An adaptive automated robotic task-practice system for rehabilitation of arm functions after stroke

IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 556-568

  Choi, Younggeum ^a   Gordon, James ^b   Kim, Duckho ^b   Schweighofer, Nicolas ^b  

^a Department of Computer Science ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Admittance controller; Locally weighted learning; Motor schedule; Neurorehabilitation; Rehabilitation robotics; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADMITTANCE CONTROLLER; LOCALLY WEIGHTED LEARNING; NEUROREHABILITATION; REHABILITATION ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

CONTROLLERS; DYNAMICS; EDUCATION; MOTORS; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; SCHEDULING;

ROBOTS;

EID: 67649252923     PISSN: 15523098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2009.2019787     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. J. Desrosiers, F. Malouin, D. Bourbonnais, C. L. Richards, A. Rochette, and G. Bravo, "Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: Relation to handicap," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 17, pp. 666-673, 2003.
2. W. J. Coster, S. M. Haley, P. L. Andres, L. H. Ludlow, T. L. Bond, and P. S. Ni, "Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: Personal care and instrumental activities domain," Med. Care, vol. 42, pp. I62-I72, 2004.
3. J. H. Carr and R. B. Shepherd, Stroke Rehabilitation - Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill. London, U.K.: Butterworth/Heinemann, 2003.
4. S. Wolf, S. Blanton, H. Baer, J. Breshears, and A. J. Butler, "Repetitive task practice: A critical review of constraint induced therapy in stroke," Neurologist, vol. 8, pp. 325-338, 2002.
5. G. Kwakkel, R. C.Wagenaar, J.W. Twisk, G. J. Lankhorst, and J. C. Koetsier, "Intensity of leg and arm training after primarymiddle-cerebral artery stroke: A randomized trial," Lancet vol. 354, pp. 191-196, 1999.
6. E. Taub, G. Uswatte, and R. D. Pidikiti, "Contstraint-induced (CI) movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - A clinical review," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. vol. 36, pp. 237-251, 1999.
7. N. B. Lincoln, D. Willis, S. A. Philips, L. C. Juby, and P. Berman, "Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients," Stroke, vol. 27, pp. 18-23, 1996.
8. R. A. Keith and K. S. Cowell, "Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals," Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 24, pp. 529-533, 1987.
9. M. L. Aisen, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, F. McDowell, and B. T. Volpe, "The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke," Arch. Neurol., vol. 54, pp. 443-446, 1997.
10. C. G. Burgar, P. S. Lum, P. C. Shor, and H. F. M. Van Der Loos, "Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The Palo Alto VA/ Stanford experience," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 37, pp. 663-673, 2000.
11. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, J. L. Emken, and S. C. Cramer, "Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery," Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 497-525, 2004.
12. S. Hesse, G. Schulte-Tigges, M. Konrad, A. Bardeleben, and C. Werner, "Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 84, pp. 915-920, 2003.
13. S. E. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, J. Stein, W. R. Frontera, and N. Hogan, "Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 84, pp. 477-482, 2003.
14. L. R. MacClellan, D. D. Bradham, J. Whitall, B. Volpe, P. D. Wilson, J. Ohlhoff, C. Meister, N. Hogan, H. I. Krebs, and C. T. Bever, "Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 42, pp. 717-722, 2005.
15. B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelsteinn, C. M. Diels, and M. L. Aisen, "Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years," Neurology, vol. 53, pp. 1874-1876, 1999.
16. P. Lum, D. Reinkensmeyer, R. Mahoney, W. Z. Rymer, and C. Burgar, "Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: Current status and challenges to clinical acceptance," Top Stroke Rehabil., vol. 8, pp. 40-53, 2002.
17. H. I. Krebs, M. Ferraro, S. P. Buerger, M. J. Newbery, A. Makiyama, M. Sandmann, D. Lynch, B. T. Volpe, and N. Hogan, "Rehabilitation robotics: Pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 1, p. 5, 2004.
18. H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, D. Williams, J. Celestino, S. K. Charles,D. Lynch, and N. Hogan, "Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: A robot for wrist rehabilitation," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 15, pp. 327-335, 2007.
19. L. E. Kahn, W. Z. Rymer, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Adaptive assistance for guided force training in chronic stroke," presented at the 26th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA, 2004.
20. L. Dipietro, M. Ferraro, J. J. Palazzolo, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, and N. Hogan, "Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 325-334, Sep. 2005.
21. J. Gordon, "Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: Theoretical and historical perspectives," in Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation, 2nd ed., J. H. Carr and R. B. Shepherd, Eds. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 2000, pp. 1-31.
22. B. Ahlsio, M. Britton, V. Murray, and T. Theorell, "Disablement and quality of life after stroke," Stroke, vol. 15, pp. 886-890, 1984.
23. B. E. Fisher and K. J. Sullivan, "Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes," Top Stroke Rehabil., vol. 8, pp. 31-44, 2001.
