Applying learning strategy questionnaires: Problems and possibilities

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 91-109

  Schellings, Gonny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Learning strategy questionnaires; Think aloud method

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960723205     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-011-9069-5     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Admiraal, W., Hoeksma, M., Duin, G., & Janssen, J. (2011). Assessment evidence of teacher competences in video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity and consequential validity.
2. Alexander, P. A. (2006). Psychology in learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
3. Anderson, D., Nashon, S., & Thomas, G. P. (2009). Evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition. Research in Science Education, 39, 181-195.
4. Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect the learning? Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 39-58.
5. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
6. Blom, S., & Severiens, S. E. (2008). Engagement in self-regulated deep learning of successful immigrant and non-immigrant students in inner city schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(1), 41-58.
7. Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2007). Measuring strategic processing: Comparing task-specific self-reports to traces. Metacognition and Learning, 2(1), 1-20.
8. Broekkamp, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2007). Students' adaptation of study strategies when preparing for classroom tests. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 401-428.
9. Brown, W. F. (1986). Effective study test. Iowa City: ACT.
10. Butler, D. L., & Cartier, S. C. (2004). Promoting effective task interpretation as an important work habit: A key to successful teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 106, 1729-1758.
11. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
12. Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? Metacognition and Learning, 1(3), 229-247.
13. Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1987). Learning style inventory. Lawrence: Price Systems.
14. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategies inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-346.
15. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
16. Entwistle, N. J., & Tait, H. (1995). The revised approaches to studying inventory. Centre for research on learning and instruction. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
17. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT.
18. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112.
19. Hadwin, A. L., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J. C., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students' self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 477-487.
20. Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2009). How can we know that they think what we mean? Investigating students' self-reports of self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference for European Research on Learning and Instruction, EARLI, Amsterdam, August 25-29th.
21. Iran-Nejad, A., & Chissom, B. S. (1992). Contributions of active and dynamic selfregulation to learning. Innovative Higher Education, 17, 125-136.
22. Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C. R., et al. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 139-151.
23. Kardash, C. M., & Amlund, J. T. (1991). Self-reported learning strategies and learning from expository text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 117-138.
24. Kolb, D. (1999). Learning-style inventory-version 3. Boston: Hay/McBer Training Resources Group.
25. Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., The RSAT Development Team, Levinstein, I., & Boonthum, C. (2011). Assessing comprehension during reading with the reading strategy assessment tool (RSAT).
26. Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006a). Metacognitive activities in text studying and problem solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209-237.
27. Meijer, J., Elshout-Mohr, M., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M., Meeus, W., & Tempelaar, D. (2006b). Construction and validation of a questionnaire on metacognition. Paper presented at the Second bi-annual conference of the special interest group on Metacognition of EARLI, Cambridge.
28. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
29. Michael, W. B., Michael, J. J., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1988). Study attitudes and methods survey. San Diego: EDITS.
30. Muis, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2007). Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 177-195.
31. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
32. Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C. A. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2011). The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups.
33. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89(4), 234-245.
34. Perry, N. E., & Winne, P. H. (2006). Learning from learning kits: Study traces of students' self-regulated engagements with computerized content. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 211-228.
35. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-408.
36. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
37. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
38. Rachal, K. C., Daigle, S., & Rachal, W. S. (2007). Learning problems reported by college students: are they using learning strategies? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(4), 191-200.
39. Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 347-358.
40. Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2007). Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 351-378.
41. Schmeck, R., Geisler-Brenstein, E., & Cercy, S. P. (1991). Self-concept and learning: The revised inventory of learning processes. Educational Psychology, 11, 343-362.
42. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
43. Sins, P., van Joolingen, W., Savelsbergh, E., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modelling task: Relations between students' achievement, goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 58-77.
44. Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
45. Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
46. Thomas, G. P., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students' metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: the SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1701-1724.
47. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1992). Cognitieve strategieën als onderwijsdoel. [Cognitive Strategies as Educational Goal.]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
48. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2000). Assessing self-directed learning. In P. R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 83-101). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). Leerstrategieën meten. Soorten meetmethoden en hun bruikbaarheid in onderwijs en onderzoek. [Measuring Learning strategies. Different kinds of assessment methods and their usefulness in education and research]. Pedagogische Studiën, 86, 110-103.
50. van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., Simons, P. R. J., & Volet, S. (2000). Active learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. In P. R. J. Simons, J. L. van der Linden, & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 21-37). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
51. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multimethod designs? In C. Artelt & B. Moschner (Eds.), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75-97). Berlin: Waxmann.
52. Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Verheij, J. (2003). Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 357-372.
53. Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-15.
54. Verheul, I., & Yang, J. (1986). Het traceren van leerprocessen via hardop-leermethode en een procesvragenlijst. [Tracing learning processes by means of the thinking-aloud method and a process questionnaire.]. In W. J. van den Linden & J. M. Wijnstra (Eds.), Ontwikkelingen in de methodologie van het onderwijsonderzoek. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
55. Vermunt, J. D. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturing van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs [Learning styles and regulation of learning processes in higher education]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
56. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
57. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-567). Orlando: Academic.
58. Weinstein, C. E., & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. Washington: American Psychological Association.
59. Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (2002). LASSI user's manual: For those administering the learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater: H& H Pub.
60. Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hilsdale: Erlbaum.