Ripe nectarines segregated through sensory quality evaluation and electronic nose assessment

Fruits

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 109-119

  Infante, Rodrigo ^a   Rubio, Pía ^a   Meneses, C ^a   Contador, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS PERSICA; PRUNUS PERSICA NUCIPERSICA;

EID: 79961092511     PISSN: 02481294     EISSN: 1625967X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/fruits/2011020     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Shewfelt R.L., What is quality? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15 (1999) 197-200.
2. Infante R., Meneses P., Predieri S., Sensory quality performance of two nectarine flesh typologies exposed to distant market conditions, J. Food Qual. 31 (2008) 526-535.
3. Predieri S., Missere D., Gatti E., Buona come una pera - Analisi sensoriale per scoprire vizi e virt - di un frutto, in: Ravaioli A., Mazzotti V. (Eds.), Pere dell'Emilia-Romagna IGP, Qualit.. tipica vera e protetta, 2001, pp. 114-117.
4. Di Natale C., Macagnano A., Martinelli E., Proietti E., Paolesse R., Castellari L., D'amico A., Electronic nose based investigation of the sensorial properties of peaches and nectarines, Sens. Actuators B 77 (2001) 561-566.
5. Sohn J.H., Smith R., Yoong E., Leis J, Galvin G., Quantification of odours from piggery effluent ponds using an electronic nose and a artificial neural network, Biosyst. Eng. 86 (2003) 399-410.
6. Ayala-Zavala J.F., Wang S.Y., Wang C.Y, Gonzlez-Aguilar G.A., Effect of storage temperaturas on antioxidant capacity and aroma compounds in strawberry fruits, Lebensm.-Wiss.Technol. 37 (2004) 687-695.
7. Bonghi C., Ramina A., Ruperti B., Vidrih R., Tonutti P., Peach fruit ripening and quality in relation to picking time, and hipoxic and high CO2 short-term postharvest treatments, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 16 (1999) 213-222.
8. Sinesio F., Di Natale C., Quaglia G., Bucarelli F., Moneta E., Macagnano A., Paolesse R., D'amico A., Use of electronic nose and trained sensory panel in the evaluation of tomato quality, J. Sci. Food Agric. 80 (2000) 63-71.
9. Hernndez Gmez A., Hu G., Wang J., Garca Pereira A., Evaluation of tomato maturity by electronic nose, Comput. Electron. Agric. 56 (2006) 44-52.
10. Infante R., Farcuh M., Meneses C., Monitoring the sensorial quality and aroma through an electronic nose in peaches during cold storage, J. Sci. Food Agric. (2008) 2073-2078.
11. Zhang H., Chang M., Wang J., Ye S., Evaluation of peach quality indices using an electronic nose by MLR, QPST and BP network, Sens. Actuators B 134 (2008) 332-338.
12. Zhang H., Wang J., Ye S., Prediction of acidity, soluble solids content and firmness of pear using electronic nose technique, J. Food Eng. 86 (2008) 370-378.
13. McGuire R., Reporting for objective color measurements, HortScience 27 (1992) 1254-1255.
14. Esposto S., Montedoro G., Selvaggini R., Ricc I., Taticchi A., Urbani S., Servili M., Monitoring of virgin olive oil volatile compounds evolution during olive malaxation by an array of metal oxide sensors, Food Chem. 113 (2009) 345-350.
15. Di Rienzo J.A., Casanoves F., Balzarini M.G., Gonzlez L., Tablada M., Robledo C.W., InfoStat versin 2008, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Univ. Nac. Crdoba, Argentina, 2008.
16. Balzarini M.G., Gonzlez L., Tablada M., Casanoves F., Di Rienzo J.A, Robledo C.W., Manual del usuario, Editor. Brujas, Argentina, 2008, pp. 182-188.
17. Pardo A., Ruiz M.A., SPSS11: Gua para el anlisis de datos, Mc Graw Hill., Madrid, Spain, 2002, pp. 363-379.
18. Crisosto C., How do we increase peach consumption? Acta Hortic. 592 (2002) 601-605.
19. Crisosto C., Crisosto G., Bowerman E., Understanding consumer acceptance of peach, nectarine, and plum cultivars, Acta Hortic. 604 (2003) 115-119.
20. Crisosto C., Crisosto G., Echeverra G., Puy J., Segregation of peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 39 (2006) 10-18.
