Hebrew plural inflection: Linear processing in a Semitic language

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 197-244

  Vaknin, Vered ^b,c   Shimron, Joseph ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b WESTERN GALILEE COLLEGE   (Israel)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051502717     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.6.2.01vak     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effect and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: Stems and inflections classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bat-El, O. (1989). Phonology and word structure in Modern Hebrew. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA
5. Bat-El, O. (2001). In search of the roots of the C-root: The essence of Semitic morphology. Workshop on root and template morphology. University of South California, Los Angeles.
6. Bat-El, O. (2003). Semitic verb structure within a universal perspective. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 29- 60). Amsterdam NL: John Benjamins.
7. Beck, M. L. (1997). Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: Tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences. Second Language Research, 13(2), 92-115.
8. Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to the repetition effect at long and short lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 693-711.
9. Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
10. Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J. (1999). Default nominal inflection in Hebrew: Evidence for mental variables. Cognition, 72, 1-44. (Pubitemid 29459115)
11. Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J. (2002). The nature of regularity and irregularity: Evidence from Hebrew nominal inflection. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 459-502. (Pubitemid 41462074)
12. Berent, I., Vaknin, V., & Marcus, G. F. (2007). Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representation: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognition, 104(2), 254-286. (Pubitemid 46802544)
13. Berman, R. A. (1978). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Project.
14. Berman, A. R. (1993). New root derivation in Hebrew. Tel Aviv University: Unpublished manuscript.
15. Bolozky, S., & Schwarzwald, O. R. (1992). On the derivation of Hebrew forms with the -ut suffix. Hebrew Studies, 33, 51-69.
16. Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representation in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 3-19.
17. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20(1&2), 207-260. (Pubitemid 40326165)
18. Burani, C., & Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 361-376). Oxford, UK: North-Holland.
19. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Clahsen, H. (2006). Dual-mechanism morphology. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 4. (pp. 1-5). Oxford: Elsevier.
21. Davis, M. H., & Quinlan, P. (Eds.) (2003). Connectionist modelling of lexical segmentation and vocabulary acquisition. Connectionist models of development: Developmental processes in real and artificial neural networks Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
22. Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I. (1998). Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24(5), 1238-1255. (Pubitemid 128548273)
23. Ephratt, M. (1985). Tavlat shoresh mishkal (Root pattern array). Doctoral dissertation. Jerusalem, Hebrew University. (Hebrew).
24. Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 3-38). London: Taylor Francis, Psychology Press.
25. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71-99. (Pubitemid 128770176)
26. Frost, R. (2003). The robustness of phonological effects in fast priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked Priming the State of the Art. The Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science, Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
27. Frost, R. (2010). Reading in Hebrew versus reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCradle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235-254). London: Taylor Francis Psychology Press.
28. Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2000). Decomposing complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 751-765.
29. Frost, R., Deutsch, A, Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2000). Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277-1288. (Pubitemid 32156346)
30. Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23(4), 829-856. (Pubitemid 127543617)
31. Gafos, A. I. (2003). Greenberg's asymmetry in Arabic: A consequence of stems in paradigms. Language, 79(2), 317-355. (Pubitemid 41411513)
32. Glinert, L. (1989). The grammar of modern Hebrew. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Gollan, T., & Frost, R. (2001). Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(6), 627-651. (Pubitemid 33750809)
34. Gordon, P., & Alegre, M. (1999). Is there a dual system for regular inflection? Brain & Language, 68, 212-217. (Pubitemid 29370227)
35. Heath, J. (2003). Arabic derivational ablaut, processing strategies, and consonantal rots. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 115-130). Amsterdam NL: John Benjamins.
36. Hoberman, R. D., & Aronoff, M. (2003). The verbal morphology of Maltese. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 61- 78). Amsterdam NL: John Benjamins.
37. Laudanna A., De Martino, M., & Shimron, J. (2004). La lettura ad alta voce di nomi italiani con desinenza canonica e non canonica. Paper presented at the AIP, Congresso Nazionale della Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Sciacca.
38. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 189-205. (Pubitemid 33379930)
39. Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741-769.
40. McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 373-418.
41. McCarthy, J., J. (1989). Linear order in phonological representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 71-99.
42. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
43. Munt, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241-253. (Pubitemid 29029968)
44. Ornan, U. (2003). Ha-mila ha-axrona [The final word: Mechanism for Hebrew word generation]. Haifa, Israel: University of Haifa Press (Hebrew).
45. Penke, M., & Krause, M. (2002). German noun plurals: A challenge to the dual-mechanism model. Brain & Language, 81(1-3), 303-311. (Pubitemid 34763830)
46. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.
47. Pinker, S. (1997). Words and rules in the human brain. Nature, 387, 547-548. (Pubitemid 27248740)
48. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
49. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of parallel distributed processing models of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193.
50. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
51. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 1-56.
52. Prasada, S., Pinker, S., & Snyder, W. (1990). Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-generated. Paper presented at the Thirty-first Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. New Orleans, November 16-18.
53. Prunet, J-F. (2006). External evidence and the Semitic root. Morphology, 16, 41-67. (Pubitemid 44526923)
54. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23(7 & 8), 942-971.
55. Ratcliffe, R. R. (1997). Prosodic templates in a word-base morphological analysis of Arabic. In M. Eid & R. R. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics. X. (pp. 147-171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Ravid, D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Ravid, D. (2006). Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals. Morphology, 16, 127-148.
58. Ravid, D., & Schlesinger, Y. (2001). Vowel reduction in Modern Hebrew: Traces of the past and current variation. Folia Linguistica, 35(3-4), 371-397.
59. Rose, S. (2003). The formation of Ethiopian Semitic internal duplication. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 79- 98). Amsterdam NL: John Benjamins.
60. Rueckl, J. G. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology, 14(1-2), 5-19. (Pubitemid 36630410)
61. Rueckl, J. G., & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain & Language, 68, 110-117. (Pubitemid 29370213)
62. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
63. Say, T., & Clahsen, H. (2001). Words, rules, and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty (pp. 75-108). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
64. Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2005). Morphological inflections and verbal skills in novice Hebrew readers. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading conference, Toronto, Canada, 24-26 June.
65. Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), O. (1991). Grammatical vs. lexical plural formation in Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 25 (3-4), 577-608.
66. Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), O. (2000). Shoresh ha-po'al ve-zikat ha-shem la-po'al. [The verb's root and the relation of the noun to the verb]. In O. Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), S. Blum-Kulka, & E. Olshtein (Eds.), Sefer Refa'el Nir (pp. 426-438). Jerusalem: Carmel (Hebrew).
67. Schwarzwald, O. R. (2001). Modern Hebrew. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
68. Schwarzwald, O. R. (2002). Ha-morfologiya ha-'ivrit (Hebrew) morphology). Units 4-6, 11-12. Tel Aviv: The Open University (Hebrew).
69. Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 52-67.
70. Shimron, J. (Ed.) (2003). Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
71. Shimron, J. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203-236. (Pubitemid 29462582)
73. Stemberger, J. (1995). Phonological and lexical constraints on morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 247-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition, 14(1), 17-26.
75. Ullman, M. (1999). Acceptability ratings for regular and irregular past tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighborhood effects. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 47-67.
76. Ussishkin, A. (2005). A fixed prosodic theory of non concatenative templatic morphology. Natural language & Linguistic theory, 23, 169-218.