Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 190-208

  Igarashi, Yuka ^a   Kitagawa, Norimichi ^b   Spence, Charles ^c   Ichihara, Shigeru ^a  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crossmodal congruency; Line drawing of a hand; Multisensory interactions; Visuotactile interactions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SEMANTICS; STIMULATION; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; FINGERS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846424213     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Armel K.C., and Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 270 (2003) 1499-1506
2. Austen E.L., Soto-Faraco S., Enns J.T., and Kingstone A. Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 4 (2004) 170-181
3. Botvinick M., and Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (1998) 756
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
5. di Pellegrino G., Làdavas E., and Farnè A. Seeing where your hands are. Nature 388 (1997) 730
6. Driver J. Egocentric and object-based visual neglect. In: Burgess N., Jeffrey K.J., and O'Keefe J. (Eds). The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford 67-89
7. Egly R., Driver J., and Rafal R.D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123 (1994) 161-177
8. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., and Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305 (2004) 875-877
9. Galfano G., and Pavani F. Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows. Experimental Brain Research 166 (2005) 518-527
10. Graziano M.S.A., Gross C.G., Taylor C.S.R., and Moore T. A system of multimodal areas in the primate brain. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford 51-67
11. Holmes N.P., and Spence C. Beyond the body schema: Visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness. In: Knoblich G., Thornton I.M., Grosjean M., and Shiffrar M. (Eds). Human body perception from the inside out (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford 15-64
12. Igarashi Y., Kitagawa N., and Ichihara S. Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 4 (2004) 182-192
13. Kitagawa N., and Spence C. Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect. Experimental Brain Research 161 (2005) 62-71
14. Kitagawa N., Zampini M., and Spence C. Audiotactile interactions in near and far space. Experimental Brain Research 166 (2005) 528-537
15. Ladavas E., and Farnè A. Neuropsychological evidence for multimodal representations of space near specific body parts. In: Spence C., and Driver J. (Eds). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford 69-98
16. Lippa Y., and Adam J.J. An explanation of orthogonal S-R compatibility effects that vary with hand or response position: The end-state comfort hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics 63 (2001) 156-174
17. Maravita A., Spence C., and Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology 13 (2003) R531-R539
18. Maravita A., Spence C., Sergent C., and Driver J. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 350-355
19. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
20. Parsons L.M. Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 178-241
21. Parsons L.M. Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychologica 107 (2001) 155-181
22. Parsons L.M., Fox P.T., Downs J.H., Glass T., Hirsch T.B., Martin C.C., et al. Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375 (1995) 54-58
23. Pavani F., and Castiello U. Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 13-14
24. Pavani F., Spence C., and Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 353-359
25. Pelli D.G. The Video Toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
26. Press C., Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., and Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 238-245
27. Rorden C., Heutink J., Greenfield E., and Robertson I.H. When a rubber hand 'feels' what the real hand cannot. Neuroreport 10 (1999) 135-138
28. Sekiyama K. Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands. Perception and Psychophysics 32 (1982) 89-95
29. Sekiyama K. Mental and physical movements of hands: Kinesthetic information preserved in representational systems. Japanese Psychological Research 25 (1983) 95-102
30. Shore D.I., Barnes M.E., and Spence C. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect. Neuroscience Letters 392 (2006) 96-100
31. Soto-Faraco S., Ronald A., and Spence C. Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contribution of vision and proprioception. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (2004) 1077-1094
32. Soto-Faraco S., Sinnett S., Alsius A., and Kingstone A. Spatial orienting of tactile attention induced by social cues. Psychonomic Bulletin, and Review 12 (2005) 1024-1031
33. Spence C., Kingstone A., Shore D.I., and Gazzaniga M.S. Representation of visuotactile space in the split-brain. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 90-93
34. Spence C., Pavani F., and Driver J. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile crossmodal distractor congruency effects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 4 (2004) 148-169
35. Spence C., Pavani F., Maravita A., and Holmes N. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Journal of Physiology 98 (2004) 175-189
36. Thomas R., Press C., and Haggard P. Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychologica 121 (2006) 317-330
37. Tipper S.P., Lloyd D., Shorland B., Dancer C., Howard L.A., and McGlone F. Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 1741-1744
38. Tipper S.P., Phillips N., Dancer C., Lloyd D., Howard L.A., and McGlone F. Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly. Experimental Brain Research 139 (2001) 160-167
39. Tomasino B., Rumiati R.I., and Umilta C.A. Selective deficit of motor imagery as tapped by a left-right decision of visually presented hands. Brain and Cognition 53 (2003) 376-380
40. Townsend J.T., and Ashby F.G. Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In: Castellan N.J., and Restle F. (Eds). Cognitive theory Vol. 3 (1978), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 199-239
41. Tsakiris M., and Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 80-91
42. Walton M., and Spence C. Cross-modal congruency and visual capture in a visual elevation discrimination task. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 113-120