Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating

American Naturalist

Volumn 167, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 190-205

  Bürger, Reinhard ^a,b   Schneider, Kristan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Density dependent selection; Disruptive selection; Frequency dependent selection; Recombination; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC SELECTION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC SPECIATION; LINKAGE (GENETICS); MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 33144468774     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/499375     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barton, N. H., and P. Keightley. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:11-21.
2. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1987. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genetical Research 49:157-173.
3. Bodmer, W. F. 1965. Differential fertility in population genetic models. Genetics 51:411-424.
4. Bolnick, D. I. 2004a. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? an experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 58:608-613.
5. _. 2004b. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58:895-899.
6. Bolnick, D. I., and M. Doebeli. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433-2449.
7. Bulmer, M. G. 1974. Density-dependent selection and character displacement. American Naturalist 108:45-58
8. _. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon, Oxford.
9. Bürger, R. 2000. The mathematical theory of selection, recombination, and mutation. Wiley, Chichester.
10. _. 2002. On a genetic model of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection. American Naturalist 160:661-682.
11. _. 2005. A multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait. Journal of Mathematical Biology 50:355-396.
12. Bürger, R., and A. Gimelfarb. 2004. The effects of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic. Genetics 167: 1425-1443.
13. Bush, G. L. 1994. Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:285-288.
14. Christiansen, F. B., and V. Loeschcke. 1980. Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition. II. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects. Theoretical Population Biology 18:297-313.
15. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
16. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
17. Dieckmann, U., M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz. 2004. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9:893-909.
19. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interaction. American Naturalist 156(suppl.):S77-S101.
20. Drossel, B., and A. McKane. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetics models. Journal of Theoretical Biology 204:467-478.
21. Feldman, M. W. 1971. Equilibrium studies of two locus haploid populations with recombination. Theoretical Population Biology 2:299-318.
22. Gavrilets, S. 1998. One-locus two-allele models with maternal (paternal) selection. Genetics 149:1147-1152.
23. _. 2003. Models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197-2215.
24. _. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
25. Gavrilets, S., and C. R. B. Boake. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. American Naturalist 152:706-716.
26. Gavrilets, S., and D. Waxman. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:10533-10538.
27. Geritz, S. A. H., and E. Kisdi. 2000. Adapative dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:1671-1678.
28. Gourbiere, S. 2004. How do natural and sexual selection contribute to sympatric speciation? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:1297-1309.
29. Hadeler K. P., and U. Liberman 1975. Selection models with fertility differences. Journal of Mathematical Biology 2:19-32.
30. Higashi, M., G. Takimoto, and N. Yamamura. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402:523-526.
31. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 72:283-327.
32. Jones, A. G., G. I. Moore, C. Kvarnemo, D. Walker, and J. C. Avise. 2003. Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100:6598-6603.
33. Kawecki, T. 1997. Sympatric speciation by habitat specialization driven by deleterious mutations. Evolution 51:1751-1763.
34. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
35. Kirkpatrick, M., and S. L. Nuismer. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271:687-693.
36. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. American Naturalist 159(suppl.):S22-S35.
37. Kirzhner, V., and Y. Lyubich. 1997. Multilocus dynamics under haploid selection. Journal of Mathematical Biology 35:391-408.
38. Kondrashov, A. S., and F. A. Kondrashov. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351-354.
39. Loeschcke, V., and F. B. Christiansen. 1984. Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition. II. A two-locus model for additive gene effects. Theoretical Population Biology 26:228-264.
40. Mackay, T. F. C. 2001. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annual Review of Genetics 35:303-339.
41. Matessi, C., A. Gimelfarb, and S. Gavrilets. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2:41-64.
42. McKinnon, J. S., S. Mort, B. K. Blackman, L. David, D. M. Kingsley, L. Jamieson, J. Chou, and D. Schluter. 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429:294-298.
43. Parker, G. A., and L. Partridge. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 261-274.
44. Rutschman, D. H. 1994. Dynamics of the two-locus haploid model. Theoretical Population Biology 45:167-176.
45. Schliewen, U. K., D. Tautz, and S. Pääbo. 1994. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature 368:629-632.
46. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. _. 2003. Frequency dependent natural selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Evolution 57:1142-1150.
48. Schneider, K. A. 2005. Competitive divergence in non-random mating populations. Theoretical Population Biology 68:105-118.
49. Schneider, K. A., and R. Bürger. 2005. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, doi:10.1111/j1420-9101.2005.01001.x.
50. Slatkin, M. 1979. Frequency- and density-dependent selection on a quantitative character. Genetics 93:755-771.
51. Smith, T. B. 1990. Natural selection on bill characters in two bill morphs of the African finch Pyrenestes ostrinus. Evolution 44:832-842.
52. _. 1993. Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch Pyrenestes. Nature 363:618-620.
53. Swanson, B. O., A. C. Gibb, J. C. Marks, and D. A. Hendrickson. 2003. Trophic polymorphism and behavioral differences decrease intraspecific competition in a cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. Ecology 84:1441-1446.
54. Thieme, H. 2003. Mathematics in population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
55. Turelli, M., and N. H. Barton. 2004. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions. Genetics 166:1053-1079.
56. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:330-343.
57. Van Dooren, T. J. M. 1999. The evolutionary ecology of dominance-recessivity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 198:519-532.
58. van Doorn, G. S., A. J. Noest, and P. Hogeweg. 1998. Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:1915-1919.
59. Via, S. 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:381-390.