Patient participation as dialogue: Setting research agendas

Health Expectations

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 160-173

  Abma, Tineke A ^a   Broerse, Jacqueline E W ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ATHENA INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Interactive approaches; Methodology; Participation; Research agenda setting; Responsive evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 77952215843     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Blume S, Catshoek G. Patiëntenperspectief in onderzoek [Patients' perspective in research].
2. Cayton H. Patients' views on the priorities of research into Alzheimer's disease. Patientview, Health and social campaigners' network international, 2005 : 24 26.
3. Chalmers I. Nutteloos bewijs [Useless evidence] NRC Handelsblad 2006. An interview by Wim Kohler, 28 October, 2006.
4. Ray L, Mayan M. Who decides what counts as evidence? Chapter 3. In : Morse JM, Swanson JM, Kuzel AJ (eds) The Nature of Evidence in Qualitative Research.
5. Stewart D. A patient talks about patient input into research. Patient view, Health and social campaigners' network international, 2005 : 21 22.
6. Wright D, Corner J, Hopkinson J, Foster C. Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expectations, 2006 9 : 3 12.
7. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research: changing the network. Science, Technology & Human Values, 2007 32 : 339 368.
8. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969 35 : 216 224.
9. Abma TA. Patient participation in health research. Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 2005 15 : 1 19.
10. Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement. Health Policy, 2006 76 : 156 168.
11. Broerse JEW. Towards a New Development Strategy: How to Include Small-Scale Farmers in the Technological Innovation Process.
12. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 1995 41 : 1667 1676.
13. Swaans K, Broerse J, Bunders J. Agriculture and HIV/AIDS: a challenge for integrated and interactive approaches. Journal for Agricultural Education and Extension, 2006 12 : 231 247.
14. Kasemir B, Jager J, Jaeger CC, Gardner MT. Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook.
15. Johnson MC, Poulin M, Graham M. Towards an integrated approach to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity: lessons learned from the Rideau River Biodiversity Project. Human Ecology Forum, 2003 10 : 40 55.
16. Driessen PPJ, Glasbergen P, Verdaas C. Interactive policy-making: a model of management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001 128 : 322 337.
17. Kickert WJM, Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM. Managing Complex Networks, Strategies for the Public Sector.
18. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation.
19. Greene JC, Abma TA Eds Responsive evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 2001 92 : 1 105.
20. Stake RE. Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation.
21. Abma TA, Widdershoven GAM. Sharing stories: narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 2005 28 : 90 109.
22. Abma TA, Nierse C, Adriaanse E, Widdershoven GAM. Onderzoekssturing door patiëntenverenigingen. Over de waarde van een stappenplan voor onderzoekssturing door cliëntenorganisaties. [Client organizations steering research. About the value of a methodology for research management by client organizations]. Medische Antropologie, 2006 18 : 213 232.
23. Nierse C, Abma TA, Horemans A, van Engelen B. Kwaliteit en gezondheid. Integrale agenda voor neuromusculair onderzoek [Quality and health. Integral agenda for neuromuscular research], Endreport, ZonMw/UM/VSN/ISNO,. 2007a.
24. Abma T, Nierse C, van de Griendt J, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E. Agenda voor sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar nierziekten vanuit patiëntenperspectief [Agenda for social scientific research on kidney disease from a patients' perspective], Endreport, Gezondheidsethiek en wijsbegeerte/UM, Nierpatiëntenvereniging, Nierstichting, 2006.
25. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Teerling J et al. Patient participation in health research agenda setting: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Science and Public Policy, 2006 33 : 291 304.
26. Broerse JEW, Zweekhorst MBM, Van Rensen A, De Haan M forthcoming) Involving burn survivors in agenda setting on health research: an added value? Burns.
27. Broerse JEW, Zweekhorst MBM, de Groot J, Oud SMM. Patië ntenraadpleging Diabetes Fonds. Eindrapportage [Patients'consultation Diabetes Fund. End report].
28. Nierse CJ, Abma TA, Broerse JEW et al. Partners in wetenschap. Mensen met een verstandelijke beperking doen mee in onderzoek. [Partners in research. People with intellectual disabilities are involved in research.]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Zorg aan Mensen met Verstandelijke Beperkingen, 2007 33 : 84 96.
29. Paterson M, Higgs J. Using hermeneutics as a qualitative research approach in professional practice. The Qualitative Report, 2005 10 : 339 357. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR310-332/paterson.pdf.
30. Abma TA, Broerse J. Zeggenschap in wetenschap. Patiëntenparticipatie in theorie en praktijk [Having 'a say' in science. Patient participation in theory and practice].
31. Abma TA, Nierse C, Widdershoven GAM. Patients as research partners in responsive research. Methodological notions for collaborations in research agenda setting. Qualitative Health Research, 2009 19 : 401 415.
32. Gadamer H-G. Wahrheit und Methode.
33. Greene JC. Participatory evaluation. In : Mabry L (eds) Evaluation and the Post-modern Dilemma. Advances in Program Evaluation.
34. de Wit M. "Bemoei je met je eigen zaken" Partnerschap in onderzoek: een positiebepaling binnen de reumatologie ["Mind your own business" Partnership in research: positioning oneself within rheumatology. Medische Antropologie [Medical Anthropology], 2004 16 : 21 34.
35. Widdershoven GAM. Dialogue in evaluation: a hermeneutic perspective. Evaluation, 2001 7 : 253 263.
36. Widdershoven GAM, Abma TA. Hermeneutic ethics between practice and theory. In : Ashcroft RE, Dawson A, Draper H, McMillan JR (eds) Principles of Health Care Ethics.
37. Ryan K, DeStefano L. Dialogue as democratic method. Evaluation, 2001 7.
38. Mertens D. The evaluator's role in the transformative context. In : Ryan KE, Schwandt TS (eds) Exploring Evaluator Role and Identity.
39. Abma TA. Storytelling as inquiry in a mental hospital. Qualitative Health Research, 1998 8 : 821 838.
40. Schwandt TA. A postscript of thinking about dialogue. Evaluation, 2001 7 : 264 276.
41. Abma TA. Stake RE. Stake's responsive evaluation. In : Greene J, Abma TA (eds) Responsive Evaluation.
42. Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, Calnan M. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome. Health Expectations, 2008 11 : 272 281.
43. Entwistle VA, Calnan M, Dieppe P. Consumer involvement in health services research agenda setting: the MRC Health Services Research Collaboration's contribution and persistent questions of value. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2008 11 (Suppl. 3 76 81.
44. Abma TA. The practice and politics of responsive evaluation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 2005 27 : 31 43.
45. Abma TA. Social relations of evaluation. In : Shaw IF, Greene JC, Mark MM (eds) Handbook of Evaluation: Programme, Policy and Practice.
46. Greene J. Dialogue in evaluation; a relational perspective. Evaluation, 2001 7 : 181 203.