Biodiversity studies in Phaseolus species by DNA barcoding

Genome

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 529-545

  Nicolè, Silvia ^a   Erickson, David L ^b   Ambrosi, Daria ^a   Bellucci, Elisa ^c   Lucchin, Margherita ^a   Papa, Roberto ^c,d   Kress, W John ^b   Barcaccia, Gianni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^d ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

DNA barcoding; internal transcribed spacers; Phaseolus spp.; plastid DNA; single nucleotide polymorphisms; varietal groups

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; DNA BARCODING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; PHASEOLUS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT SEED; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

BIODIVERSITY; CELL NUCLEUS; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; PHASEOLUS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEEDS;

PHASEOLUS COCCINEUS; PHASEOLUS LUNATUS; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; VIGNA UNGUICULATA;

EID: 79961152073     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/g11-018     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Álvarez I. Wendel J.F. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29 (3): 417-434. 10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2 14615184 (Pubitemid 37491888)
2. Angioi S.A. Desiderio F. Rau D. Bitocchi E. Attene G. Papa R. 2009. Development and use of chloroplast microsatellites in Phaseolus spp., and other legumes. Plant Biol. 11 (4): 598-612. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00143.x 19538398
3. Angioi S.A. Rau D. Attene G. Nanni L. Bellucci E. Logozzo G. et al. 2010. Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121 (5): 829-843. 10.1007/s00122-010-1353-2 20490446
4. Barcaccia G. Lucchin M. Parrini P. 2003. Characterization of a flint maize (Zea mays var. indurata) Italian landrace. II. Genetic diversity and relatedness assessed by SSR and Inter-SSR molecular markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 50 (3): 253-271. 10.1023/A:1023539901316 (Pubitemid 36614894)
5. Barrett R.D.H. Hebert P.D.N. 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can. J. Zool. 83 (3): 481-491. 10.1139/z05-024 (Pubitemid 41026503)
6. Brower A.V.Z. 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for speciesdelimitation: 'ten species' of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera:Hesperiidae). Syst. Biodivers. 4 (02): 127-132. 10.1017/S147720000500191X (Pubitemid 43825010)
7. Burle M.L. Fonseca J.R. Kami J.A. Gepts P. 2010. Microsatellite diversity and genetic structure among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in Brazil, a secondary center of diversity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121 (5): 801-813. 10.1007/s00122-010-1350-5 20502861
8. CBOL Plant Working Group. 2009. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (31): 12 794-12 797. 10.1073/pnas.0905845106 19666622
9. Chacón M.I. Pickersgill B. Debouck D.G. 2005. Domestication patterns in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and the origin of the Mesoamerican and Andean cultivated races. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110 (3): 432-444. 10.1007/s00122-004-1842-2 15655667 (Pubitemid 40564255)
10. Cowan R.S. Chase M.W. Kress W.J. Savolainen V. 2006. 300 000 species to identify: problems, progress and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon, 55 (3): 611-616. 10.2307/25065638 (Pubitemid 44534837)
11. Cronn R.C. Small R.L. Haselkorn T. Wendel J.F. 2002. Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. Am. J. Bot. 89 (4): 707-725. 10.3732/ajb.89.4.707 (Pubitemid 34439728)
12. DeSalle R. Egan M.G. Siddall M. 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (1462): 1905-1916. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1722 (Pubitemid 44365051)
13. Debouck D.G. Toro O. Paredes O.M. Johnson W.C. Gepts P. 1993. Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northwestern South America. Econ. Bot. 47 (4): 408-423. 10.1007/BF02907356 (Pubitemid 2040902)
14. Delgado-Salinas A. Turley T. Richman A. Lavin M. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and wild species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot. 24 (3): 438-460. 10.2307/2419699 (Pubitemid 29530833)
15. Evanno G. Regnaut S. Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14 (8): 2611-2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x 15969739 (Pubitemid 40886055)
16. Falush D. Stephens M. Pritchard J.K. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164 (4): 1567-1587. 12930761 (Pubitemid 37102217)
