The one that does, leads: Action relations influence the perceived temporal order of graspable objects

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 776-780

  Roberts, Katherine L ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action; Affordance; Perception; Temporal order judgments

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955541250     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018739     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
2. Deubel H., Schneider W.X., Paprotta I. Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanisms in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:81-107.
3. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Grèzes J., Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:212-222.
5. Green C., Hummel J.E. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1107-1119.
6. Handy T.C., Grafton S.T., Shroff N.M., Ketay S., Gazzaniga M.S. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:421-427.
7. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. How to define an object: Evidence from the effects of action on perception and attention. Mind & Language 2007, 22:534-547.
8. Linnell K.J., Humphreys G.W., McIntyre D.B., Laitinen S., Wing A.M. Action modulates object-based selection. Vision Research 2005, 45:2268-2286.
9. Nicol J.R., Shore D.I. Perceptual grouping impairs temporal resolution. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183:141-148.
10. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Edwards S., Baker T., Willson K. Seeing the action: Neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:82-89.
11. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Hickman M., Clift J., Daly A., Colin J. I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:583-605.
12. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltà C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:31-40.
13. Rorden C., Mattingley J.B., Karnath H.-O., Driver J. Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:421-433.
14. Shore D.I., Spence C., Klein R.M. Visual prior entry. Psychological Science 2001, 12:205-212.
15. Tipper S.P., Paul M.A., Hayes A.E. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:493-498.
16. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
17. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:1293-1313.