Perceived job discrimination: Toward a model of applicant propensity to case initiation in selection

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 229-244

  Anderson, Neil ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051676885     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00551.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson, N. (2001). Towards a theory of socialization impact: Selection as pre-entry socialization. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 84-91.
2. Anderson, N. (2004). Editorial - The dark side of the moon: Applicant perspectives, negative psychological effects (NPEs), and candidate decision making in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 1-8.
3. Anderson, N., Born, M., & Cunningham-Snell, N. (2001). Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 200-218). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
4. Anderson, N., & Goltsi, V. (2006). Negative Psychological Effects (NPEs) of assessment centers: Construct formulation and an empirical investigation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 236-255.
5. Anderson, N., & Ostroff, C. (1997). Selection as socialization. In N. Anderson & P. Herriot (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 124-140). London: Wiley.
6. Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalizability versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291-304.
7. Anderson, N., & Schalk, R. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 634-647.
8. Anderson, N., & Witvliet, C. (2008). Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: An international comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 1-13.
9. Arthur, W. Jr, & Doverspike, D. (2004). Achieving diversity and reducing discrimination in the workplace through human resource management practices: Implications of research and theory for staffing, training, and rewarding performance. In R. Dipboye & A. Collela (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 305-328). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Arvey, R. D., & Renz, G. L. (1992). Fairness in the selection of employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 331-340.
11. Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrarra, P., & Compion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the Selection Procedural Justice Scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387-419.
12. Bell, B. S., Ryan, A. M., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). Justice expectations and applicant perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 24-38.
13. Bertolino, M., & Steiner, D. D. (2007). Fairness reactions to selection methods: An Italian study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 107-205.
14. Chan, D. (1997). Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 311-320.
15. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Video-based paper-and-pencil methods of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143-159.
16. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2004). An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9-23.
17. Chao, G. T., & Nguyen, H.-H. D. (2004). International employment discrimination: A review of legal issues, human impacts, and organizational implications. In R. Dipboye & A. Collela (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 379-408). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 287-302.
19. Cook, M. (2008). Personnel selection: Adding value through people (5th ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Deery, S. J., Iverson, R. D., & Walsh, J. T. (2006). Toward a better understanding of psychological contract breach: A study of customer service employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 166-175.
21. De Jong, A. V. D., & Visser, D. (1999). Black and white employees' fairness perceptions of personnel selection techniques. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Derous, E., Born, M. Ph., & De Witte, K. (2004). How applicants want and expect to be treated: Applicants' selection treatment beliefs and the development of the Social Process Questionnaire on Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 99-119.
23. Ford, D., Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Shifting the focus to the promotional context: A new path for applicant reactions research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 402-416.
24. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems - An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
25. Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
26. Gilliland, S. W. (1995). Fairness from the applicant's perspective: Reactions to employee selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 3, 11-19.
27. Gilliland, S. W., & Steiner, D. D. (2001). Causes and consequences of applicant perceptions of unfairness. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 175-195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
29. Harris, M. M., Lievens, F., & van Hoye, G. (2004). "I think they discriminated against me": Using prototype theory and organizational justice theory for understanding perceived discrimination in selection and promotion situations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 54-65.
30. Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639-683.
31. Herriot, P. (2004). Social identities and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 75-83.
32. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40-51.
33. Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence, and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
34. Hülsheger, U. R., & Anderson, N. (2009). Applicant perspectives in selection: Going beyond preference reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 335-345.
35. Imus, A. L., & Ryan, A. M. (2005). Relevance and rigor in research on the applicant's perspective: In pursuit of pragmatic science. In A. Evers, N. Anderson, & O. Voskuijl (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of selection (pp. 291-305). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
36. Kehoe, J. F., & Olson, A. (2005). Cut scores and employment discrimination. In F. J. Landy (Ed.). Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives (pp. 410-449). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37. Landy, F. J. (2005). Phases of employment litigation. In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives (pp. 3-19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. Macan, T. H., Avedon, M. J., Paese, M., & Smith, D. E. (1994). The effects applicants reactions to cognitive-ability tests and an assessment center. Personnel Psychology, 47, 715-738.
39. Marcus, B. (1999). Attitudes toward selection methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Unpublished manuscript.
40. Marcus, B. (2003). Attitudes towards personnel selection methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 515-532.
41. Montes, S. D., & Irving, P. G. (2008). Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: Relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1367-1381.
42. Montes, S. D. & Zweig, D. (in press) Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology.
43. Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226-256.
44. Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. E. (2004). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 187-196.
45. Myors, B., et al. (2008). International perspectives on the legal environment for selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 206-246.
46. Nikolaou, I., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Greece. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 206-219.
47. Outtz, J. L. (2005). Race discrimination cases: Common themes. In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives (pp. 201-228). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48. Outtz, J. L., & Landy, F. L. (2005). Concluding thoughts. In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives (pp. 575-590). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2002). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Singapore and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 1186-1205.
50. Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 308-335.
51. Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1998). 'Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3-16.
52. Robertson, I. T., Iles, P. A., Gratton, L., & Sharpley, D. (1991). The impact of personnel selection and assessment methods on candidates. Human Relations, 44, 963-982.
53. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
54. Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525-546.
55. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259.
56. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). 'New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389-400.
57. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511-541.
59. Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). 'Applicants' perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565-606.
60. Ryan, A. M., Sacco, J. M., McFarland, L. A., & Kriska, S. D. (2000). Applicant self-selection: Correlates of withdrawal from a multiple hurdle process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 163-179.
61. Rynes, S. L., & Connerly, M. L. (1993). Applicants' reactions to alternative selection procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261-272.
62. Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1992). Test-taking dispositions: A missing link? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 629-637.
63. Schuler, H. (1993). Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. In H. Schuler, J. L. Farr, & Smith (Eds.), Personnel selection and assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives (pp. 11-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Sharf, J. (2000). As if 'g-loaded' adverse impact isn't bad enough, Internet recruiters can expect to be accused of 'e-loaded' impact. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 38, 156.
65. Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49-76.
66. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 124-141.
67. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (2001). Procedural justice in personnel selection: International and cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 124-137.
68. Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., & Brancart, S. (1999). Les réactions des candidates envers les techniques de sélection du personnel: Une étude dans un contexte francophone (Reactions of job applicants to personnel selection techniques: An investigation in a French-speaking context). Le Travail Humain, 62, 347-361.
69. Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (1999). Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. Journal of Applied Pschology, 84, 322-339.
70. Truxillo, D. M., Bodner, T. E., Bertolino, M., Bauer, T. N., & Yonce, C. A. (2009). Effects of explanations on applicant reactions. A meta-analysis review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 346-361.
71. Truxillo, D. M., Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (2004). The importance of organizational justice in personnel selection: Defining when selection fairness really matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39-53.
72. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Importance of perceived personnel selection system fairness determinants: Relations with demographic, personality, and job characteristics. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 172-186.