Emergence and loss of assortative mating in sympatric speciation

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 258, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 465-477

  Ribeiro, Fabiano ^a   Caticha, Nestor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Evolution of assortative mating; Phase transitions; Reproductive isolation; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; CARRYING CAPACITY; EMERGENCE; EXTINCTION; FITNESS; HYSTERESIS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; MATING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL TRAIT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVOLUTION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; HETEROZYGOTE; HOMOZYGOTE; HYSTERESIS; PHASE TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SYMPATRY;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 67349136373     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bolnick D.I., and Fitzpatrick B. Sympatric speciation: theory and empirical data. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38 (2007) 459-487
2. Dieckmann U., and Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400 (1999) 354
3. Doebeli M. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. Evolutionary Biology 9 (1996) X93-909
4. Doebeli M. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker trait. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18 (2005) 1587-1600
5. Drossel B., and Mackane A. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetic models. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204 (2000) 467-478
6. Fry J. Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: bush versus rice versus felsenstein. Evolution 57 8 (2003) 1735-1746
7. Gavrilets S. Models of speciation: What have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution 57 (2003) 2197-2215
8. Gavrilets S., and Hastings A. Intermittency and transient chaos from simple frequency-dependent selection. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 261 1361 (1995) 233-238
9. Geritz, S., Kisdi, E., 2000. Adaptative Dynamics in Diploid, Sexual Populations and the Evolution of Reproductive Isolation. The Royal Society of London, p. 1671.
10. Gow J., Peichel C., and Taylor E. Contrasting hybridization rates between sympatric three-spined sticklebacks highlight the fragility of reproductive barriers between evolutionarily young species. Molecular Ecology 15 3 (2006) 739-752
11. Hatfield T., and Schluter D. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53 3 (1999) 866-873
12. Higashi M., Takimoto G., and Yamamura N. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402 (1999) 523
13. Kirkpatrick M., and Ravigne V. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159 (2002) S22
14. Kondrashov A. Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. III. Computer simulations. Theoretical Population Biology 29 (1986) 1-15
15. Kondrashov A., and Kondrashov F. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400 (1999) 351
16. Kraak S., Mundwiler B., and Hart P. Increased number of hybrids between benthic and limnetic three-spined sticklebacks in Enos Lake, Canada; the collapse of a species pair?. Journal of Fish Biology 58 5 (2001) 1458-1464
17. Luz-Burgoa K., Moss de Oliveira S., Schwammle V., and Sa Martins J.S. Thermodynamic behavior of a phase transition in a model for sympatric speciation. Physical Review E 74 (2006) 021910
18. Maynard Smith J. Sympatric speciation. The American Naturalist 100 (1966) 637-650
19. Nagel L., and Schluter D. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52 1 (1998) 209-218
20. Noor M.A.F. Absence of species discrimination in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis males. Animal Behavior 52 (1996) 1205-1210
21. Ortiz-Barrientos D., Counterman B.A., and Noor M.A.F. The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS Biology 2 12 (2004) e416
22. Peichel C.L., Nereng K.S., Ohgi K.A., Cole B.L., Colosimo P.F., Buerkle C.A., Schluter D., and Kingsley D.M. The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414 6866 (2001) 901-905
23. Pennings P.S., Kopp M., Meszéna G., Dieckmann U., and Hermisson J. An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. The American Naturalist 171 1 (2008) E44
24. Rosenzweig M.L. Competitive speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (London) 10 (1978) 275-289
25. Schluter D., and McPhail J. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. American Naturalist 140 (1992) 85
26. Seehausen O., Alphen J., and Witte F. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277 5333 (1997) 1808-1811
27. Tauber C., and Tauber J. Phenotypic plasticity in chrysoperla: genetic variation in the sensory mechanism and in correlated reproductive traits. Evolution 46 (1992) 1754-1773
28. Taylor E., Boughman J., Groenenboom M., Sniatynski M., Schluter D., and Gow L. Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Molecular Ecology 15 2 (2006) 343-355
29. Udovic D. Frequency-dependent selection, disruptive selection, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. The American Naturalist 116 5 (1980)
30. Walsh B.J. On phytophagous varieties and phytophagous species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society (Philadelphia) 3 (1864) 403-430
31. Yeomans J.M. Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions (1994), Clarendon Press, Oxford