Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence factor. J Biol Chem 281: 35263-35271.
25. Watson JN, Newstead S, Dookhun V, Taylor G, Bennet AJ, (2004) Contribution of the active site aspartic acid to catalysis in the bacterial neuraminidase from Micromonospora viridifaciens. FEBS Lett 577: 265-269.
26. Fischer JD, Mayer CE, Soding J, (2008) Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation. Bioinformatics 24: 613-620.
27. King RD, Sternberg MJ, (1996) Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci 5: 2298-2310.
28. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 10915-10919.
29. Gotoh O, (1982) An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences. J Mol Biol 162: 705-708.
30. Larsson P, Wallner B, Lindahl E, Elofsson A, (2008) Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling. Protein Sci 17: 990-1002.
31. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, et al. (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D211-222.
32. Edgar RC, (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 113.
33. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948.
34. Subramanian AR, Kaufmann M, Morgenstern B, (2008) DIALIGN-TX: greedy and progressive approaches for segment-based multiple sequence alignment. Algorithms Mol Biol 3: 6.
35. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J, (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302: 205-217.
36. Do CB, Mahabhashyam MS, Brudno M, Batzoglou S, (2005) ProbCons: Probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 15: 330-340.
37. Katoh K, Toh H, (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9: 286-298.
38. Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ, (2007) ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W407-410.
39. Harata K, Haga K, Nakamura A, Aoyagi M, Yamane K, (1996) X-ray structure of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from alkalophilic Bacillus sp. 1011. Comparison of two independent molecules at 1.8 A resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 52: 1136-1145.
40. Uitdehaag JC, Kalk KH, van Der Veen BA, Dijkhuizen L, Dijkstra BW, (1999) The cyclization mechanism of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase) as revealed by a gamma-cyclodextrin-CGTase complex at 1.8-A resolution. J Biol Chem 274: 34868-34876.
41. Sorimachi K, Le Gal-Coeffet MF, Williamson G, Archer DB, Williamson MP, (1997) Solution structure of the granular starch binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase bound to beta-cyclodextrin. Structure 5: 647-661.
42. Charnock SJ, Bolam DN, Turkenburg JP, Gilbert HJ, Ferreira LM, et al. (2000) The X6 "thermostabilizing" domains of xylanases are carbohydrate-binding modules: structure and biochemistry of the Clostridium thermocellum X6b domain. Biochemistry 39: 5013-5021.
43. Vander Kooi CW, Jusino MA, Perman B, Neau DB, Bellamy HD, et al. (2007) Structural basis for ligand and heparin binding to neuropilin B domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 6152-6157.
44. Bae B, Ohene-Adjei S, Kocherginskaya S, Mackie RI, Spies MA, et al. (2008) Molecular basis for the selectivity and specificity of ligand recognition by the family 16 carbohydrate-binding modules from Thermoanaerobacterium polysaccharolyticum ManA. J Biol Chem 283: 12415-12425.
45. van Bueren AL, Morland C, Gilbert HJ, Boraston AB, (2005) Family 6 carbohydrate binding modules recognize the non-reducing end of beta-1,3-linked glucans by presenting a unique ligand binding surface. J Biol Chem 280: 530-537.
46. Pires VM, Henshaw JL, Prates JA, Bolam DN, Ferreira LM, et al. (2004) The crystal structure of the family 6 carbohydrate binding module from Cellvibrio mixtus endoglucanase 5a in complex with oligosaccharides reveals two distinct binding sites with different ligand specificities. J Biol Chem 279: 21560-21568.
47. Ficko-Blean E, Boraston AB, (2006) The interaction of a carbohydrate-binding module from a Clostridium perfringens N-acetyl-beta-hexosaminidase with its carbohydrate receptor. J Biol Chem 281: 37748-37757.
48. Tung JY, Chang MD, Chou WI, Liu YY, Yeh YH, et al. (2008) Crystal structures of the starch-binding domain from Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase reveal a polysaccharide-binding path. Biochem J 416: 27-36.
49. Boraston AB, Healey M, Klassen J, Ficko-Blean E, Lammerts van Bueren A, et al. (2006) A structural and functional analysis of alpha-glucan recognition by family 25 and 26 carbohydrate-binding modules reveals a conserved mode of starch recognition. J Biol Chem 281: 587-598.