Hybridization, species collapse, and species reemergence after disturbance to premating mechanisms of reproductive isolation

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2592-2605

  Gilman, Robert Tucker ^a   Behm, Jocelyn E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybridization; Models simulations; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; HOMOGENEITY; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HYBRIDIZATION; LONG-TERM CHANGE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; STOCHASTICITY; SWARMING; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FISH; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; PLANT; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICS; SYMPATRY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; FISHES; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SYMPATRY;

EID: 80052265187     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01320.x     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Albertson, R. C., J. T. Streelman, T. D. Kocher, and P. C. Yelick. 2005. Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16287-16292.
2. Allendorf, F. W., R. F. Leary, P. Spruell, and J. K. Wenburg. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:613-622.
3. Behm, J. E., A. R. Ives, and J. W. Boughman. 2010. Breakdown in postmating isolation and collapse of a species pait through hybridization. Am. Nat. 175:11-26.
4. Bettles, C. M., M. F. Docker, B. Dufour, and D. D. Heath. 2005. Hybridization dynamics between sympatric species of trout: loss of reproductive isolation. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1220-1233.
5. Bolnick, D. I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58:895-899.
6. Bolnick, D. I. 2006. Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 241:734-744.
7. Bolnick, D. I., and M. Doebeli. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433-2449.
8. Bulmer, M. G. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
9. Burger, R., and K. A. Schneider. 2006. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating. Am. Nat. 167:190-205.
10. Burger, R., K. A. Schneider, and M. Willensdorfer. 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60:2185-2206.
11. Cade, T. J. 1983. Hybridization and gene exchange among birds in relation to conservation. Pp. 288-309 in C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde and W. L. Thomas, eds. Genetics and conservation. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
12. Cooper, I. A., R. T. Gilman, and J. W. Boughman. Sexual dimorphism and speciation on two different ecological coins: patterns from nature and theoretical predictions. Evolution. In press.
13. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
14. de Cara, M. A. R., N. H. Barton, and M. Kirkpatrick. 2008. A model for the evolution of assortative mating. Am. Nat. 171:580-596.
15. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
16. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156 (Suppl):S77-S101.
17. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2003. Seciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421:259-264.
18. Doebeli, M., H. J. Blok, O. Leimar, and U. Dieckmann. 2007. Multimodal pattern formation in phenotype distributions of sexual populations. Proc. R. Soc. B 274:274-285.
19. Dowling, T. E., and M. R. Childs. 1992. Impact of hybridization on a threatened trout of the southwestern United States. Conserv. Biol. 6:355-364.
20. Echelle, A. A., and P. J. Connor. 1989. Rapid, geographically extensive introgression after secondary contact between 3 pupfish species (Cyprinodon, Cyprinodontidae). Evolution 43:717-727.
21. Epifanio, J., and D. Philipp. 2000. Simulating the extinction of parental lineages from introgressive hybridization: the effects of fitness, initial proportions of parental taxa, and mate choice. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10:339-354.
22. Feldman, M. W. 1972. Selection for linkage modification: I. Random mating populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2:299-318.
23. Fitzpatrick, B. M., J. A. Fordyce, and S. Gavrilets. 2009. Pattern, process and geographic modes of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 22:2342-2347.
24. Foster, S. A., J. A. Baker, and M. A. Bell. 2003. The case for conserving threespine stickleback populations: protecting an adaptive radiation. Fisheries 28:10-18.
25. Gavrilets, S. 2005. "Adaptive speciation"- It is not that easy: a reply to Doebeli et al. Evolution 59:696-699.
26. Gavrilets, S., and A. Vose. 2005. Dynamic patterns of adaptive radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:18040-18045.
27. Gavrilets, S., and A. Vose. 2009. Dynamic patterns of adaptive radiation: evolution of mating preferences. Pp. 102-126 in R. K. Butlin, J. R. Bridle and D. Schluter, eds. Speciation and patterns of diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Gavrilets, S., A. Vose, M. Barluenga, W. Salzburger, and A. Meyer. 2007. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 1. Cichlids in a crater lake. Mol. Ecol. 16:2893-2909.
29. Gow, J. L., C. L. Peichel, and E. B. Taylor. 2006. Contrasting hybridization rates between sympatric three-spined sticklebacks highlight the fragility of reproductive barriers between evolutionarily young species. Mol. Ecol. 15:739-752.
30. Grant, B. R., and P. R. Grant. 1993. Evolution of Darwin finches caused by a rare climatic event. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251:111-117.
31. Grant, B. R., and P. R. Grant. 2008. Fission and fusion of Darwin's finches populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363:2821-2829.
32. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 1996. Speciation and hybridization in island birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351:765-772.
33. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 2010. Conspecific versus heterospecific gene exchange between populations of Darwin's finches. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 365:1065-1076.
34. Gray, S. M., L. M. Dill, F. Y. Tantu, E. R. Loew, F. Herder, and J. S. McKinnon. 2008. Environment-contingent sexual selection in a colour polymorphic fish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275:1785-1791.
35. Haesler, M. P., and O. Seehausen. 2005. Inheritance of female mating preference in a sympatric sibling species pair of Lake Victoria cichlids: implications for speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:237-245.
36. Hawkins, D. K., and C. J. Foote. 1998. Early survival and development of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki clarki), steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and reciprocal hybrids. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55:2097-2104.
37. Hendry, A. P., P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, H. A. Ford, M. J. Brewer, and J. Podos. 2006. Possible human impacts on adaptive radiation: beak size bimodality in Darwin's finches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:1887-1894.
38. Henry, C. S., M. L. M. Wells, and K. E. Holsinger. 2002. The inheritance of mating songs in two cryptic, sibling lacewing species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Genetica 116:269-289.
39. Hubbard, A. L., S. McOrist, T. W. Jones, R. Boid, R. Scott, and N. Easterbee. 1992. Is survival of European wildcats Felis silvestris in Britain threatened by interbreeding with domestic cats. Biol. Conserv. 61:203-208.
40. Ispolatov, J., and M. Doebeli. 2009. Diversification along environmental gradients in spatially structured populations. Evol. Ecol. Res. 11:295-301.
41. Karlin, S., and J. McGregor. 1974. Towards a theory of evolution of modifier genes. Theor. Popul. Biol. 5:59-103.
42. Kitano, J., S. Mori, and C. L. Peichel. 2008. Divergence of male courtship displays between sympatric forms of anadromous threespine stickleback. Behaviour 145:443-461.
43. Kraak, S. B. M., B. Mundwiler, and P. J. B. Hart. 2001. Increased number of hybrids between benthic and limnetic three-spined sticklebacks in Enos Lake, Canada; the collapse of a species pair? J. Fish Biol. 58:1458-1464.
44. Lamb, T., and J. C. Avise. 1986. Directional introgression of mitochondrial DNA in a hybrid population of tree frogs - The influence of mating behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:2526-2530.
45. Lamont, B. B., T. He, N. J. Enright, S. L. Krauss, and B. P. Miller. 2003. Anthropogenic disturbance promotes hybridization between Banksia species by altering their biology. J. Evol. Biol. 16:551-557.
46. Matsubayashi, K. W., and H. Katakura. 2009. Contribution of multiple isolating barriers to reproductive isolation between a pair of phytophagous ladybird beetles. Evolution 63:2563-2580.
47. McPhail, J. D. 1984. Ecology and evolution of sympatric stickleback (Gasterosteus) - Morphological and genetic evidence for a species pair in Enos Lake, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 62:1402-1408.
48. McPhail, J. D. 1992. Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus)-Evidence for a species pair in Paxton Lake, Texada Island, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 70:361-369.
49. Mecham, J. S. 1960. Introgressive hybridization between two southern treefrogs. Evolution 14:445:457.
50. Mercader, R. J., M. L. Aardema, and J. M. Scriber. 2009. Hybridization leads to host-use divergence in a polyphagous butterfly sibling species pair. Oecologia 158:651-662.
51. Nei, M. 1967. Modification of linkage intensity by natural selection. Genetics 57:625-626.
52. Niemiller, M. L., B. M. Fitzpatrick, and B. T. Miller. 2008. Recent divergence with gene flow in Tennessee cave salamanders (Plethodontidae: Gyrinophilus) inferred from gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 17:2258-2275.
53. Otto, S. P., M. R. Servedio, and S. L. Nuismer. 2008. Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics 179:2091-2112.
54. Pennings, P. S., M. Kopp, G. Meszena, U. Dieckmann, and J. Hermisson. 2008. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. Am. Nat. 171:E44-E71.
55. Polechova, J., and N. H. Barton. 2005. Speciation through competition: a critical review. Evolution 59:1194-1210.
56. Rhymer, J. M., and D. Simberloff. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:83-109.
57. Rhymer, J. M., M. J. Williams, and M. J. Braun. 1994. Mitochondrial analysis of gene flow between New Zealan mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and grey ducks (A. superciliosa). Auk 111:970-978.
58. Ribeiro, F., and N. Caticha. 2009. Emergence and loss of assortative mating in sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 258:465-477.
