The inheritance of mating songs in two cryptic, sibling lacewing species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla)

Genetica

Volumn 116, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 269-289

  Henry, Charles S ^a   Wells, Marta Lucía Martínez ^a   Holsinger, Kent E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Chrysoperla; Chrysopidae; Cryptic species; Evolution; Genetics; Insect; Neuroptera; Premating isolation; Reproductive isolation; Sexual selection; Songs; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CROSSES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; INSECTS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

CHRYSOPERLA; CHRYSOPERLA JOHNSONI; CHRYSOPERLA PLORABUNDA; CHRYSOPIDAE; INSECTA; NEUROPTERA;

EID: 0036874585     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021240611362     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Allan, S.E. & A.M. Simmons, 1994. Temporal features mediating call recognition in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: amplitude modulation. Anim. Behav. 47: 1073-1086.
2. Arnqvist, G., M. Edvardsson, U. Friberg & T. Nilsson, 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10460-10464.
3. Ayala, G.J. & M.L. Tracey, 1974. Genetic differentiation within and between species of the Drosophila willistoni group. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 999-1003.
4. Barraclough, T.G., P.H. Harvey & S. Nee, 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 259: 211-215.
5. Barraclough, T.G. & A.P. Vogler, 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155: 419-434.
6. Bearder, S.K., 1999. Physical and social diversity among nocturnal primates: a new view based on long term research. Primates 40: 267-282.
7. Boake, C.R.B., 2000. Flying apart: mating behavior and speciation. Bioscience 50: 501-508.
8. Boughman, J.W., 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-948.
9. Bridle, J.R. & M.G Ritchie, 2001. Assortative mating and the genic view of speciation - commentary. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 878-879.
10. Bulmer, M.G., 1985. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
11. Butlin, R.K., 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation, pp. 158-179 in Speciation and Its Consequences, edited by D. Otte & J.A. Endler. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
12. Carson, H.L., 1997. Sexual selection: a driver of genetic change in Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Hered. 88: 343-352.
13. Castle, W.E., 1921. An improved method of estimating the number of genetic factors concerned in cases of blending inheritance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 6904-6907.
14. Civetta, A. & R.S. Singh, 1998a. Sex and speciation: genetic architecture and evolutionary potential of sexual versus nonsexual traits in the sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Evolution 52: 1080-1092.
15. Civetta, A. & R.S. Singh, 1998b. Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 901-909.
16. Cockerham, C.C., 1986. Modifications in estimating the number of genes for a quantitative character. Genetics 114: 659-664.
17. Coyne, J.A. & H.A. Orr, 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51: 295-303.
18. Danley, P.D. & T.D. Kocher, 2001. Speciation in rapidly diverging systems: lessons from Lake Malawi. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1075-1086.
19. Darwin, C., 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Modern Library, New York, NY.
20. Doherty, J.A., 1985. Trade off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 156: 787-801.
21. Doolan, J.M. & X. Young, 1989. Relative importance of song parameters during flight phonotaxis and courtship in the bladder cicada Cystosoma saundersii. J. Exp. Biol. 141: 113-131.
22. Endler, J.A., 1993. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 340: 215-225.
23. Fisher, R.A., 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Dover Press, New York, NY, 2nd edn.
24. Gavrilets, S., G. Arnqvist & U. Friberg, 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 531-539.
25. Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449-14454.
26. Hatfield, T. & D. Schluter, 1999, Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53: 866-873.
27. Hendry, A.P., 2001. Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 112: 515-534.
28. Henry, C.S., 1979. Acoustical communication during courtship and mating in the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 68-79.
29. Henry, C.S., 1980a. The courtship call of Chrysopa downesi Banks [sic] (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): its evolutionary significance. Psyche 86: 291-297.
30. Henry, C.S., 1980b. The importance of low-frequency, substrate-borne sounds in lacewing communication (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 617-621.
31. Henry, C.S., 1983. Temperature-induced changes in the calls of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Psyche 90: 343-360.
32. Henry, C.S., 1985. Sibling species, call differences, and speciation in green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Evolution 39: 965-984.
33. Henry, C.S., 1993. Chrysoperla johnsoni Henry (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): acoustic evidence for full species status. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 14-25.
