Stakeholder participation in health research agenda setting: The case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 291-364

  Caron Flinterman, J Francisca ^a   Broerse, Jacqueline E W ^a   Teerling, Julia ^a   van Alst, Melissa L Y ^a   Klaasen, Simon ^a   Swart, L Edwin ^a   Bunders, Joske F G ^a  

^a ATHENA INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTHMA; MEDICINE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RESEARCH; RESPIRATORY DISEASE; STAKEHOLDER;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33745635341     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154306781778993     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abelson, J, P-G Forest, J Eyles, P Smith, E Martin and F-P Gauvin 2003. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 239-251.
2. Beierle, T C and D M Konisky 2000. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 587-602.
3. Bickerstaff, K and G Walker 2001. Participatory local governance and transport planning. Environment and Planning A, 33, 431-451.
4. Boote, J, R Telford and C Cooper 2002. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy, 61, 213-236.
5. Broerse, J E W and J F G Bunders 1999. Pitfalls in implementation of integral design approaches to innovation: the case of the Dutch Special Programme on Biotechnology. In integral Design: Innovation in Agriculture and Resource Management, ed. C Leeuwis, pp. 245-265. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Mansholt Institute/Backhuys.
6. Broerse, J E W and J F G Bunders 2000. Requirements for biotechnology development: the necessity of an interactive and participatory innovation process. International Journal of Biotechnology, 2, 275-296.
7. Buckland, S and S Gorin 2001. Involving consumers? An exploration of consumer involvement in NHS Research and Development managed by Department of Health Regional Offices. Winchester: Consumers in Research Support Unit.
8. Caron-Flinterman, J F, J E W Broerse and J F G Bunders 2005a. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research. Social Science and Medicine, 60(11), 2575-2584.
9. Caron-Flinterman, J F, J E W Broerse and J F G Bunders submitted. Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research: changing the network. Science, Technology, and Human Values.
10. Caron-Flinterman, J F, J E W Broerse, J Teerling and J F G Bunders 2005b. Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Health Expectations, 8, 253-263.
11. Crawford, M J, D Rutter, C Manley, T Weaver, K Bhui, N Fulop and P Tyrer 2002. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal, 325, 1263-1265.
12. De Cooker, D and M Koningstein 2003. De patiënt in biomedisch onderzoek: Patiëntenparticipatie in biomedisch astma- en COPDonderzoek. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
13. Driessen, P P J, P Glasbergen and C Verdaas 2001. Interactive policy-making - a model of management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 322-337.
14. Fiorino, D J 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 15, 226-243.
15. Flinterman, J F, R Teclemariam-Mesbah, J E W Broerse and J F G Bunders 2001. Transdisciplinarity: the new challenge for biomedical research. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 2, 253-266.
16. Guston, D H 1999. Evaluating the first US consensus conference: the impact of the citizens' panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 24, 451-482.
17. Halvorsen, K E 2003. Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review, 63, 535-543.
18. Ham, C and M Brommels 1994. Health care reform in The Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Health Affairs, 13, 106-119.
19. Hanley, B, J Bradburn, S Gorin, M Barnes, C Evans, H Goodare, M Kelson, A Kent, S Oliver and J Wallcraft 2000. Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS: briefing notes for researchers. Winchester: Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit.
20. Innes, L, L Bowen, N Bruce, L Scott and P Williams 2003. An evaluation of consumer participation in hospital breast services. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27, 72-79.
21. Irvin, R A and J Stansbury 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64, 55-65.
22. Irwin, A 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 1-18.
23. Jasanoff, S 2003. Breaking the waves in science studies: comment on H M Collins and Robert Evans, 'The Third Wave of Science Studies'. Social Studies of Science, 33, 389-400.
24. Jones, K, R Baggott and J Allsop 2004. Influencing the national policy process: the role of health consumer groups. Health Expectations, 7, 18-28.
25. Laird, F N 1993. Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18, 341-361.
26. Oliver, S R, L Clarke-Jones, R Rees, R Milne, P Buchanan, J Gabbay, G Gyte, A Oakley and K Stein 2004. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technology Assessment, 8, 1-148.
27. Renn, O, T Webler, H Rakel, P Dienel and B Johnson 1993. Public participation in decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sciences, 26, 189-214.
28. Rowe, G and L J Frewer 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25, 3-29.
29. Rowe, G and L J Frewer 2004. Evaluating public-participation exercises: a research agenda. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 29, 512-556.
30. Taylor-Powell, E and S Steele 1996. Collecting evaluation data: direct observation. University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit.
31. Teerling, J, J F Caron-Flinterman and J E W Broerse 2004. Programmering wetenschappelijk onderzoek astma en COPD 2005-2008: De maatschappelijke agenda. Leusden, the Netherlands: Nederlands Astma Fonds.
32. Telford, R, C A Beverley, C L Cooper and J D Boote 2002. Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction? British Journal of Clinical Governance, 7, 92-103.
33. Telford, R, J D Boote and C L Cooper 2004. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations, 7, 209-220.
34. Van Veldhuizen, L, A Waters-Bayer and H De Zeeuw 1997. Developing technology with farmers: a trainer's guide for participatory learning. London: Zed Books.
35. Van Wersch, A and M Eccles 2001. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality in Health Care, 10, 10-16.
36. Webler, T and O Renn 1995. A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice. In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, eds. O Renn, T Webler and P Wiedemann, pp. 17-33. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Webler, T and S Tuler 2000. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: theoretical reflections from a case study. Administration and Society, 32, 566-595.
38. Webler, T and S Tuler 2002. Unlocking the puzzle of public participation. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 22, 179-189.
39. Williamson, C 2001. What does involving consumers in research mean? QJM, 94, 661-664.