24. R. P. V. Peppen, G. Kwakkel, S. Wood-Dauphinee, H. J. Hendriks, P. J. V. der Wees, and J. Dekker, "The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence," Clin. Rehabil., vol. 18, pp. 833-862, 2004.
25. N. A. Bayona, J. Bitensky, K. Salter, and R. Teasell, "The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies," Top Stroke Rehabil., vol. 12, pp. 58-65, 2005.
26. P. van Vliet, D. G. Kerwin,M. R. Sheridan, and P. Fentem, "The influence of goals on the kinematics of reaching forllowing stroke," Neurol. Rep., vol. 19, pp. 11-16, 1995.
27. C. Wu, C. A. Trombly, K. Lin, and L. Tickle-Degnen, "A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: Influences of object availability," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 81, pp. 95-101, 2000.
28. Y. Choi, F. Qi, J. Gordon, and N. Schweighofer, "Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning," J. Mot. Behav., vol. 40, pp. 273-280, 2008.
29. H. Goh, Y. G. Choi, J. C. Stewart, R. Lewthwaite, C. J. Winstein, and N. Schweighofer, "Grip force modulation after stroke: What is the optimal schedule?," presented at the WCPT, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2007.
30. R. A. Magill and K. G. Hall, "A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition," in Human Movement Science, 9th ed. New York: Elsevier, 1990.
31. R. J. Nudo, B. M. Wise, F. SiFuentes, and G. W. Milliken, "Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct," Sci., vol. 272, pp. 1791-1794, 1996.
32. E. Plautz, G. W. Milliken, and R. J. Nudo, "Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: Role of use versus learning," Neurobiol. Learn Mem., vol. 74, pp. 27-55, 2000.
33. T. D. Sanger, "Failure of motor learning for large initial errors," iNeural Comput., vol. 16, pp. 1873-1886, 2004.
34. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978.
35. E. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
36. P. S. Lum, E. Taub, D. Schwandt, M. Postman, P. Hardin, and G. Uswatte, "Automated constraint-induced therapy extension (AutoCITE) for movement deficits after stroke," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 41, pp. 249-258, 2004.
37. E. Taub, P. S. Lum, P. Hardin, V. W. Mark, and G. Uswatte, "AutoCITE: Automated delivery of CI therapy with reduced effort by therapists," Stroke, vol. 36, pp. 1301-1304, 2005.
38. R. F. Erlandson, P. deBear, K. Kristy, M. Dijkers, and S. Wu, "A robotic system to provide movement therapy," presented at the 5th Int. Service Robot Conf., Detroit, MI, 1990.
39. M. P. Dijkers, P. C. deBear, R. F. Erlandson, K. Kristy, D. M. Geer, and A. Nichols, "Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: A pilot study," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 28, pp. 33-44, 1991.
40. M. J. Johnson, K. J. Wisneski, J. Anderson, D. Nathan, and R. Smith, "Development of ADLER: The activities of daily living exercise robot," presented at IEEE-EMBS Biomed. Robot. (BioRob), Pisa, Italy, 2006.
41. Y. G. Choi, J. Gordon, and N. Schweighofer, "ADAPT - Adaptive automated robotic task practice system for stroke rehabilitation," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Pasadena, CA, 2008, pp. 2471-2476.
42. C. Smith and H. I. Christensen, "Using COTS to construct a high performance robot arm," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robots Automation Roma, Italy, April 10-14, 2007, pp. 4056-4063.
43. Y. Yokokohji, R. L. Hollis, and T. Kanade, "WYSIWYF display: A visual/haptic interface to virtual environment," Presence-Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 8, pp. 412-434, 1999.
44. B. M. Colton and J. M. Hollerbach, "Identification of nonlinear passive devices for haptic simulations," in Proc. Symp. Haptic Interfaces Virtual Environ. Teleoperator Syst., 2005, pp. 363-368.
45. S. Schaal and C. G. Atkeson, "Constructive incremental learning from only local information," Neural Comput., vol. 10, pp. 2047-2084, 1998.
46. H. Olsson, K. Astrom, C. de Wit, M. Gafvert, and P. Lischinsky, "Friction models and friction compensation," Eur. J. Contr., vol. 4, pp. 176-195, 1998.
47. C. Richard, "On the identification and haptic display of friction," Ph.D dissertation, Dept. Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 2000.
48. C. Swindells and K. E. MacLean, "Capturing the dynamics of mechanical knobs," in Proc. World Haptics Conf., 2007, pp. 194-199.
49. Y. G. Choi and N. Schweighofer, "Capturing and modeling a tool dynamics for adaptive task practice in stroke rehabilitation," presented at the Workshop Assistive Technol. IROS, San Diego, CA, 2007.
50. J. H. Cauraugh and S. Kim, "Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one - Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements," Stroke, vol. 33, pp. 1589-1594, 2002.
51. J. Whitall, S. M. Waller, K. H. C. Silver, and R. F. Macko, "Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke," Stroke, vol. 31, pp. 2390-2395, 2000.
52. M. C. Cirstea, B. Leduc, and M. Levin, "Hemiparetic patients recruit additional degrees of freedom to compensate lost motor function," presented at 12th Congr. Int. Soc. Electrophysiol. Kinesiol., Montreal, QC, Canada, 1998.
53. S. L. Wolf, P. A. Catlin, M. Ellis, A. L. Archer, B. Morgan, and A. Piacentino, "Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke," Stroke, vol. 32, pp. 1635-1639, 2001.
54. G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, M. Vignolo, and K. McCulloch, "Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use," Stroke, vol. 36, pp. 2493-2496, 2005.