Feasibility of the adaptive and automatic presentation of tasks (ADAPT) system for rehabilitation of upper extremity function post-stroke

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Choi, Younggeun ^a,b   Gordon, James ^a   Park, Hyeshin ^a   Schweighofer, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Dankook University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

AGED; ARM; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 79960982815     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-42     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Desrosiers J, Malouin F, Bourbonnais D, Richards CL, Rochette A, Bravo G, Clin Rehabil 2003 17 6 666 73 10.1191/0269215503cr662oa 12971712 (Pubitemid 37063055)
2. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D, Jama 2006 296 17 2095 104 10.1001/jama.296.17.2095 17077374 (Pubitemid 44664704)
3. Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Lincoln NB, Willis D, Philips SA, Juby LC, Berman P, Stroke 1996 27 1 18 23 10.1161/01.STR.27.1.18 8553397 (Pubitemid 26008289)
4. Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Keith RA, Cowell KS, Soc Sci Med 1987 24 6 529 33 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90342-X 3589748 (Pubitemid 17058473)
5. Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? Mackey F, Ada L, Heard R, Adams R, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 77 10 1066 70 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90070-2 8857888 (Pubitemid 26339633)
6. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Lang C, Macdonald J, Reisman D, Boyd L, Kimberley Jacobson T, Schindler-Ivens S, Hornby T, Ross S, Scheets P, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 90 10 1692 8 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005 19801058
7. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT, Arch Neurol 1997 54 4 443 6 9109746 (Pubitemid 27172864)
8. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor PC, Van der Loos Machiel HF, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 6 663 73 11321002 (Pubitemid 34117273)
9. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 6 653 62 11321001
10. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84:6 915 20 12808550 (Pubitemid 36682345)
11. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: A robot for wrist rehabilitation. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Williams D, Celestino J, Charles SK, Lynch D, Hogan N, Ieee Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2007 15 3 327 335 17894265 (Pubitemid 47460417)
12. HandCARE: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. Dovat L, Lambercy O, Gassert R, Maeder T, Milner T, Leong TC, Burdet E, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008 16 6 582 91 19144590
13. Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Krebs HI, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, Hogan N, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96 8 4645 9 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4645 10200316 (Pubitemid 29190390)
14. Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT, Aisen ML, Edelstein L, Diels C, Technol Health Care 1999 7 6 419 23 10665675 (Pubitemid 30035872)
15. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 7 952 9 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 12098155 (Pubitemid 34747579)
16. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Bever CT Jr, Bravata DM, Duncan PW, Corn BH, Maffucci AD, Nadeau SE, Conroy SS, Powell JM, Huang GD, Peduzzi P, N Engl J Med 2010 362 19 1772 83 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 20400552
17. AR-REHAB: An Augmented Reality Framework for Poststroke-Patient Rehabilitation. Alamri A, Jongeun C, Saddik El A, Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on 2010 59 10 2554 2563
18. Movement-Produced Stimulation in the Development of Visually Guided Behavior. Held R, Hein A, J Comp Physiol Psychol 1963 56 872 6 14050177
19. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW, Science 1996 272 5269 1791 4 10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 8650578 (Pubitemid 26256399)
20. When practice makes perfect. Karni A, Lancet 1995 345 8946 395 7845150
21. Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Boroojerdi B, Cohen L, Hallett M, Exp Brain Res 2001 136 4 431 8 10.1007/s002210000614 11291723 (Pubitemid 32193843)
22. Lesions of the Basal forebrain cholinergic system impair task acquisition and abolish cortical plasticity associated with motor skill learning. Conner JM, Culberson A, Packowski C, Chiba AA, Tuszynski MH, Neuron 2003 38 5 819 29 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00288-5 12797965 (Pubitemid 36694787)
23. Neural substrate for the effects of passive training on sensorimotor cortical representation: a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects. Carel C, Loubinoux I, Boulanouar K, Manelfe C, Rascol O, Celsis P, Chollet F, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000 20 3 478 84 10724112 (Pubitemid 30164892)
24. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen LG, Brain 2003 126 Pt 4 866 72 12615644 (Pubitemid 36372985)
25. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Duncan PW, Tpoics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1997 3 1 20 (Pubitemid 27100567)
26. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 20 10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 19531254
27. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 5 619 30 10.1682/JRRD.2005.03.0056 17123203 (Pubitemid 44759899)
28. Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Krebs H, Palazzolo J, Dipietro L, Volpe B, Hogan N, AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS 2003 15 1 7 20 10.1023/A:1024494031121
29. Adaptive assistance for guided force training in chronic stroke. Kahn LE, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS San Francisco, CA 2004
30. Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy. Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Hogan N, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 3 325 34 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.850423 16200756 (Pubitemid 41416013)
31. Disablement and Quality of Life after Stroke. Ahlsio B, Britton M, Murray V, Theorell T, Stroke 1984 15 5 886 890 10.1161/01.STR.15.5.886 6236588 (Pubitemid 14027507)
