Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 3258-3268

  Revell, Liam J ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Data transformation; Evolutionary regression; Least squares; Linear regression; PCA; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Principal components analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA PROCESSING; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; PHYLOGENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSFORM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70350280178     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00804.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ackerly, D. D., and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Am. Nat. 152 : 767 791.
2. Andrews, C. B., S. A. Mackenzie, and T. R. Gregory. 2009. Genome size and wing parameters in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276 : 55 61.
3. Blomberg, S. P., and T. Garland, Jr. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 899 910.
4. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57 : 717 745.
5. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164 : 683 695.
6. Butler, M. A., T. W. Schoener, and J. B. Losos. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54 : 259 272.
7. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39 : 1335 1351.
8. Clobert, J., T. Garland, Jr., and R. Barbault. 1998. The evolution of demographic tactics in lizards: a test of some hypotheses concerning life history evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 11 : 329 364.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 : 1 15.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19 : 445 471.
11. Freckleton, R. P. 2002. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. J. Anim. Ecol. 71 : 542 545.
12. Freckleton, R. P. 2009. The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 22 : 1367 1375.
13. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160 : 712 726.
14. García-Berthou, E. 2001. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. J. Anim. Ecol. 70 : 708 711.
15. Garland, T., Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155 : 346 364.
16. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41 : 18 32.
17. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42 : 265 292. (Pubitemid 23971839)
18. Garland, T., Jr., A. F. Bennett, and E. L. Rezende. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208 : 3015 3035.
19. Glossip, D., and J. B. Losos. 1997. Ecological correlates of number of subdigital lamellae in anoles. Herpetologica 53 : 192 199.
20. Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41 : 587 638.
21. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 326 : 119 157.
22. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51 : 1341 1351.
23. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50 : 1404 1417.
24. Hansen, T. F., J. Pienaar, and S. H. Orzack. 2008. A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment. Evolution 62 : 1965 1977.
25. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
26. Hulsey, C. D., M. C. Mims, and J. T. Streelman. 2007. Do constructional constraints influence cichlid craniofacial diversification? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274 : 1867 1875.
27. Humphries, J. M., F. L. Bookstein, B. Chernoff, G. R. Smith, R. L. Elder, and S. G. Poss. 1981. Multivariate discrimination by shape in relation to size. Syst. Zool. 30 : 291 308.
28. Jolicoeur, P., P. Pirlot, G. Baron, and H. Stephan. 1984. Brain structure and correlation patterns in Insectivora, Chiroptera, and Primates. Syst. Zool. 33 : 14 29.
29. Lavin, S. R., W. H. Karasov, A. R. Ives, K. M. Middleton, and T. Garland, Jr. 2008. Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 81 : 526 550.
30. Manly, B. F. J. 2005. Multivariate statistical methods: a primer, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall / CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
31. Martins, E. P. 1994. Estimating the rate of phenotypic evolution from comparative data. Am. Nat. 144 : 193 209.
32. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland, Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45 : 534 557.
33. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149 : 646 667.
34. McCoy, M. W., B. J. Bolker, C. W. Osenberg, B. G. Miner, and J. R. Vonesh. 2006. Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments. Oecologia 148 : 547 554.
35. Nunn, C. L., and R. A. Barton. 2001. Comparative methods for studying primate adaptation and allometry. Evol. Anthropol. 10 : 81 98.
36. O'Meara, B. C., C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60 : 922 933.
37. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255 : 37 45.
38. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401 : 877 884.
39. Paradis, E. 2006. Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R. Springer, New York, NY.
40. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20 : 289 290.
41. Pontzer, H., and J. M. Kamilar. 2009. Great ranging associated with greater reproductive investment in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 : 192 196.
42. Price, T. 1997. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352 : 519 529.
43. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
44. Rencher, A. C. 2002. Methods of multivariate analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
45. Rencher, A. C., and G. B. Schaalje. 2008. Linear models in statistics, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
46. Revell, L. J. 2007. Testing the genetic constraint hypothesis in a phylogenetic context: a simulation study. Evolution 61 : 2720 2727.
47. Revell, L. J. 2008. On the analysis of evolutionary change along single branches in a phylogeny. Am. Nat. 172 : 140 147.
48. Revell, L. J., and D. C. Collar. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood. Evolution 63 : 1090 1100.
49. Revell, L. J., and L. J. Harmon. 2008. Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10 : 311 321.
50. Revell, L. J., and A. S. Harrison. 2008. PCCA: a program for phylogenetic canonical correlation analysis. Bioinformatics 24 : 1018 1020.
51. Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, R. B. Langerhans, and J. J. Kolbe. 2007. A phylogenetic approach to determining the importance of constraint on phenotypic evolution in the neotropical lizard Anolis cristatellus. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9 : 261 282.
52. Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, and D. C. Collar. 2008. Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst. Biol. 57 : 591 601.
53. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55 : 2143 2160.
54. Rohlf, F. J. 2006. A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution 60 : 1509 1515.
55. Rohlf, F. J., and F. L. Bookstein. 1987. A comment on shearing as a method for "size correction". Syst. Zool. 36 : 356 367.
56. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50 : 1766 1774.
57. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. Ø. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51 : 1699 1711.
58. The Mathworks 2006. Matlab: the language of technical computing (R2006a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.