Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from hebrew

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 627-651

  Gollan, Tamar H ^a,c   Frost, Ram ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agreement; Grammatical gender; Hebrew; Regularity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 0035524075     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1014235223566     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57, 193-216.
2. Balota, D. (1992). Visual word recognition: The journey from feature to meaning. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303-357). New York: Academic Press.
3. Barkali, S. (1969). Luax Hashemot. Rubin Mass, Jerusalem.
4. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 992-1004.
5. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D'Amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 847-862.
6. Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation, Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.
7. Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguislics (pp. 945-984). New York: Academic Press.
8. Butterworth, B. (1989). Eexical access in speech production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk. New York: Academic Press.
9. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
10. Cutler, A. (1987). Speaking for listening. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.), Language perception and production: Relationships between listening, speaking, reading, and writing. London: Academic Press,
11. de Groot, A. M. B., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1982). Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime. Memory & Cognition, 10, 358-370.
12. LaHeij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Pyschological Research, 61, 209-219.
13. Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41-104.
14. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Lexical access in speech production [Special issue]. Cognition, 42, 1-3.
16. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
17. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The retrieval of lexical-syntactic features in tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1-14.