17. Fazekas A.J. Burgess K.S. Kesanakurti P.R. Graham S.W. Newmaster S.G. Husband B.C. et al. 2008. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS ONE, 3 (7): e2802. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002802 18665273
18. Gepts P. Beavis W.D. Brummer E.C. Shoemaker R.C. Stalker H.T. Weeden N.F. Young N.D. 2005. Legumes as a model plant family. Genomics for food and feed report of the cross-legume advances through genomics conference. Plant Physiol. 137 (4): 1228-1235. 10.1104/pp.105.060871 15824285 (Pubitemid 43119324)
19. Hajibabaei M. Singer G.A.C. Hickey D.A. 2006. Benchmarking DNA barcodes: an assessment using available primate sequences. Genome, 49 (7): 851-854. 10.1139/G06-025 16936793 (Pubitemid 44727343)
20. Hebert P.D.N. Cywinska A. Ball S.L. deWaard J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270 (1512): 313-321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 12614582 (Pubitemid 36228536)
21. Hebert P.D.N. Stoeckle M.Y. Zemlak T.S. Francis C.M. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol. 2 (10): e312. 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0020312 15455034 (Pubitemid 39532927)
22. Hickerson M.J. Meyer C.P. Moritz C. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Syst. Biol. 55 (5): 729-739. 10.1080/10635150600969898 17060195
23. Kami J. Velàsquez V.B. Debouck D.G. Gepts P. 1995. Identification of presumed ancestral DNA sequences of phaseolin in Phaseolus vulgaris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (4): 1101-1104. 10.1073/pnas.92.4.1101 7862642
24. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16 (2): 111-120. 10.1007/BF01731581 7463489 (Pubitemid 11166431)
25. Kress W.J. Erickson D.L. 2007. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE, 2 (6): e508. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000508 17551588
26. Kwak M. Gepts P. 2009. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 118 (5): 979-992. 10.1007/s00122-008-0955-4 19130029
27. Lledó M.D. Crespo M.B. Cameron K.M. Fay M.F. Chase M.W. 1998. Systematics of Plumbaginaceae based upon cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23 (1): 21-29. (Pubitemid 28222759)
28. Logozzo G. Donnoli R. Macaluso L. Papa R. Knupffer H. Zeuli P.S. 2007. Analysis of the contribution of Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools to European common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm and strategies to establish a core collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54 (8): 1763-1779. 10.1007/s10722-006- 9185-2 (Pubitemid 350172203)
29. Mason-Gamer R.J. Kellogg E.A. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45 (4): 524-545. 10.1093/sysbio/45.4.524
30. Meier R. Shiyang K. Vaidya G. Ng P.K.L. 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 55 (5): 715-728. 10.1080/10635150600969864 17060194
31. Meyer C.P. Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3 (12): e422. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 16336051 (Pubitemid 41796331)
32. Mohler, V., and Schwarz, G. 2008. Genotyping tools in plant breeding: from restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single nucleotide polymorphisms. In Molecular marker systems in plant breeding and crop improvement. Vol.55. Edited by H. Lorz and G. Wenzel. Springer, Berlin. pp.23-38.
33. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
34. Newmaster S.G. Fazekas A.J. Ragupathy S. 2006. DNA barcoding in land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Can. J. Bot. 84 (3): 335-341. 10.1139/B06-047 (Pubitemid 44426667)
35. Pallottini L. Garcia E. Kami J. Barcaccia G. Gepts P. 2004. The genetic anatomy of a patented yellow bean. Crop Sci. 44 (3): 968-977. 10.2135/cropsci2004.0968 (Pubitemid 38611142)
36. Papa, R., Nanni, L., Sicard, D., Rau, D., and Attene, G. 2006. The evolution of genetic diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris L. In Darwin's Harvest: new approaches to the origins, evolution and conservation of crops. Edited by T.J. Motley, N. Zerega, and H. Cross. Columbia University Press, New York.
37. Pritchard J.K. Stephens P. Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155 (2): 945-959. 10835412 (Pubitemid 30397141)
38. Rach J. DeSalle R. Sarkar I.N. Schierwater B. Hadrys H. 2008. Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275 (1632): 237-247. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1290 17999953 (Pubitemid 350295712)