32. Stroke Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimise Motor Skill. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann 2003
33. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ, Stroke 1999 30 10 2131 40 10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131 10512918 (Pubitemid 29473260)
34. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Bouchard JP, Brunet D, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993 74 6 612 20 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90159-8 8503751 (Pubitemid 23172763)
35. Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes. Fisher BE, Sullivan KJ, Top Stroke Rehabil 2001 8 3 31 44 10.1310/B3JD-NML4- V1FB-5YHG 14523736 (Pubitemid 33095709)
36. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J, Clin Rehabil 2004 18 833 62 10.1191/0269215504cr843oa 15609840 (Pubitemid 39642264)
37. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 85 4 620 8 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.027 15083439 (Pubitemid 38881052)
38. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005 19 3 194 205 10.1177/1545968305276663 16093410 (Pubitemid 41216295)
39. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: A pilot study. Krebs H, Mernoff S, Fasoli S, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N, NeuroRehabilitation 2008 23 81 87 18356591 (Pubitemid 352038564)
40. The influence of goals on the kinematics of reaching forllowing stroke. van Vliet P, Kerwin DG, Sheridan MR, Fentem P, Neurology Report 1995 19 11 16
41. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, Tickle-Degnen L, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000 81 1 95 101 10638883 (Pubitemid 30036881)
42. Automated Constraint-Induced Therapy Extension (AutoCITE) for movement deficits after stroke. Lum PS, Taub E, Schwandt D, Postman M, Hardin P, Uswatte G, J Rehabil Res Dev 2004 41 3A 249 58 10.1682/JRRD.2003.06.0092 15543442
43. AutoCITE: automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists. Taub E, Lum PS, Hardin P, Mark VW, Uswatte G, Stroke 2005 36 6 1301 4 10.1161/01.STR.0000166043.27545.e8 15879335 (Pubitemid 40798759)
44. Development of ADLER:The Activities of Daily Living Exercise Robot. Johnson MJ, Wisneski KJ, J A, Nathan D, S R, IEEE-EMBS Biomedical Robotics (BioRob 2006) Pisa, Italy 2006
45. Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning. Choi Y, Qi F, Gordon J, Schweighofer N, J Mot Behav 2008 40 4 273 80 10.3200/JMBR.40.4.273- 280 18628104 (Pubitemid 352009531)
46. Grip force modulation after stroke: what is the optimal schedule? Goh H, Choi YG, Stewart JC, Lewthwaite R, Winstein CJ, Schweighofer N, WCPT Vancouver, Canada 2007
47. A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Magill RA, Hall KG, Human Movement Science 9 1990 241 289
48. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Plautz E, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ, Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000 74 27 55 10.1006/nlme.1999.3934 10873519 (Pubitemid 30470907)
49. Failure of motor learning for large initial errors. Sanger TD, Neural Comput 2004 16 9 1873 86 10.1162/0899766041336431 15265326 (Pubitemid 38932660)
50. Mind in Society. Vygotsky LS, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1978
51. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Deci E, Ryan RM, New York: Plenum 1985
52. Learning what and how in a human motor task. Brooks V, Hilperath F, Brooks M, Ross H, Freund H, Learn Mem 1995 2 225 42 10.1101/lm.2.5.225 10467577
53. Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: Theoretical and historical perspectives. Gordon J, Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation Aspen Publishers: Rockville, MD, Carr JH, Shepherd RB, 2 2000 1 31
54. A robotic system to provide movement therapy. Erlandson RF, deBear P, Kristy K, Dijkers M, Wu S, Proc 5th Int Service Robot Conf Detroit, MI 1990
55. Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. Emken JL, Benitez R, Sideris A, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neurophysiol 2007 97 6 3997 4006 10.1152/jn.01095.2006 17392418 (Pubitemid 47082400)
56. An Adaptive Automated Robotic Task-Practice System for Rehabilitation of Arm Functions After Stroke. Choi Y, Gordon J, Kim D, Schweighofer N, IEEE Trans in Robotics 2009 25 3 556 568
57. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. Krebs H, Hogan N, Aisen M, Volpe B, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998 6 1 75 87 10.1109/86.662623 9535526 (Pubitemid 28167922)
58. Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. Dijkers M, deBear P, Erlandson R, Kristy K, Geer D, Nichols A, J Rehabil Res Dev 1991 28 2 33 44 10.1682/JRRD.1991.04.0033 2066869
59. An Active Approach to Characterization and Recognition of Functionality and Functional Properties. Bogoni L, Bajcsy R, Department of Computer & Information Science, University of Pennsylvania 1993 1993
60. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Ryan R, Deci E, Am Psychol 2000 55 1 68 78 11392867
61. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, Delconte C, Micera S, Carrozza M, Dario P, Minuco G, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 3 10.1186/1743-0003-4-3 17309790 (Pubitemid 46328252)
62. An Actuated Finger Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation Following Stroke. Worsnopp TT, Peshkin MA, Colgate JE, Kamper DG, IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics Noordwijk, The Netherlands 2007
63. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. Huang V, Krakauer J, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 5 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5 19243614
64. Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. Ada L, Dorsch S, Canning C, Aust J Physiother 2006 52 4 241 8 10.1016/S0004-9514(06)70003-4 17132118 (Pubitemid 44941645)
65. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD, J Mot Behav 2004 36 2 212 24 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224 15130871 (Pubitemid 38580119)
66. Towards integrative neurorehabilitation science. Kwakkel G, Physiother Res Int 2009 14 3 137 46 10.1002/pri.446 19634129
67. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Krakauer JW, Curr Opin Neurol 2006 19 1 84 90 10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915. cc 16415682 (Pubitemid 43172710)