34. Henry, C.S., M.M. Wells & R.J. Pupedis, 1993. Hidden taxonomic diversity within Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): two new species based on courtship songs. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 1-13.
35. Henry, C.S., S.J. Brooks, J.B. Johnson & P. Duelli, 1996. Chrysoperla lucasina (Lacroix): a distinct species of green lacewing, confirmed by acoustical analysis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Syst. Entomol. 21: 205-218.
36. Henry, C.S., M.L.M. Wells & C.M. Simon, 1999. Convergent evolution of courtship songs among cryptic species of the carnea-group of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Evolution 53: 1165-1179.
37. Henry, C.S., S.J. Brooks, P. Duelli & J.B. Johnson, 1999. Revised concept of Chrysoperla mediterranea (Hölzel), a green lacewing associated with conifers: courtship songs across 2800 kilometers of Europe (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Syst. Entomol. 24: 335-350.
38. Henry, C.S., S.J. Brooks, D. Thierry, P. Duelli & J.B. Johnson, 2001. The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea s. lat.) and the sibling species problem, pp. 29-42 in Lacewings in the Crop Environment, edited by P.K. McEwen, T.R. New & A.E. Whittington. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Henry, C.S., S.J. Brooks, P. Duelli & J.B. Johnson, 2002. Discovering the true Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) using song analysis, morphology, and ecology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95: 172-191.
40. Higashi, M., G. Takimoto & N. Yamamura, 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402: 523-526.
41. Highton, R., 1995. Speciation in eastern North American salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 579-600.
42. Hillis, D.M., 1988. Systematics of the Rana pipiens complex: puzzle and paradigm. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 39-63.
43. Hoikkala, A., S. Paallysaho, J. Aspi & J. Lumme, 2000. Localization of genes affecting species differences in male courtship song between Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. Genet. Res. 75: 37-45.
44. Hostert, E.E., 1997. Reinforcement: a new perspective on an old controversy. Evolution 51: 697-702.
45. Johnson, N.K., 1963. Biosystematics of sibling species of flycatchers in the Empidonax hammondii-oberholserii-wrightii complex. Univ. Cal. Publ. Zool. 66: 79-238.
46. Jones, G., 1997. Acoustic signals and speciation: the roles of natural and sexual selection in the evolution of cryptic species. Adv. Stud. Behav. 26: 317-354.
47. Kingston, T., M.C. Lara, G. Jones, Z. Akbar, T.H. Kunz & C.J. Schneider, 2001. Acoustic divergence in two cryptic Hipposideros species: a role for social selection? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 1381-1386.
48. Kirkpatrick, M., 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1-12.
49. Knowlton, N., 1993. Sibling species in the sea. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 189-216.
50. Kondrashov, A.S. & F.A. Kondrashov, 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351-354.
51. Lambert, D.M., 1983. A population genetical study of the African mosquito Anopheles marshallii (Theobald). Evolution 37: 484-495.
52. Lande, R., 1981a. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics 99: 541-553.
53. Lande, R., 1981b. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
54. Lynch, M. & B. Walsh, 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
55. Marchetti, K., 1993. Dark habitats and bright birds illustrate the role of the environment in species divergence. Nature 362: 149-152.
56. Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Mousseau, T.A. & D.J. Howard, 1998. Genetic variation in cricket calling song across a hybrid zone between two sibling species. Evolution 52: 1104-1110.
58. Naisbit, R.E., C.D. Jiggins & J. Mallet, 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 1849-1854.
59. Nei, M., 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
60. Nice, C.C. & A.M. Shapiro, 2001. Population genetic evidence of restricted gene flow between host races in the butterfly genus Mitoura (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94: 257-267.
61. Noor, M.A.F. & C.F. Aquadro, 1998. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis: analysis of variation. Anim. Behav. 56: 115-125.
62. Panhuis, T.M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk & T. Tregenza, 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
63. Parker, G.A. & L. Partridge, 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353: 261-274.
64. Partridge, L. & G.A. Parker, 1999. Sexual conflict and speciation, pp. 130-159 in Evolution of Biological Diversity, edited by A.E. Magurran & R.M. May. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
65. Paterson, H.E.H., 1986. The recognition concept of species, pp. 21-29 in Species and Speciation (Transvaal Museum Monograph Number 4), edited by E.S. Vrba. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, South Africa.
66. Payne, R.J.H. & D.C. Krakauer, 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51: 1-9.
67. Podos, J., 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409: 185-188.
68. Pollack, G.S., 1979. Temporal patterns as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition. Science 204: 429-432.
69. Pomiankowski, A., 1988. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 5: 136-184.
70. Pomiankowski, A. & L. Sheridan, 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 242-244.
