Fairness reactions to selection methods: An Italian study

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 197-205

  Bertolino, Marilena ^a,b   Steiner, Dirk D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250208488     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00381.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965) Inequity in Social Exchange. In : Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York : Academic Press, pp. 267 299.
2. Ambrose, M.L. Cropanzano, R. (2003) A Longitudinal Analysis of Organizational Fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 266 275.
3. Anderson, N. (2001) Towards a Theory of Socialization Impact: Selection as pre-entry socialization. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 84 91.
4. Anderson, N. (2003) Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A critical review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 121 136.
5. Anderson, N. Ostroff, C. (1997) Selection as Socialization. In : Anderson, N. Herriot, P. (eds), International HandBook of Selection and Assessment. Chichester : Wiley, pp. 413 440.
6. Argentero, P. (1999). L'intervista di Selezione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
7. Arvey, R.D. Sackett, P.R. (1993) Fairness in Selection: Current developments and perspectives. In : Schmitt, N. Borman, W.C. (eds), Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, pp. 171 202.
8. Bauer, T.N., Maertz, C.P., Jr., Dolen, M.R. Campion, M.A. (1998) Longitudinal Assessment of Applicant Reactions to Employment Testing and Test Outcome Feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892 903.
9. Bruchon-Schweizer, M. Ferrieux, D. (1991) Une Enquête sur le Recrutement en France (A Survey of Selection in France). European Review of Applied Psychology, 41, 9 17.
10. Chan, D. Schmitt, N. (1997) Video-Based versus Paper-and-Pencil Method of Assessment in Situational Judgment Tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 143 159.
11. Clark, T. (1993) Selection Methods Used by Executive Search Consultancies in Four European Countries: A survey and critique. Selection Methods of Executive Search Consultancies, 1, 1, 41 49.
12. Cropanzano, R. (1994) The Justice Dilemma in Employee Selection: Some reflections on the trade-off between fairness and validity. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 31, 3, 90 93.
13. Gilliland, S.W. (1993) The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 694 734.
14. Gilliland, S.W. (1994) Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691 701.
15. Hausknecht, J.P., Day, D.V. Thomas, S.C. (2004) Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639 684.
16. Hofstede, G. (1980) Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American theories apply abroad. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 375 394.
17. Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. London, UK : McGraw-Hill.
18. Leventhal, G.S. (1976) Fairness in Social Relationships. In : Thibaut, J.W., Spence, J.T. Carson, R.C. (eds), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ : General Learning Press, pp. 211 240.
19. Macan, T.H., Avedon, M.J., Paese, M. Smith, D.E. (1994) The Effects of Applicants' Reactions to Cognitive Ability Tests and an Assessment Center. Personnel Psychology, 47, 715 738.
20. Marcus, B. (2003) Attitudes toward Personnel Selection Methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 515 532.
21. Moscoso, S. Salgado, J.F. (2004) Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 187 196.
22. Ployhart, R.E. Ryan, A.M. (1997) Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 308 335.
23. Ryan, A.M. McFarland, L. (1998) An International Survey of Selection Practices. Paper presented at the annual conference of society for industrial and organizational psychology, Dallas, April, TX.
24. Ryan, A.M., McFarland, L., Baron, H. Page, R. (1999) An International Look at Selection Practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359 391.
25. Schmidt, F.L. Hunter, J.E. (1998) The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262 274.
26. Schuler, H. (1993) Social Validity of Selection Situations: A concept and some empirical results. In : Schuler, H., Farr, J.L. Smith, M. (eds), Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp. 11 26.
27. Singer, M.S. (1992) Procedural Justice in Management Selection: Identification of fairness determinants and associations of fairness perceptions. Social Justice Research, 5, 49 70.
28. Singer, M.S. (1993) Fairness in Personnel Selection. Aldershot, UK : Avebury.
29. Smither, J.W., Millsap, R.E., Stoffey, R.W., Reilly, R.R. Pearlman, K. (1996) An Experimental Test of the Influence of Selection Procedures on Fairness Perceptions, Attitudes about the Organization, and Job Pursuit Intentions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 297 318.
30. Steiner, D.D. (2001) Cultural Influences on Perceptions of Distributive and Procedural Justice. In : Gilliland, S.W., Steiner, D.D. Skarlicki, D. (eds), Theoretical and Cultural Perspectives on Organizational Justice. Greenwich, CT : Information Age Publishing, pp. 111 137.
31. Steiner, D.D. Gilliland, S.W. (1996) Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134 141.
32. Steiner, D.D. Gilliland, S.W. (2001) Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 124 137.
33. Steiner, D.D., Amoroso, S. Hafner, V. (2004) Les Perceptions de la Justice Organisationnelle en Entretien de Recrutement: Deux expé rimentations par simulation (Perceptions of Organizational Justice in the Selection Interview: Two simulation experiments). Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10, 111 130.
34. Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C. Brancart, S. (1999) Les Réactions des Candidats Envers les Techniques de Sélection du Personnel: Une étude dans un contexte francophone (Reactions of Job Applicants to Personnel Selection Techniques: An investigation in a French-speaking context.). Le Travail Humain, 62, 347 361.
35. Thibaut, J. Walker, L. (1975) Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Triandis, H.C. (1990) Theoretical Concepts That are Applicable to the Analysis of Ethnocentrism. In : Brislin, R.W. (ed.), Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology. Newbury Park, CA : Sage, pp. 34 55.
37. Truxillo, D.M. Bauer, T.N. (1999) Applicant Reactions to Test Score Banding in Entry-Level and Promotional Contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 322 339.
38. Truxillo, D.M., Bauer, T.N. Sanchez, R.J. (2001) Multiple Dimensions of Procedural Justice: Longitudinal effects on selection system fairness and test-taking self-efficacy. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 336 349.
39. Truxillo, D.M., Steiner, D.D. Gilliland, S.W. (2004) The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining when selection fairness really matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39 53.