Monitoring the sensorial quality and aroma through an electronic nose in peaches during cold storage

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2073-2078

  Infante, Rodrigo ^a   Farcuh, Macarena ^a   Meneses, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Cold storage; E nose; Maturity parameters; Sensory panel

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 51349152259     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3316     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gomez E and Ledbetter C, Development of volatile compounds during fruit maturation: characterization of apricot and plum x apricot hybrids. J Sci Food Agric 74:541-546 (1997).
2. Fernández-Trujillo JP, Cano A and Artés F, Physiological changes in peaches related to chilling injury and ripening. Postharvest Biol Technol 13:109-119 (1998).
3. Lurie S and Crisosto C, Chilling injury in peach and nectarine. Postharvest Biol Technol 37:195-208 (2005).
4. Crisosto C, Peach quality and postharvest technology. Acta Hortic 713:479-487 (2006).
5. Abbott J, Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Technol 15:207-225 (1999).
6. Predieri S, Ragazzini P and Rondelli R, Sensory evaluation and peach fruit quality. Acta Hortic 713:429-434 (2006).
7. Engel KH, Ramming D, Flath R and Teranishi R, Investigation of volatile constituents in nectarines. 2. Changes in aroma composition during nectarine maturation. J Agric Food Chem 36:1003-1006 (1988).
8. Aubert C and Milhet C, Distribution of the volatile compounds in the different parts of a white-fleshed peach. Food Chem 102:375-384 (2006).
9. Saevels S, Lammertyn J, Berna A, Veraverbeke E, Di Natale C and Nicolaii B, An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life. Postharvest Biol Technol 31:9-19 (2004).
10. Pathange L, Mallikarjunan P, Marini R, O'Keefe S and Vaughan D, Non-destructive evaluation of apple maturity using an electronic nose system. J Food Eng 77:1018-1023 (2006).
11. Saevels S, Lammertyn J, Berna A, Veraverbeke E, Di Natale C and Nicolaii B, Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples. Postharvest Biol Technol 30:3-14 (2003).
12. Berna AJ, Lammertyn S, Buysens C, Di Natale C and Nicolaii B, Mapping consumer liking of tomatoes with fast aroma profiling techniques. Postharvest Biol Technol 38:115-127 (2005).
13. Benedetti S, Buratti S, Spinardi A, Mannino S and Mignani I, Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to characterize peach cultivars and to monitor their ripening stage during shelf-life. Postharvest Biol Technol 47:181-188 (2007).
14. Heintz CM and Kader AA, Procedures for the sensory evaluation of horticultural crops. HortScience 18:18-22 (1983).
15. Infostat, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Primera Edición, Editorial Brujas, Argentina. 368 pp. (2004).
16. Neri F, Pratella GC and Brigati S, Gli indici di maturazione per ottimizzare la qualità organolettica della fruta. Riv Frutticoltura 5:20-29 (2003).
17. Horvat RJ, Chapman GW, Robertson JA, Meredith FI, Scorza R, Callahan AM, et al, Comparison of the volatile compounds from several commercial peach cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 38:234-237 (1990).
18. Di Natale CA, Macagnano E, Martinelli E, Proietti R, Paolesse L, Castellari S, et al, Electronic nose based investigation of the sensorial properties of peaches and nectarines. Sensors Actuators B 77:561-566 (2001).
19. Crisosto C, Stone fruit maturity indices: a descriptive review. Postharvest News Inform 5:65-68 (1994).
20. Horvat RJ and Chapman GW, Comparison of volatile compounds from peach fruit and leaves (cv. Monroe) during maturation. J Agric Food Chem 38:1442-1444 (1990).
21. Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Echeverria G and Puy J, Segregation of peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics. Postharvest Biol Technol 39:10-18 (2006).
22. Infante R, Meneses C and Predieri S, Sensory quality performance of two nectarine flesh typologies exposed to distant market conditions. J Food Qual 31:526-535 (2008).
23. Crisosto C and Crisosto G, Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid meeting flesh peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol 38:239-246 (2005).
24. Meredith FI, Robertson JA and Horvat RJ, Changes in physical and chemical parameters associated with quality and postharvest ripening of Harvester peaches. J Agric Food Chem 37:1210-1214 (1989).
25. Giacalone G, Peano C, Iacona T and Iacona C, Consumer testing on local and new cultivars of peach in the Roero area, Piedmont, Italy. Acta Hortic 713:457-460 (2006).
26. Crisosto C, Mitchell F and Ju Z, Susceptibility to chilling injury of peach, nectarine, and plum cultivars grown in California. HortScience 34:1116-1118 (1999).
27. Visai C and Vanoli M, Volatile compound production during growth and ripening of peaches and nectarines. Sci Hortic 70:15-24 (1997).
28. Robertson J, Meredith F, Horvat R and Senter S, Effect of cold storage and maturity on the physical and chemical characteristics and volatile constituents of peaches (cv. Cresthaven). J Agric Food Chem 38:620-624 (1990).