59. Rundle, H. D. 2002. A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 56:322-329.
60. Sadedin, S., J. Hollander, M. Panova, K. Johannesson, and S. Gavrilets. 2009. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 3: ecotype formation in a Swedish snail. Mol. Ecol. 18:4006-4023.
61. Samonte, I. E., Y. Satta, A. Sato, H. Tichy, N. Takahata, and J. Klein. 2007. Gene flow between species of Lake Victoria haplochromine fishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2069-2080.
62. Savolainen, V., M. C. Anstett, C. Lexer, I. Hutton, J. J. Clarkson, M. V. Norup, M. P. Powell, D. Springate, N. Salamin, and W. J. Baker. 2006. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441:210-213.
63. Schlefer, E. K., M. A. Romano, S. I. Guttman, and S. B. Ruth. 1986. Effects of 20 years of hybridization in a disturbed habitat on Hyla cinerea and Hyla gratiosa. J. Herpetol. 20:210-221.
64. Schluter, D. 1995. Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks - Trade-offs in feeding performance and growth. Ecology 76:82-90.
65. Seehausen, O. 2006. Conservation: losing biodiversity by reverse speciation. Curr. Biol. 16:R334-R337.
66. Seehausen, O., and J. J. M. van Alphen. 1998. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42:1-8.
67. Seehausen, O., J. J. M. vanAlphen, and F. Witte. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277:1808-1811.
68. Seehausen, O., G. Takimoto, D. Roy, and J. Jokela. 2008a. Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Mol. Ecol. 17:30-44.
69. Seehausen, O., Y. Terai, I. S. Magalhaes, K. L. Carleton, H. D. J. Mrosso, R. Miyagi, I. van der Sluijs, M. V. Schneider, M. E. Maan, H. Tachida, H. Imai, and N. Okada. 2008b. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455:620-626.
70. Stelkens, R. B., M. E. R. Pierotti, D. A. Joyce, A. M. Smith, I. van der Sluijs, and O. Seehausen. 2008. Disruptive sexual selection on male nuptial coloration in an experimental hybrid population of cichlid fish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363:2861-2870.
71. Streelman, J. T., R. C. Albertson, and T. D. Kocher. 2003. Genome mapping of the orange blotch colour pattern in cichlid fishes. Mol. Ecol. 12:2465-2471.
72. Taylor, E. B., J. W. Boughman, M. Groenenboom, M. Sniatynski, D. Schluter, and J. L. Gow. 2006. Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Mol. Ecol. 15:343-355.
73. Thibert-Plante, X., and A. P. Hendry. 2009. Five questions on ecological speciation addressed with individual-based simulations. J. Evol. Biol. 22:109-123.
74. Thibert-Plante, X., and A. P. Hendry. 2011. The consequences of phenotypic plasticity for ecological speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 24:326-342.
75. Todd, T. N., and R. M. Stedman. 1989. Hybridization of ciscoes (Coregonus spp) in Lake Huron. Can. J. Zool. 67:1679-1685.
76. Vamosi, S. M., and D. Schluter. 1999. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 53:874-879.
77. van der Sluijs, I., J. J. M. van Alphen, and O. Seehausen. 2008a. Preference polymorphism for coloration but no speciation in a population of Lake Victoria cichlids. Behav. Ecol. 19:177-183.
78. van der Sluijs, I., T. J. M. Van Dooren, K. D. Hofker, J. J. M. van Alphen, R. B. Stelkens, and O. Seehausen. 2008b. Female mating preference functions predict sexual selection against hybrids between sibling species of cichlid fish. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363:2871-2877.
79. van der Sluijs, I., T. J. M. Van Dooren, O. Seehausen, and J. J. M. van Alphen. 2008c. A test of fitness consequences of hybridization in sibling species of Lake Victoria cichlid fish. J. Evol. Biol. 21:480-491.
80. van der Sluijs, I., O. Seehausen, T. J. M. Van Dooren, and J. J. M. van Alphen. 2010. No evidence for a genetic association between female mating preference and male secondary sexual trait in a Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Curr. Zool. 56:57-64.
81. van Doorn, G. S., U. Dieckmann, and F. J. Weissing. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. Am. Nat. 163:709-725.
82. Verschuren, D., T. C. Johnson, H. J. Kling, D. N. Edgington, P. R. Leavitt, E. T. Brown, M. R. Talbot, and R. E. Hecky. 2002. History and timing of human impact on Lake Victoria, East Africa. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:289-294.
83. Wiegand, K. M. 1935. A taxonomist's experience with hybrids in the wild. Science 81:161-166.
84. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15:323-354.