Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: An international comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-13

  Anderson, Neil ^a   Witvliet, Carlijn ^a  

^a University of Amsterdam Business School   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38549167356     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00404.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson, N. (2003) Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A critical review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 121 136.
2. Anderson, N. (2004) Editorial - The Dark Side of the Moon: Applicant perspectives, negative psychological effects (NPES), and candidate decision making in selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 1 8.
3. Anderson, N. (2005) Relationships Between Practice and Research in Personnel Selection: Does the left hand know what the right is doing? In : Evers, A., Anderson, N. Voskuijl, O. (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1 24.
4. Anderson, N., Born, M. Cunningham-Snell, N. (2001) Recruitment and Selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes. In : Anderson, N., Ones, D.S., Senangil, H.K. Viswesvaran, C. (eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1. London : Sage, pp. 200 218.
5. Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M, Sanchez, R.J., Craig, J.M., Ferrarra, P. Compion, M.A. (2001) Applicant Reactions to Selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387 419.
6. Bertolino, M. Steiner, D.D. (2007) Fairness Reactions to Selection Methods: An Italian study, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 197 205.
7. Bertua, C., Anderson, N. Salgado, J.F. (2005) The Predictive Validity of Cognitive Ability Tests: A U.K. meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 387 409.
8. Campbell, D.T. Fiske, D.W. (1959) Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81 105.
9. Chan, D. Schmitt, N. (2004) An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9 23.
10. Cohen, J. (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Rev. edn). New York : Academic Press.
11. De Jong, A. Visser, D. (1999). Black and White Employees' Fairness Perceptions of Personnel Selection Techniques. Unpublished manuscript.
12. De Wolff, C.J. Van Den Bosch, G. (1998) The Selection Process. In : Drenth, P.J.D., Thierry, H. de Wolff, C.J. (eds), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. Hove, East Sussex : Psychology Press, pp. 124 138.
13. Drenth, P.J.D. (1989) Psychological Testing and Discrimination. In : Herriot, P. (ed.), Assessment and Selection in Organizations. Chichester : Wiley, pp. 71 80.
14. Drenth, P.J.D., Thierry, H. de Wolff, C.J. (1998) Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. UK : Psychology Press.
15. Gilliland, S.W. (1993) The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems - An Organizational Justice Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694 734.
16. Gilliland, S.W. (1994) Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to a Selection System. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691 701.
17. Greenberg, J. (1990) Organizational Justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399 432.
18. Hausknecht, J.P., Day, D.V. Thomas, S.C. (2004) Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639 683.
19. Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture's Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
20. Hülsheger, U.R., Maier, G.W. Stumpp, T. (2007) Validity of General Mental Ability for the Prediction of Job Performance and Training Success in Germany: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 3 18.
21. Imus, A.L. Ryan, A.M. (2005) Relevance and Rigor in Research on the Applicant's Perspective: In pursuit of pragmatic science. In : Evers, A., Anderson, N. Voskuijl, O. (eds), Handbook of Selection. Oxford : Blackwell, pp. 291 305.
22. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2004) 12,(2/1), 1-205. Special Issue on Applicant Reactions and Decision Making in Selection.
23. Lévy-Leboyer, C. (1994) Selection and Assessment in Europe. In : Triandis, H.C., Dunnette, M.D. Hough, L.M. (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 4. Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 173 190.
24. Macan, T.H., Avedon, M.J., Paese, M. Smith, D.E. (1994) The Effects of Applicants Reactions to Cognitive-Ability Tests and an Assessment-Center. Personnel Psychology, 47, 715 738.
25. Marcus, B. (1999). Attitudes Toward Selection Methods: A partial replication and extension in a German sample. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Moscoso, S. Salgado, J.E. (2004) Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 187 196.
27. Newell, S. Tansley, C. (2001) International Uses of Selection Methods. In : Cooper, C.L. Robertson, I.T. (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 21. Chichester : Wiley, pp. 195 213.
28. Nikolaou, I. Judge, T.A. (2007) Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 206 219.
29. Phillips, J.M. Gully, S.M. (2002) Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Singapore and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 1186 1205.
30. Roe, R.A. Van den Berg, P.T. (2003) Selection in Europe: Context, developments and research agenda. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 257 287.
31. Ryan, A.M. (1999) Employee Attitude Surveys in a Multinational Organization: Considering language and culture in assessing measurement equivalence. Personnel Psychology, 52, 37 58.
32. Ryan, A.M., McFarland, L., Baron, H. Page, R. (1999) An International look at Selection Practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359 391.
33. Ryan, A.M. Ployhart, R.E. (2000) Applicants' Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565 606.
34. Rynes, S.L. Connerly, M.L. (1993) Applicants' Reactions to Alternative Selection Procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261 272.
35. Salgado, J.F. Anderson, N.R. (2002) Cognitive and GMA Testing in the European Community: Issues and evidence. Human Performance, 15, 75 96.
36. Salgado, J.F. Anderson, N. (2003) Validity Generalization of GMA Tests across Countries in the European Community. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 1 17.
37. Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C. De Fruyt, F. (2003a) International Validity Generalization of GMA & Cognitive Abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56, 573 605.
38. Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C. De Fruyt, F. (2003b) A Meta-Analytic Study of General Mental Ability Validity for Different Occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1068 1081.
39. Schmitt, N. Chan, D. (1998) Personnel Selection: A theoretical approach. Foundations of Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
40. Schmitt, N. Chan, D. (1999) The Status of Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Tests and its Implications for Managers. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 45 61.
41. Schmitt, N. Gilliland, S.W. (1992) Beyond Differential Prediction: Fairness in selection. In : Saunders, D.M. (ed.), New Approaches to Employee Management: Fairness in employee selection, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press, pp. 21 46.
42. Schuler, H. (1993) Social Validity of Selection Situations: A concept and some empirical results. In : Schuler, H., Farr, J.L. Smith, J.M. (eds), Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and organizational perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, pp. 11 26.
43. Shackleton, V. Newell, S. (1994) European Management Selection Methods: A comparison of five countries. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 91 102.
44. Shimmin, S. (1989) Selection in a European Context. In : Herriot, P. (ed.), Assessment and Selection in Organizations. Chichester : John Wiley & Sons, pp. 109 118.
45. Smither, J.W., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.E., Pearlman, K. Stoffey, R.W. (1993) Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49 76.
46. Steiner, D.D. Gilliland, S.W. (1996) Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 124 141.
47. Steiner, D.D. Gilliland, S.W. (2001) Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 124 137.
48. Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C. Brancart, S. (1999) Les réactions des candidates envers les techniques de sélection du personnel: Une étude dans un contexte francophone (Reactions of Job Applicants to Personnel Selection Techniques: An investigation in a french-speaking context). Le Travail Humain, 62, 347 361.