21. Moriguchi T., Ishizawa Y., Sanada T., Differences in sugar composition in Prunus persica fruit and the classification by the principal component analysis, J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 59 (1990) 307-312.
22. Robertson J.A., Horvat R.J., Lyon B.G., Meredith F.I., Senter S.D., Okie W.R., Comparison of quality characteristics of selected yellow- and white-fleshed peach cultivars, J. Food Sci. 55 (1990) 1308-1311.
23. Fillon L., Kilcast D., Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables, Food Qual. Pref. 13 (2002) 23-29.
24. Neri F., Pratella G.C., Brigati S., Gli indici di maturazione per ottimizzare la qualit... organolettica della fruta, Frutticoltura 5 (2003) 20-29.
25. Testoni A., Grassi B., Grassi M., Lovati F., Evoluzione della maturazione in pesche e nettarine in funzione della durata e del metodo di conservazione, Atti III Giornate SOI, 10-14 March 1996, Erice, Italy, 1996, pp. 369-370.
26. Bellini E., Peach genetic improvement: "Mara Dolce", new nectarine with organoleptic value, Acta Hortic. 374 (1996) 39-41.
27. Crisosto C., Crisosto G., Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid meeting flesh peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 38 (2005) 239-246.
28. Moreau-Rio M., Scandella D., Vnien S., Pĉhes et nectarines. Image et perception de la qualit, analyse sensorielle, Infos-Ctifl 108 (1995) 12-17.
29. Benedetti S., Buratti S., Spinardi A., Mannino S., Mignani I., Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to characterise peach cultivars and to monitor their ripening stage during shelf-life, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 47 (2008) 181-188.
30. Visai C., Vanoli M., Volatile compound production during growth and ripening of peaches and nectarines, Scientia Hortic. 70 (1997) 15-24.
31. Saevels S., Lammertyn J., Berna A., Veraverbeke E., Di Natale C., Nicolai B., Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30 (2003) 3-14.
32. Cavicchi, L., Profilo qualitativo sensoriale di alcune cultuvar di albicocco, in: Albicocco: Indicazioni varietali e techniche di produczione, Cent. Ric. Prod. Veg. (CRPV) 59, 2000, pp. 55-61.
33. Molt E., Selfa E., Ferriz J., Conesa E., Gutierrez A., An aroma sensor for assessing peach quality, J. Agric. Eng. Res. 72 (1999) 311-316.
34. Di Natale C., Zude-Sasse M., Macagnano A., Paolesse R., Herold B., D'Amico A., Outer product analysis of electronic nose and visible spectra: Application to the measurement of peach fruit characteristics, Anal. Chim. Acta 459 (2002) 107-117.
35. Infante R., Gonzalez J., Early maturing peach embryo rescue and in vitro survival at different fruit growth stages, Acta Hortic. 592 (2002) 89-92.
36. Hernndez Gmez A., Wang J., Hu G, Graca Pereira A., Discrimination of storage shelf-life for mandarin by electronic nose technique, Food Sci. Technol. 40 (2007) 681-689.
37. Azondalou R., Darbellay C., Luisier J., Villettaz J., Amad R., Development of a model for quality assessment of tomatoes an apricots, Swiss Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 36 (2003) 223-233.
38. Parpinello G.P., Fabbri A., Domenichelli S., Mesisca V., Cavicchi L., Versari A., Discrimination of apricot cultivar by gas multisensor array using an artificial neural network, Biosyst. Eng. 97 (2007) 371-378.
39. Plutowska B., Wardencki W., Aromagrams-aromatic profiles in the appreciation of food quality, Food Chem. 101 (2007) 845-872.
40. Brovelli E.A., Brecht J.K., Sherman W.B., Sims C.A., Harrison J.M., Sensory and compositional attributes of melting- and nonmelting-flesh peaches for the fresh market, J. Sci. Food Agric. 79 (1999) 707-712.
41. Costell E., Expectativas del consumidor desde el punto de vista sensorial, Alimentos 13 (1988) 63-67.
42. Giacalone G., Peano C., Iacona T., Iacona C., Consumer testing on local and new cultivars of peach in the Roero area, Piedmont, Italy, Acta Hortic. 713 (2006) 457-460.
43. Jordan J., Shewfelt R., Garner J., Variyam J., Estimating the value of internal quality aspects to consumers, Acta Hortic. 259 (1990) 139-144.