71. Price, T., 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353: 251-260.
72. Pugh, A.G. & M.G. Ritchie, 1996. Polygenic control of a mating signal in Drosophila. Heredity 77: 378-382.
73. Ritchie, M.G., 2000. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 267: 327-332.
74. Ritchie, M.G. & J.M. Gleason, 1995. Rapid evolution of courtship song pattern in Drosophila willistoni sibling species. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 463-479.
75. Ritchie, M.G. & S.D.F. Phillips, 1998. The genetics of sexual isolation, pp. 291-308 in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, edited by D.J. Howard & S.H. Berlocher. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
76. Scheffé, H., 1953. A method for judging all possible contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 40: 87-104.
77. Schliewen, U., K. Rassmann, M. Markmann, J. Markert, T. Kocher & D. Tautz, 2001. Genetic and ecological divergence of a monophyletic cichlid species pair under fully sympatric conditions in Lake Ejagham, Cameroon. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1471-1488.
78. Schluter, D., 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 372-380.
79. Schwartz, J.J., 1987. The importance of spectral and temporal properties in species and call recognition in a neotropical treefrog with a complex vocal repertoire. Anim. Behav. 35: 340-347.
80. Seehausen, O. & J.M. van Alphen, 1999. Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria? Ecol. Lett. 2: 262-271.
81. Shaw, K.L., 1996. Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 50: 256-266.
82. Smith, G., 2001. Spike2 for Windows Version 4.00, User's Manual. Cambridge Electronic Design Limited, Cambridge, UK.
83. Spiegelhalter, D.J., A. Thomas & N. Best, 1999. WinBUGS, Version 1.2. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.
84. StatSoft, 1999. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer Program Manual). StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK.
85. Takimoto, G., M. Higashi & N. Yamamura, 2000. A deterministic genetic model for sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 54: 1870-1881.
86. Ting, C.T., A. Takahashi & C.-I. Wu, 2001. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: concurrent evolution at multiple loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6709-6713.
87. Tomaru, M. & Y. Oguma, 1994. Genetic basis and evolution of species-specific courtship song in the Drosophila auraria complex. Genet. Res. 63:11-17
88. Tregenza, T. & R.K. Butlin, 1999. Speciation without isolation. Nature 400: 311-312.
89. Turelli, M., N.H. Barton & J.A. Coyne, 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330-343.
90. Turner, G.T., 1999. Explosive speciation of African cichlid fishes, pp. 113-129 in Evolution of Biological Diversity, edited by A.E. Magurran & R.M. May. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
91. Turner, G.E. & M.T. Burrows, 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 260: 287-292.
92. Turner, G.F., O. Seehausen, M.E. Knight, C.J. Allender & R.L. Robinson, 2001. How many species of cichlid fishes are there in African lakes? Mol. Ecol. 10: 793-806.
93. van Doorn, G.S., P.C. Luttikhuizen & F.J. Weissing, 2001. Sexual selection at the protein level drives the extraordinary divergence of sex-related genes during sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 2155-2161.
94. Vedenina, V.Y., 1990. Responses of sympatric acridid species to natural and artificial sound signals, pp. 366-370 in Sensory Systems and Communication in Arthropods, edited by K.W. Gribakin & A.V. Popov. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
95. Wells, M.M., 1993. Laboratory hybridization in green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla): evidence for genetic incompatibility. Can. J. Zool. 71: 233-237.
96. Wells, M.M., 1994. Small genetic distances among populations of green lacewings of the genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 737-744.
97. Wells, M.M. & C.S. Henry, 1992a. Behavioral responses of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to synthetic mating songs. Anim. Behav. 44: 641-652.
98. Wells, M.M. & C.S. Henry, 1992b. The role of courtship songs in reproductive isolation among populations of green lacewings of the genus Chrysoperla (Neuruptera: Chrysopidae). Evolution 46: 31-42.
99. Wells, M.M. & C.S. Henry, 1994. Behavioral responses of hybrid lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to courtship songs. J. Insect Behav. 7: 649-662.
100. West-Eberhard, M.J., 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-182.
101. Williams. M.A., A.G. Blouin & M.A.F. Noor, 2001. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences. Heredity 86: 68-77.
102. Wilson, A.B., K. Noack-Kunnmann & A. Meyer, 2000. Incipient speciation in sympatric Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fishes: sexual selection versus ecological diversification. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 267: 2133-2141.
103. Wright, S., 1968. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 1: Genetic and Biometric Foundations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, II.
104. Wu, C.-I., 1985. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39: 66-82.
105. Wu, C.-I., 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 851-865.
106. Zink, R.M., 1996. Species concepts, speciation, and sexual selection. J. Avian Biol. 27: 1-6