39. Rossi M. Bitocchi E. Bellucci E. Nanni L. Rau D. Attene G. Papa R. 2009. Linkage disequilibrium and population structure in wild and domesticated populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Evol Appl. 2 (4): 504-522. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00082.x
40. Rozas J. Sánchez-DelBarrio J.C. Messeguer X. Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 19 (18): 2496-2497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359 14668244 (Pubitemid 38016658)
41. Sang T. Crawford D.J. Stuessy T.F. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84 (8): 1120-1136. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01137.x (Pubitemid 28106981)
42. Shaw J. Small R.L. 2005. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny and phylogeography of the North American plums (Prunus subgenus Prunus section Prunocerasus, Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 92 (12): 2011-2030. 10.3732/ajb.92.12.2011 (Pubitemid 43194529)
43. Sicard D. Nanni L. Porfiri O. Bulfon D. Papa R. 2005. Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L., and P. coccineus L. landraces in central Italy. Plant Breed. 124 (5): 464-472. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01137.x (Pubitemid 41463371)
44. Taberlet P. Gielly L. Pautou G. Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17 (5): 1105-1109. 10.1007/BF00037152
45. Tamura K. Dudley J. Nei M. Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092 17488738 (Pubitemid 47236692)
46. Tate J.A. Simpson B.B. 2003. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploidy species. Syst. Bot. 28 (4): 723-737. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1 (Pubitemid 36072679)
47. Tautz D. Arctander P. Minelli A. Thomas R.H. Vogler A.P. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 (2): 70-74. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1 (Pubitemid 36072679)
48. Tingshuang Y. Miller A.J. Wen J. 2004. Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversification of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) in the Northern Hemisphere. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33 (3): 861-879. 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.07.006 15522809 (Pubitemid 39444520)
49. Tsai L.-C. Wang J.-C. Hsieh H.-M. Liu K.-L. Linacre A. Lee J.C. 2008. Bidens identification using the noncoding regions of chloroplast genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2 (1): 35-40. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.07.005 19083787 (Pubitemid 350107736)
50. Velzen R. Bakker F.T. Loon J.J.A. 2007. DNA barcoding reveals hidden species diversity in Cymothoe (Nymphalidae). Proc. Neth. Entomol. Soc. Meet. 18: 95-103.
51. Vences M. Thomas M. Bonett R.M. Vieites D.R. 2005. Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (1462): 1859-1868. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1717 16221604 (Pubitemid 44365046)
52. Vollmer S.V. Palumbi S.R. 2004. Testing the utility of internally transcribed spacer sequences in coral phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. 13 (9): 2763-2772. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02265.x 15315687 (Pubitemid 39151632)
53. Ward R.D. Zemlak T.S. Innes B.H. Last P.R. Hebert P.D.N. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360 (1462): 1847-1857. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716 16214743 (Pubitemid 44365045)
54. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J.W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Edited by M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, and T.J. White. Academic Press, Inc., New York. pp. 315-322.
55. Whitlock B.A. Hale A.M. Groff P.A. 2010. Intraspecific inversions pose a challenge for the trnH-psbA plant DNA barcode. PLos ONE, 5 (7): e11533. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011533
56. Wiemers M. Fiedler K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycanidae). Front. Zool. 4: 8. 10.1186/1742-9994-4-8 17343734 (Pubitemid 46512172)
57. Will K.W. Rubinoff D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics, 20 (1): 47-55. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.00008.x (Pubitemid 38370666)
58. Will K.W. Mishler B.D. Wheeler Q.D. 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54 (5): 844-851. 10.1080/10635150500354878 16243769 (Pubitemid 43148768)
59. Wojciechowski M.F. Lavin M. Sanderson M.J. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am. J. Bot. 91 (11): 1846-1862. 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846 (Pubitemid 43186482)
60. Wong E.H. Hanner R.H. 2008. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res. Int. 41 (8): 828-837. 10.1016/j.foodres.2008. 07.005