Manipulable objects facilitate cross-modal integration in peripersonal space

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  van Elk, Michiel ^a   Blanke, Olaf ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMB; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; MUSCLE EXCITATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOOTHBRUSH; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052881435     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024641     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Clark A, (2004) Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence Oxford Oxford University Press.
2. Schultz AE, Kuiken TA, (2011) Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: the state of the art and future possibilities. PM R 3: 55-67.
3. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y, (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330.
4. Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C, (2004) Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neurosci Lett 372: 62-67.
5. Holmes NP, Calvert GA, Spence C, (2007) Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Exp Brain Res 183: 465-476.
6. Holmes NP, Sanabria D, Calvert GA, Spence C, (2007) Tool-use: capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex 43: 469-489.
7. Maravita A, Spence C, Kennett S, Driver J, (2002) Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 83: B25-34.
8. Farne A, Ladavas E, (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 11: 1645-1649.
9. Ellis R, Tucker M, (2000) Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol 91 (4): 451-471.
10. Glover S, Rosenbaum DA, Graham J, Dixon P, (2004) Grasping the meaning of words. Exp Brain Res 154: 103-108.
11. Pellegrino JW, Klatzky RL, McCloskey BP, (1989) Timecourse of preshaping for functional responses to objects. J Mot Behav 21: 307-316.
12. Chao LL, Martin A, (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12: 478-484.
13. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6: 231-236.
14. Grezes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham RE, (2003) Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 17: 2735-2740.
15. Kellenbach ML, Brett M, Patterson K, (2003) Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 30-46.
16. Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Vandemaele P, Achten E, (2009) Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. Neuroimage 47: 1832-1843.
17. Handy TC, Grafton ST, Shroff NM, Ketay S, Gazzaniga MS, (2003) Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat Neurosci 6: 421-427.
18. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ, Fortt H, (2006) Action relations, semantic relations, and familiarity of spatial position in Balint's syndrome: crossover effects on perceptual report and on localization. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6: 236-245.
19. Humphreys GW, Wulff M, Yoon EY, Riddoch MJ, (2010) Neuropsychological evidence for visual- and motor-based affordance: effects of reference frame and object-hand congruence. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 36: 659-670.
20. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Edwards S, Baker T, Willson K, (2003) Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci 6: 82-89.
21. Roberts KL, Humphreys GW, (2010) The one that does, leads: action relations influence the perceived temporal order of graspable objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36: 776-780.
22. Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J, (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 39: 580-585.
23. Igarashi Y, Kitagawa N, Spence C, Ichihara S, (2007) Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task. Acta Psychol 124: 190-208.
24. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Bekkering H, (2009) Action semantic knowledge about objects is supported by functional motor activation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35: 1118-1128.
25. Brodeur MB, Dionne-Dostie E, Montreuil T, Lepage M, (2010) The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLoS One 5: e10773.
26. Schicke T, Bauer F, Roder B, (2009) Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand. Exp Brain Res 192: 703-715.
27. Spence C, Kingstone A, Shore DI, Gazzaniga MS, (2001) Representation of visuotactile space in the split brain. Psychol Sci 12: 90-93.
28. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J, (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11: 353-359.
29. Brozzoli C, Cardinali L, Pavani F, Farne A, (2010) Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 48: 796-802.
30. Brozzoli C, Pavani F, Urquizar C, Cardinali L, Farne A, (2009) Grasping actions remap peripersonal space. Neuroreport 20: 913-917.
31. Tucker M, Ellis R, (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol 116: 185-203.
32. Tucker M, Ellis R, (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 830-846.
33. Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W, (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24: 849-878; discussion 878-937.
34. Pulvermuller F, (2005) Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 576-582.
35. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Neggers SF, Bekkering H, (2010) Neural and temporal dynamics underlying visual selection for action. J Neurophysiol 104: 972-983.
36. Fischer MH, Zwaan RA, (2008) Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q J Exp Psychol 61: 825-850.
37. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Zwaan RA, Bekkering H, (2010) The functional role of motor activation in language processing: motor cortical oscillations support lexical-semantic retrieval. Neuroimage 50: 665-677.
38. Helbig HB, Graf M, Kiefer M, (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 174: 221-228.
39. Helbig HB, Steinwender J, Graf M, Kiefer M, (2010) Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 200: 251-258.
40. van Elk M, van Schie HT, Bekkering H, (2009) Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition 111: 72-83.
41. Calvert GA, (2001) Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 11: 1110-1123.
42. Gentile G, Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH, (2011) Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: an FMRI study. J Neurophysiol 105: 910-922.
43. Jacobs S, Danielmeier C, Frey SH, (2010) Human anterior intraparietal and ventral premotor cortices support representations of grasping with the hand or a novel tool. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 2594-2608.
44. Umilta MA, Escola L, Intskirveli I, Grammont F, Rochat M, et al. (2008) When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 2209-2213.
45. Cardinali L, Brozzoli C, Farne A, (2009) Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept? Brain Topogr 21: 252-260.
46. Cardinali L, Frassinetti F, Brozzoli C, Urquizar C, Roy AC, et al. (2009) Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Curr Biol 19: 478-479.
47. Maravita A, Iriki A, (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8: 79-86.
48. de Vignemont F, (2010) Body schema and body image-pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48: 669-680.
49. Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47: 204-211.
50. Kammers MP, Kootker JA, Hogendoorn H, Dijkerman HC, (2010) How many motoric body representations can we grasp? Exp Brain Res 202: 203-212.
51. Gallagher S, (2005) How the body shapes the mind Oxford Oxford University Press.
52. Tsakiris M, Carpenter L, James D, Fotopoulou A, (2010) Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Exp Brain Res 204: 343-352.
53. Kennett S, Spence C, Driver J, (2002) Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Percept Psychophys 64: 1083-1094.
54. Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J, (2000) Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26: 1298-1319.
55. Holmes NP, Spence C, Hansen PC, Mackay CE, Calvert GA, (2008) The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS One 3: e3502.
56. Eimer M, Van Velzen J, Gherri E, Press C, (2007) ERP correlates of shared control mechanisms involved in saccade preparation and in covert attention. Brain Res 1135: 154-166.
57. Jackson SR, Parkinson A, Pears SL, Nam SH, (2011) Effects of motor intention on the perception of somatosensory events: a behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Q J Exp Psychol 64: 839-854.
58. Egly R, Driver J, Rafal RD, (1994) Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J Exp Psychol Gen 123: 161-177.
59. Yantis S, Serences JT, (2003) Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13: 187-193.
60. Bub DN, Masson ME, Cree GS, (2008) Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 106: 27-58.
61. Rueschemeyer SA, van Rooij D, Lindemann O, Willems RM, Bekkering H, (2010) The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci 22: 1844-1851.
62. Salmon JP, McMullen PA, Filliter JH, (2010) Norms for two types of manipulability (graspability and functional usage), familiarity, and age of acquisition for 320 photographs of objects. Behav Res Methods 42: 82-95.