Patient-expert partnerships in research: How to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives

Health Expectations

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 225-239

  Elberse, Janneke E ^a   Caron Flinterman, J Francisca ^b   Broerse, Jacqueline E W ^a  

^a ATHENA INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Exclusion; Genuine dialogue; Health research agenda setting; Inclusion; Participation; Patient expert partnership

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECORDING; VIDEORECORDING;

COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; TAPE RECORDING; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 80051560596     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00647.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Epstein S. Impure Science; AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1996.
2. Loukanova S, Bridges J. Empowerment in medicine: an analysis of publication trends 1980-2005. Central European Journal of Medicine, 2008; 3: 105-110.
3. Williamson C. The patient movement as an emancipation movement. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 102-112.
4. Chopyak J, Levesque P. Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future. Technology in Society, 2002; 24: 155-166.
5. Irwin A. Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science, 2001; 10: 1-18.
6. Kerr A, Cunningham-Burley S, Tutton R. Shifting subject positions - experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science, 2007; 37: 385-411.
7. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 2001.
8. Chalmers I. What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient. British Medical Journal, 1995; 310: 1315-1318.
9. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. British Medical Journal, 1998; 316: 463-466.
10. Goodare H, Lockwood S. Involving patients in clinical research. Improves the quality of research. British Medical Journal, 1999; 319: 724-725.
11. Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 1996; 42: 759-768.
12. Needham C. Realising the potential of co-production: negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society, 2007; 7: 221-231.
13. Fiorino DJ. Citizen participation and environmental risk - a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 1990; 15: 226-243.
14. Goodare H, Smith R. The rights of patients in research. British Medical Journal, 1995; 310: 1277-1278.
15. Boon WPC. Demanding Dynamics, Demand Articulation of Intermediary Organisations in Emerging Pharmaceutical Innovations. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2008.
16. Chilvers J. Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2008; 33: 155-185.
17. Smits RE, Boon WP. The role of users in innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Discovery Today, 2008; 13: 353-359.
18. Tritter JQ. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 275-287.
19. Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The sneaks and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy, 2006; 76: 145-168.
20. Arnstein SR. Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969; 35: 216-224.
21. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research - changing the network. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2007; 32: 339-368.
22. Abma TA. Patient participation in health research: research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 2005; 15: 1310-1328.
23. Abma TA, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GA. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research, 2009; 19: 401-415.
24. Callon M, Rabeharisoa V. Research "in the wild" and the shaping of new social identities. Technology in Society, 2003; 25: 193-204.
25. Platner JH, Bennett LM, Millikan R, Barker MDG. The partnership between breast cancer advocates and scientists. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2002; 39: 102-107.
26. Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expectations, 2005; 8: 352-359.
27. Wallerstein N. Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. Social Science and Medicine, 1999; 49: 39-53.
28. Callaghan G, Wistow G. Governance and public involvement in the British National Health Service: understanding difficulties and developments. Social Science and Medicine, 2006; 63: 2289-2300.
29. Dewey JM. Knowledge legitimacy: how trans-patient behavior supports and challenges current medical knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 2008; 18: 1345-1355.
30. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 2002; 61: 213-236.
31. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Social Science and Medicine, 2005; 60: 2575-2584.
32. Shortall S. Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies, 2008; 24: 450-457.
33. Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J et al. Deliberations about deliberative methods; issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 2003; 57: 239-251.
34. Abma TA, Broerse JEW. Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 160-173.
35. Barnes M, Newman J, Knops A, Sullivan H. Constituting 'the public' in public participation. Public Administration, 2003; 81: 379-399.
36. Young IM. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
37. Greenbaum TL. Moderating Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Group Facilitation. Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage, 2000.
38. Dunkerley D, Glasner P. Empowering the public? Citizens' juries and the new genetic technologies. Critical Public Health, 1998; 8: 181-192.
39. Sunwolf, Leets L. Communication paralysis during peer-group exclusion - social dynamics that prevent children and adolescents from expressing disagreement. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2003; 22: 355-384.
40. Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR et al. Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expectations, 2009; 12: 209-220.
41. Rogerson-Revell P. Humour in business: a double-edged sword: a study of humour and style shifting in intercultural business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 2007; 39: 4-28.
42. Elberse JE, Caron-Flinterman F, de Cock-Buning T. Naar een gezamenlijke visie op onderzoek bij kinderen met een aangeboren hartafwijking.
43. Caron-Flinterman F, Broerse J, Teerling J et al. Stakeholder participation in health research agenda setting: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Science and Public Policy, 2006; 33: 291-304.
44. Broerse J, Zweekhorst M, van Rensen A, de Haan M. Involving burn survivors in agenda setting on burn research: an added value? Burns, 2010; 36: 217-231.
45. Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. Requirements for biotechnology development: the necessity of an interactive and participatory innovative development. International Journal of Biotechnology, 2000; 2: 275-296.
46. Roelofsen A, Broerse JEW, de Cock Buning TJ et al. Exploring the future of ecological genomics: integrating CTA with vision assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008; 75: 334-355.
47. Swaans K, Broerse J, Meincke M, Mudhara M, Bunders J. Promoting food security and well-being among poor and HIV/AIDS affected households: lessons from an interactive and integrated approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009; 32: 31-42.
48. Caron-Flinterman JF. A New Voice in Science: Patient Participation in Decision-Making on Bio-Medical Research. Zutphen, The Netherlands: Wohrmann Print Service, 2005, 19.
49. Elberse JE, de Wit M, Velthuis H et al. Netwerk Onderzoekspartners in de reumatologie. Getrainde patiëntvertegenwoordigers betrokken bij onderzoek. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Reumatologie, 2009; 4: 40-44.
50. Hoes A, Regeer B, Bunders J. TransFormers in knowledge production: building science-practice collaborations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2008; 5: 207-220.
51. Abma T, Broerse J. Zeggenschap in wetenschap. Den Haag, The Netherlands: LEMMA, 2007.
52. Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Care and Research, 2006; 55: 676-680.
53. Oliver S, Rees R, Clarke-Jones L et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 72-84.
54. El Ansari W. Collaborative research partnerships with disadvantaged communities: challenges and potential solutions. Public Health, 2005; 119: 758-770.
55. Bovaird T. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 2007; 67: 846-860.