A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 778-789

  Hwang, Gwo Jen ^a   Shi, Yen Ru ^b   Chu, Hui Chun ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TAINAN   (Taiwan)

^c SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT MAPS; CONTEXT-AWARE; ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS; LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT; LEARNING APPROACH; LEARNING MOTIVATION; LEARNING PROCESS; LEARNING RESOURCE; LEARNING SCENARIOS; MINDTOOLS; MOBILE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION; SHARE KNOWLEDGE; UBIQUITOUS LEARNING;

MOBILE DEVICES; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 80051779154     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01102.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson-Inman, L., &, Ditson, L., (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: a tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26, 8, 6-13.
2. Bandura, A., (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
3. Bandura, A., (1996). Multifaced impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206-1222. (Pubitemid 126418150)
4. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., &, Pastorelli, C., (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206-1222. (Pubitemid 126418150)
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., &, Duguid, P., (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 1, 32-42.
6. Bruner, J., (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Burleson, W., (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 436-451. (Pubitemid 41261282)
8. Chen, C. H., Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Chen, S. H., &, Huang, S. Y., (2009). Analysis of a ubiquitous performance support system for teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 4, 1-13.
9. Chiou, C. C., (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 45, 4, 375-387.
10. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., &, Huang, Y. M., (2010). An enhanced learning diagnosis model based on concept effect relationships with multiple knowledge levels. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 1, 53-67.
11. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Huang, S. X., &, Wu, T. T., (2008). A knowledge engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The Electronic Library, 26, 3, 303-317.
12. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., &, Tsai, C. C., (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54, 1, 289-297.
13. Collins, A., (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 1, 28-36.
14. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C., &, Mandl, H., (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
15. Fox, N., Brennan, J., &, Chasen, S., (2008). Clinical estimation of fetal weight and the Hawthorne effect. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 141, 2, 111-114.
16. Ge, X., &, Land, S. M., (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes-using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52, 2, 5-22. (Pubitemid 39051404)
17. Herrington, J., &, Oliver, R., (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48, 3, 23-48. (Pubitemid 33238094)
18. Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., &, Hamelin, D., (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 95-111.
19. Horz, H., Winter, C., &, Fries, S., (2009). Differential benefits of situated instructional prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 4, 818-828.
20. Hwang, G. J., (2003). A concept map model for developing intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 40, 3, 217-235.
21. Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Yin, P. Y., &, Chuang, K. H., (2010). A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54, 404-415.
22. Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., &, Yang, S. J. H., (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 2, 81-91.
23. Hwang, G. J., Tseng, J. C. R., &, Hwang, G. H., (2008). Diagnosing student learning problems based on historical assessment records. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 1, 77-89.
24. Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Tsai, C. C., &, Yang, S. J. H., (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex experimental procedures. Computers & Education, 53, 2, 402-413.
25. Jonassen, D. H., (1999). Computers as Mindtools for schools, engaging critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., &, Yueh, H. P., (1998). Computers as Mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43, 2, 24-32.
27. Jonassen, D. H., &, Carr, C. S., (2000). Mindtools: affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In, S. P. Lajoie, (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools. No more walls (Vol. 2, pp. 165-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawlence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Jonassen, D. H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., &, Haag, B. B., (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9, 2, 7-25.
29. Kao, G. Y. M., Lin, S. S. J., &, Sun, C. T., (2008a). Beyond Sharing: engaging Students in Cooperative and Competitive Active Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 3, 82-96.
30. Kao, G. Y. M., Lin, S. S. J., &, Sun, C. T., (2008b). Breaking concept boundaries to enhance creative potential: using integrated concept maps for conceptual self-awareness. Computers & Education, 51, 1718-1728.
31. Kommers, P., Jonassen, D. H., &, Mayes, T., (Eds) (1992). Cognitive tools for learning. Heidelberg, FRG: Springer.
32. Lave, J., (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, &, S. D. Teasley, (Eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Leng, B. A. de, Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Jöbsis, R., Muijtjens, A. M. M., &, Vleuten, C. P. M. van der, (2009). Exploration of an e-learning model to foster critical thinking on basic science concepts during work placements. Computers & Education, 53, 1, 1-13.
34. Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., &, Chen, G. D., (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1906-1920.
35. Liu, C. C., Don, P. H., &, Tsai, C. M., (2005). Assessment based on linkage patterns in concept maps. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 21, 5, 873-890.
36. Minami, M., Morikawa, H., &, Aoyama, T., (2004). The design of naming-based service composition system for ubiquitous computing applications. Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Applications and the Internet-Workshops (SAINT 2004 Workshops) (pp. 304-312). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
37. Norman, D. A., (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
38. Novak, J. D., &, Cañas, A. J., (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Information Visualization, 5, 175-184. (Pubitemid 44359514)
39. Novak, J. D., &, Gowin, D. B., (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Novak, J. D., &, Musonda, D., (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Education Research Journal, 28, 117-153.
41. Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., &, Radovic, D., (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52, 1, 147-153.
42. Ogata, H., &, Yano, Y., (2004, March). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. Paper presented at the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, JhongLi, Taiwan.
43. Pajares, F., (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: a review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158.
44. Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., Triampo, W., &, Shih, B. Y., (2010). A multi-expert approach for developing testing and diagnostic systems based on the concept-effect model. Computers & Education, 55, 2, 527-540.
45. Pena-Shaffa, J. B., &, Nichollsb, C., (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42, 3, 243-265.
46. Peng, H. Y., Su, Y. J., Chou, C., &, Tsai, C. C., (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 2, 171-183.
47. Reader, W., &, Hammond, N., (1994). Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Computers & Education, 12, 99-106.
48. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., &, Shavelson, R. J., (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569-600. (Pubitemid 126420860)
49. Trent, S. C., Pernell, E., Jr, Mungai, A., &, Chimedza, R., (1998). Using concept maps to measure conceptual change in preservice teachers enrolled in a multicultural education/special education course. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 16-30.
50. Tsai, M. J., &, Tsai, C. C., (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 1, 43-50.
51. Valcke, M., Rots, I., Verbeke, M., &, Braak, J. V., (2007). ICT teacher training: evaluation of the curriculum and training approach in Flanders. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 6, 795-808.
52. Vrasidas, C., (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 4, 339-362.
53. Vygotsky, L., (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Wenger, E., (1997). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Â). Computers & Education, 52, 1, 210-219.
56. Yang, S. J. H., Okamoto, T., &, Tseng, S. S., (2008). A matter of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 2, 1-2.
57. Young, M. F., (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43, 1, 43-58.
58. Zimmerman, B. J., (1995). Attaining reciprocality between learning and development through self-regulation. Human Development, 38, 367-372. (Pubitemid 126003164)