Understanding consumer acceptance of peach, nectarine and plum cultivars

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 604, Issue , 2003, Pages 115-119

  Crisosto, Carlos H ^a   Crisosto, Gayle ^a   Bowerman, Earl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Degree of liking; In store consumer acceptance tests; Industry surveys; Soluble solids concentration; Stone fruit; Titratable acidity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750340337     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.604.10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Crisosto, C.H. and Crisosto, G.M. 2001. Understanding consumer acceptance of early harvested .Hayward. kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 22:205-213.
2. Crisosto, C.H. and Crisosto, G.M. 2002. Understanding American and Chinese consumer acceptance of .Redglobe. table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:155-162.
3. Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G.M. and Metheney, P. 2003. Consumer acceptance of .Brooks. and .Bing. cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual color. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28:159-167.
4. Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G.M. and Ritenour, M.A. 2002. Testing the reliability of skin color as an indicator of quality for early season .Brooks. (Prunus avium L.) cherry. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:147-154.
5. Crisosto, C.H., Mitchell, F.G. and Johnson, S. 1995. Factors in fresh market stone fruit quality. Postharvest News and Information 6:17-21.
6. Crisosto, C.H., Johnson, R.S. and DeJong, T. 1997. Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality. HortScience 32(5):820-823.
7. DeJong, T.M., Johnson, R.S., Bryla, D., Doyle, J.F. and Ramming, D. 2002. Evaluation of size controlling rootstocks for California peach production. 2001 Research Report to the California Tree Fruit Agreement. p. 113-120.
8. Kader, A.A. 1994. Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Perishables Handling Newsletter No. 80:2.
9. Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. 1998. Acceptance and preference testing. p. 430-479. In: H.T. Lawless and H. Heymann (eds), Sensory Evaluation of Food, Principles and Practices. Chapman and Hall, New York.
10. Parker, D., Ziberman, D. and Moulton, K. 1991. How quality relates to price in California fresh peaches. Calif. Agri. 45:14-16.
11. Pehrson, J.E. and Ivans, E.M. 1988. Variability in early season navel orange clone maturity and consumer acceptance. Citriculture: Proc. Sixth Intl. Citrus Congress. p. 1631-1635.
12. Robertson, J.A., Meredith, F.I. and Scorza, R. 1988. Characteristics of fruit from highand low-quality peach cultivars. HortScience 23:1032-1034.
13. Romani, R.J. and Jennings, W.G. 1971. Stone fruits. p. 411-436. In: A.C. Hulme (ed.), Biochemistry of Fruits and their Products, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York.