Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments?

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 349-370

  Ke, Fengfeng ^a   Chávez, Alicia F ^b   Causarano, Pei Ni L ^b   Causarano, Antonio ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Identity presence; Online discourse analysis; Online knowledge building

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052635371     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-011-9114-z     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity theory. New York: Harvester.
2. Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Munch, R., & Smelser, N. J. (Eds.). (1987). The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Amelung, C. (2007). Using social context and e-learner identity as a framework for an e-learning notification system. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(4), 501-517.
4. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Retrieved March 13, 2010, from http://www. aln. org/alnweb/journal/jalnvol5issue2v2. htm.
5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
7. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.
8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.
9. Brown, S. J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
10. Burke, K. (1940). The Philosophy of Literary Form. Berkley: University of California Press.
11. Burkhalter, B. (1999). Reading race online: Discovering racial identity in Usenet discussions. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 60-75). New York: Routledge.
12. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
13. Chester, A., & O'Hara, A. (2007). Image and identity in online discussions: The role of pseudonymity in education. International Journal of Learning, 13(12), 193-204.
14. Coutu, L. M. (2000). Communication codes of rationality and spirituality in the discourse of and about Robert S. McNamara's in retrospect. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(2), 179-211.
15. Crichton, S., & Kinsel, E. (2003). Learning plans as support for the development of learner identity: A case study in rural western Canada. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 8(2), 213-226.
16. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
17. Duff, P. A., & Uchida, Y. (1997). The negotiation of teachers' sociocultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 451-486.
18. Ellinger, A. D., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2005). Case study research methods. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 327-350). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
19. Fairclough, N. (1992). Communication and social change. London: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fischer, F., & Weinberger, A. (2005). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computer and Education, 46(1), 71-95.
21. Freeman, M., & Bamford, A. (2004). Student choice of anonymity for learner identity in online learning discussion forums. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(3), 45-53.
22. Freeman, M. A., & Capper, J. M. (1999). Exploiting the web for education: An anonymous asynchronous role simulation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 95-116.
23. Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, T. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
24. Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
25. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, J. F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
27. Gunawardena, C. N., Constance, A. L., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431.
28. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of an on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
29. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden Papers (pp. 117-136). Berlin: Springer.
30. Hirano, E. (2009). Learning difficulty and learner identity: A symbiotic relationship. ELT Journal, 63(1), 33-41.
31. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cornell University Press.
32. Howe, C., & Tolmie, A. (1999). Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science. In K. Littleton (Ed.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 24-45). New York: Routledge.
33. Hughes, G. (2007). Diversity, identity and belonging in e-learning communities: Some theories and paradoxes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5-6), 707-718.
34. Hunt, R. (1999). Affordances and constraints of electronic discussions. New Brunswick: ED454508.
35. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.
36. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
37. Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808-820.
38. Ke, F., & Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 136-145.
39. Knorr-Cetina, K., & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.). (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
40. Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
41. Laffey, J., Lin, G. Y., & Lin, Y. (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 163-177.
42. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publication.
44. Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2006). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23-40.
45. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
46. Marx, G. T. (1999). What's in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. Information Society, 15, 99-112.
47. Mercer, N., & Hall, H. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1-14.
48. Meyer, K. A. (2010). A study of online discourse at The Chronicle of Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 143-160.
49. Michinov, N., Michinov, E., & Toczek-Capelle, M. C. (2004). Social identity, group processes and performances in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Dynamics Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 27-39.
50. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publications.
51. Nichani, M. (2000). Differentiating between Communities of Practices (CoPs) and Quasi-Communities: Can CoPs exist online? International Journal on E-Learning, 1(3), 23-29.
52. O'Neill, S., & O'Neill, S. (2008). Interactive media: The semiotics of embodied interaction. London: Springer.
53. Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4): 227-241.
54. Pallof, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Continuum.
56. Paulemon, L. P. (2008). Second Life: Personality - Identity - Avatars. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, & T. Reynolds (Eds.), World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education: Proceedings E-Learn Las Vegas 2008 (pp. 3494-3498). Chesapeake: AACE.
57. Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., Jr., & Grant, A. E. (2003). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. London: Routledge.
58. Rose, M., & McClafferty, K. A. (2001). A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 27-33.
59. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
60. Scollon, W. S. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. London: Routledge.
61. Shepherd, D. (2009). Dialogism. In P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid, & J. Schönert (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 74-79). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
62. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
63. Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The Relationship of social presence and interaction in online Classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
64. Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25-65). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
65. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
66. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. California.