Phylogenetic versus functional signals in the evolution of form-function relationships in terrestrial vision

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2245-2257

  Motani, Ryosuke ^a   Schmitz, Lars ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; Form function relationship; Phylogenetic bias; Visual optics

Indexed keywords

BROWNIAN MOTION; CORRELATION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION; EYE; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EYE; PHYLOGENY; VISION, OCULAR;

AMNIOTA;

EID: 79960767356     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01271.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Astúa, D. 2009. Evolution of scapula size and shape in didelphid marsupials (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae). Evolution 63:2438-2456.
2. Baudat, G., and F. Anouar. 2000. Generalized discriminant analysis using a kernel approach. Neural Comput. 12:2385-2404.
3. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
4. Castenholz, A. 1984. The eye of Tarsius. Pp. 303-318 in C. Niemitz ed. Biology of Tarsiers. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart, New York.
5. Charman, W. N. 1991. The vertebrate dioptric apparatus. Pp. 82-117 in J. R. Cronly-Dillon and R. L. Gregory, eds., Evolution of the eye and visual system. CRC Press, Inc, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, Boston.
6. Dimcheff, D. E., S. V. Drovetski, and D. P. Mindell. 2002. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24:203-215.
7. Fain, M. G., C. Krajewski, and P. Houde. 2007. Phylogeny of "core Gruiformes" (Aves: Grues) and resolution of the Limpkin-Sungrebe problem. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43:515-529.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
9. Fisher, R. A. 1938. The statistical utilization of multiple measurements. Ann. Eugenic. 8:376-386.
10. Garland, T. Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
11. Garland, T. Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
12. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am. Zool. 39:374-388.
13. Giugliano, L. G., R. G. Collevatti, and G. R. Colli. 2007. Molecular dating and phylogenetic relationships among Teiidae (Squamata) inferred by molecular and morphological data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 45:168-179.
14. Glahn, H. R. 1968. Canonical correlation and its relationship to discriminant analysis and multiple regression. J. Atmos. Sci. 25:23-31.
15. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 326:119-157.
16. Griffiths, C. S., G. F. Barrowclough, J. G. Groth, and L. A. Mertz. 2007. Phylogeny, diversity, and classification of the Accipitridae based on DNA sequences of the RAG-1 exon. J. Avian Biol. 38:587-602.
17. Griffiths, C. S., G. F. Barrowclough, J. G. Groth, and L. Mertz. 2004. Phylogeny of the Falconidae (Aves): a comparison of the efficacy of morphological, mitochondrial, and nuclear data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32:101-109.
18. Hall, M. I., and C. F. Ross. 2007. Eye shape and activity pattern in birds. J. Zool. 271:437-444.
19. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
20. Harmon, L. J., J. T. Weir, C. D. Brock, R. E. Glor, and W. Challenger. 2008. GEIGER. Bioinformatics 24:129-131.
21. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and A. Buja. 1994. Flexible discriminant analysis by optimal scoring. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89:1-41.
22. Hinic-Frlog, S., and R. Motani. 2010. Relationship between osteology and aquatic locomotion in birds: determining modes of locomotion in extinct Ornithurae. J. Evol. Biol. 23:372-385.
23. Honda, M., H. Ota, M. Kobayashi, J. Nabhitabhata, H.-S. Yong, S. Sengoku, and T. Hikida. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of the family agamidae (reptilia: iguania) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 17:527-537.
24. Janson, S., and J. Vegelius. 1980. A general discriminant analysis based on e-correlation coefficients. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 40:911-922.
25. Jønsson, K. A., and J. Fjeldså. 2006. A phylogenetic supertree of oscine passerine birds Aves: Passeri). Zool. Scripta 35:149-186.
26. Kembel, S. W., D. D. Ackerly, S. P. Blomberg, W. K. Cornwell, P. D. Cowan, M. R. Helmus, H. Morlon, and C. O. Webb. 2009. picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. R package version 1.0-0. Available at:.
