A model for the evolution of assortative mating

American Naturalist

Volumn 171, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 580-596

  De Cara, M A R ^a   Barton, N H ^a   Kirkpatrick, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Disruptive selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; EPISTASIS; FITNESS; NATURAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; MATE CHOICE; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HAPLOIDY; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA;

EID: 42549103811     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/587062     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barton, N. H. 1995. Evolution of recombination. Genetical Research 65:123-145.
2. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1991. Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127:229-255.
3. Bolnick, D. I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58: 895-899.
4. Bürger, R., and K. A. Schneider. 2006. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating. American Naturalist 167:190-205.
5. Bürger, R., K. A. Schneider, and M. Willensdorfer. 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60:2185-2206.
6. Cain, M., V. Andreasen, and D. Howard. 1999. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53:1343-1353.
7. Charlesworth, D., M. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469-1489.
8. Coyne, J., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
9. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
10. Diehl, S., and G. Bush. 1989. The role of habitat preference on adaptation and speciation. Pages 345-365 in D. Otte and J. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
11. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9:893-909.
12. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist 156(suppl.):S77-S101.
13. Drossel, B., and A. McKane. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetic models. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204:467-478.
14. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
16. Fisher, R. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52:399-433.
17. Fry, J. 2003. Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush versus Rice versus Felsenstein. Evolution 57:1735-1746.
18. Gavrilets, S. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
19. Gavrilets, S., and C. R. Boake. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. American Naturalist 152:706-716.
20. Karlin, S., and J. McGregor. 1974. Towards a theory of the evolution of modifier genes. Theoretical Population Biology 5:59-103.
21. Kingsolver, J., H. Hoekstra, J. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. Vignieri, C. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
22. Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267:1649-1655.
23. Kirkpatrick, M., and S. Nuismer. 2004. Sexual selection can constraint sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:687-693.
24. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159(suppl.):S22-S35.
25. Kirkpatrick, M., T. Johnson, and N. H. Barton. 2002. General models of multilocus evolution. Genetics 161:1727-1750.
26. Kondrashov, A., and F. Kondrashov. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351-354.
27. Kondrashov, A., and M. Shpak. 1998. On the origin of species by means of assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265:2273-2278.
28. Matessi, C., A. Gimelfarb, and S. Gavrilets. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2:41-64.
29. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. American Naturalist 100:637-650.
30. Pennings, P. S., M. Kopp, G. Meszéna, U. Dieckmann, and J. Hermisson. 2008. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. American Naturalist 171:E44-E71.
31. Polechova, J., and N. Barton. 2005. Speciation through competition: a critical reevaluation. Evolution 59:1194-1210.
32. Rice, W. 1984. Disruptive selection on habitat preference and the evolution of reproductive isolation: a simulation study. Evolution 38:1251-1260.
33. Sanderson, N. 1989. Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution 43:1223-1235.
34. Sawyer, S., and D. Hartl. 1981. On the evolution of behavioral reproductive isolation: the Wallace effect. Theoretical Population Biology 19:261-273.
35. Schneider, K. A., and R. Bürger. 2005. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:570-588.
36. Servedio, M. R. 2000. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54:21-29.