Scaffolding project-based learning with the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK®)

Computers and Education

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 210-219

  Rooij, Shahron Williams van ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E learning; Instructional design; Postsecondary education; Project management; Project based learning; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; EDUCATION; FLOW INTERACTIONS; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; TURBULENT FLOW;

BODY OF KNOWLEDGES; COLLABORATIVE BEHAVIORS; CRITICAL FACTORS; FINAL PRODUCTS; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN; INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES; LEARNING GAINS; ONLINE PROJECTS; POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION; PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES; PROJECT EXPERIENCES; PROJECT LIFE CYCLES; PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES; PROJECT OUTCOMES; PROJECT PRODUCTS; PROJECT SURVEYS; PROJECT TEAMS; PROJECT-BASED LEARNING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES; STUDENT ASSESSMENTS; TEAM COMMUNICATIONS; TEAM INTERACTIONS; THREADED DISCUSSIONS; UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON; VIRTUAL TEAMS;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 56249143763     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bessner C., and Hobbs B. Project management practice, generic or contextual: A reality check. Project Management Journal 39 1 (2008) 16-33
2. Chiocchio F. Project team performance: A study of electronic task and coordination communication. Project Management Journal 38 1 (2007) 97-109
3. Conrad K., and TrainingLinks Check. Instructional design for web-based training (2000), HRD Press, Amherst
4. Crawford L., and Pollack J. How generic are project management knowledge and practice?. Project Management Journal 38 1 (2007) 87-96
5. Dick W., Carey L., and Carey J. The systematic design of instruction. 6th ed. (2005), Prentice-Hall, New York
6. Duarte D., and Tennant Snyder N. Mastering virtual teams. 2nd ed. (2001), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
7. Garson, G. (2008). Student's t-test of difference of means. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from North Carolina State University Web site: http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/ttest.htm.
8. Griffith T., Mannix E., and Neale M. Conflict and virtual teams. In: Gibson C., and Cohen S. (Eds). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (2003), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 335-352
9. Gunawardena C., Anderson T., and Lowe C. Interaction analysis of a global online debate and the development of a constructivist interaction analysis for computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 17 4 (1997) 397-431
10. Helle L., Tynjala P., and Olkinuora E. Project-based learning in post-secondary education - theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education 51 2 (2006) 287-314
11. Henderson L.S. The impact of project managers' communication competencies: Validation and extension of a research model for virtuality, satisfaction, and productivity in project teams. Project Management Journal 39 2 (2008) 48-59
12. Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye A. (Ed). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (1992), Springer-Verlag, New York
13. International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction (IBSTPI). (2000). Instructional design competencies. Retrieved January 5, 2007, from the IBSTPI Web site: http://www.ibstpi.org/competencies.htm.
14. Kao M.T., Lehman J.D., and Cennamo K.S. Scaffolding in hypermedia assisted instruction: An example of integration. National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1996) 803 (ERIC document reproduction service No. ED397)
15. Kioppenborg T.J., and Opfer W.A. The current state of project management research: Trends, interpretations and predictors. Project Management Journal 33 2 (2002) 5-18
16. Lave J., and Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (1991), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
17. Lee-Kelley L., and Sankey T. Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study. International Journal of Project Management 26 1 (2008) 51-62
18. Leybourne S.A. The changing bias of project management research: A consideration of the literatures and an application of extant theory. Project Management Journal 38 1 (2007) 61-73
19. Lipscomb, L., Swanson, J., West, A. (n.d.). Scaffolding. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, University of Georgia Web site: http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Scaffolding.
20. Majchraz A., Rice R., Malhotra A., King N., and Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly 24 4 (2000) 569-600
21. McLoughlin C., and Luca J. A learner-centred approach to developing team skills through web-based learning and assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology 33 5 (2002) 571-582
22. Montoya-Weiss M., Massey A., and Song M. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal 44 5 (2001) 1251-1262
23. National educational technology standards (NETS) for students. (2007). Retrieved April 15, 2008, from the International Society for Technology in Educations (ITSE) Web site: http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007.htm.
24. Palloff R., and Pratt K. Collaborating online: Learning together in community (2005), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
25. Powell A., Piccoli G., and Ives B. Virtual teams: A review of the current literature and future research directions. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 35 1 (2004) 6-36
26. Prince M., and Felder R. The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching 36 5 (2007) 14-20
27. Project Management Institute. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (Third ed.). Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
28. Qureshi S., Liu M., and Vogel D. The effects of electronic collaboration in distributed project management. Group Decision and Negotiation 15 1 (2006) 55-75
29. Schrire S. Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education 46 1 (2006) 49-70
30. Seymour, E. (1997). Student assessment of learning gains (SALG). Retrieved August 28, 2007, from the University of Wisconsin Web site: http://www.salgsite.org/.
31. Smith P., and Ragan T. Instructional design. 3rd Edition ed. (2005), John Wiley & Soncs, Inc, New York
32. Thomas, J. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.
33. Thomas W., and MacGregor S.K. Online project-based learning: How collaborative strategies and problem-solving processes impact performance. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 16 1 (2005) 83-107
34. Wilkinson D., and Birmingham P. Using research instruments: A guide for researchers (2003), Routledge, London
35. Williams van Rooij S. WebMail vs WebApp: Comparing problem-based learning methods in a business research course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 18 4 (2007) 555-569