27. Kimball, R. T., and E. L. Braun. 2008. A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non-feathered facial traits. J. Avian Biol. 39:438-445.
28. Kirk, E. C. 2004. Comparative morphology of the eye in primates. Anat. Rec. A 281A:1095-1103.
29. Lauder, G. V. 1995. On the inference of function from structure. Pp. 1-18 in J. J. Thomason, ed. Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Lerner, H. R. L., and D. P. Mindell. 2005. Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37:327-346.
31. Lerner, H. R. L., M. C. Klaver, and D. P. Mindell. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics of buteonine birds of prey (Accipitridae). Auk 304:304-315.
32. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2009. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.72.
33. Martin, G. R. 1982. An owl's eye: schematic optics and visual performance in Strix aluco L. J. Comp. Physiol. A 145:341-349.
34. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667.
35. Motani, R. 2008. Combining uniformitarian and historical data to interpret how Earth environment influenced the evolution of Ichthyopterygia. Paleontol. Soc. Papers 14:147-164.
36. Nittinger, F., E. Haring, W. Pinsker, M. Wink, and A. Gamuf. 2005. Out of Africa? Phylogenetic relationships between Falco biarmicus and the other hierofalcons (Aves: Falconidae). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 43:321-331.
37. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
38. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
39. Peters, J. L., K. G. McCracken, Y. N. Zhuravlev, Y. Lu, R. E. Wilson, K. P. Johnson, and K. E. Omland. 2005. Phylogenetics of wigeons and allies (Anatidae: Anas): the importance of sampling multiple loci and multiple individuals. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35:209-224.
40. Plummer, T. W., L. C. Bishop, and F. Hertel. 2008. Habitat preference of extant African bovids based on astragalus morphology: operationalizing ecomorphology for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35:3016-3027.
41. Pons, J.-M., A. Hassanin, and P.-A. Crochet. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships within the Laridae (Charadriiformes: Aves) inferred from mitochondrial markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37:686-699.
42. Rao, C. R., and H. Toutenburg. 1999. Linear models: least squares and alternatives, 2nd Edition. Springer, New York. pp. 427.
43. Revell, L. J. 2009. Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63:3258-3268.
44. Revell, L. J., and A. S. Harrison. 2008. PCCA: a program for phylogenetic canonical correlation analysis. Bioinformatics 24:1018-1020.
45. Rocha, S., M. Vences, F. Glaw, D. Posada, and D. J. Harris. 2009. Multigene phylogeny of Malagasy day geckos of the genus Phelsuma. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52:530-537.
46. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2159.
47. Schmitz, L. 2009. Quantitative estimates of visual performance features in fossil birds. J. Morphol. 270:759-773.
48. Schmitz, L., and R. Motani. 2010. Morphological differences between eyeballs of nocturnal and diurnal amniotes revisited from optical perspectives of visual environments. Vision Res. 50:936-943.
49. Wainwright, P. C. 1994. Functional morphology as a tool in ecological research. Pp. 42-59 in P. C. Wainwright and S. M. Reilly, eds. Ecological morphology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
50. Wainwright, P. C., M. E. Alfaro, D. I. Bolnick, and C. D. Husley. 2005. Many-to-one mapping of form to function: a general principle in organismal design? Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:256-262.
51. Walls, G. L. 1942. The Vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI.
52. Warrant, E. J. 2008. Nocturnal vision. Pp. 53-86 in R. H. Masland, and T. Albright, eds. The senses: a comprehensive reference (vision II, Vol. 2). Academic Press, Oxford, UK.
53. Warton, D. I., I. J. Wright, D. S. Falster, and M. Westoby. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. 81:259-291.
54. Wiens, J. J., and B. D. Hollingsworth. 2000. War of the iguanas: conflicting molecular and morphological phylogenies and long-branch attraction in iguanid lizards. Syst. Biol. 49:143-159.
55. Zheng, W., L. Zhao, and C. Zou. 2004. A modified algorithm for Generalized Discriminant Analysis. Neural Comput. 16:1283-1297.