Fractal analysis in a systems biology approach to cancer

Seminars in Cancer Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 175-182

  Bizzarri, M ^a   Giuliani, A ^b   Cucina, A ^a   D'Anselmi, F ^a   Soto, A M ^c   Sonnenschein, C ^c  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Carcinogenesis; Complexity; Fractal analysis; Non linear dynamics; System biology

Indexed keywords

BETA CATENIN; PROTEOME; UVOMORULIN;

BREAST CANCER; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL METABOLISM; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CYTOSKELETON; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; GENOME; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; METABOLOME; MOUTH CARCINOMA; NEOPLASM; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

FRACTALS; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 79960702246     PISSN: 1044579X     EISSN: 10963650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Hornberg J.J., Bruggeman F.J., Westerhoff H.V., Lankelma J. Cancer: a systems biology disease. Biosystems 2006, 83:81-90.
2. Khalil I.G., Hill C. Systems biology for cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2005, 17:44-48.
3. Conti F., Valerio M.C., Zbilut J.P., Giuliani A. Will systems biology offer new holistic paradigms to life sciences?. Syst Synth Biol 2007, 1:161-165.
4. Van Regenmortel M.H.V. Biological complexity emerges from the ashes of genetic reductionism. J Mol Recognit 2004, 17:145-148.
5. Heng H.H.Q. The conflict between complex systems and reductionism. JAMA 2008, 300(13):1580-1581.
6. Corbellini G., Preti C. The evolution of the biomedical paradigm in oncology: implications for cancer tehrapy. Targeted therapies in cancer 2008, 5-18. Springer, Basel. F. Colotta, A. Mantovani (Eds.).
7. A rather negative judgment about the methodological foundations of cancer research was made by Robert Weinberg, who expressed the view that experimental oncologists cultivate the illusion of doing " something meaningful" just because they can manage straightforward experiments to accumulate a huge amount of reproducible data" quoted in Leaft C. Why we're losing the war on cancer (and how to win it). Fortune, 2004; 149(6): 76-88.
8. Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002, 295:1662-1664.
9. Laughlin R.B., Pines D., Schmalian J., Stojkovic B.P., Wolynes P. The middle way. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:32-37.
10. Laughlin R.B., Pines D. The theory of everything. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:28-31.
11. Strohman R. Organization becomes cause in the matter. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:575-576.
12. Hood L., Gala D. The digital code of DNA. Nature 2003, 421:444-448.
13. Westerhoff H.V., Palsson B.O. The evolution of molecular biology into systems biology. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:1249-1252.
14. Moss L. The question of questions: what is a gene? Comments on Rolston and Griffiths & Stotz. Theor Med Bioeth 2006, 27(6):523-534.
15. Noble D. Claude Bernard, the first systems biologist, and the future of physiology. Exp Physiol 2008, 93:16-26.
16. Huang S. Redefining priorities in gene-based drug discovery. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:471-472.
17. Barcellos-Hoff M.H. It takes a tissue to make a tumour: epigenetics, cancer and the microenvironment. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2001, 6(2):213-221.
18. Nicolis G., Prigogine I. Exploring complexity 1989, W.H. Freeman, NY.
19. Shannon E.C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948, 27:379-423.
20. Miklos Rubin H. The role of the genome project in determining the gene function: insights from model organisms. Cell 1996, 86:521-529.
21. Stent G. Strength and weakness of the genetic approach to the development of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 1981, 4:163-194.
22. Ricard J. Binding energy and the information content of some elementary biological processes. C R Acad Sci Paris 2001, 324:297-304.
23. Shearin A.L., Ostrander E.A. Canine morphology: hunting for genes and tracking mutations. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:1-6.
24. Van de Vijver G., Van Speybroeck L., Vandevyvere W. Reflecting on complexity of biological systems: Kant and beyond?. Acta Biotheor 2003, 51(2):101-140.
25. Ricard J., Bernardi G. Emergent collective properties, networks and information biology 2006, Elsevier Science, London.
26. Albert R., Jeong H., Barabasi A.L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 2000, 406:378-381.
27. Adami C. What is complexity?. BioEssays 2002, 24:1085-1094.
28. Longo G., Bailly F. Biological organization and negative entropy. J Biol Syst 2009, 17:63-96.
29. Chaitin G.I. Information-theoretic computational complexity. IEEE Trans Inform Theory IT-20 1974, 10-15.
30. Spillman W.B., Robertson J.L., Huckle W.R., Govindan B.S., Meissner K.E. Complexity, fractals, disease time, and cancer. Phys Rev E 2004, 70:1-12.
31. Guo Y., Eichler G.S., Feng Y., Ingber D.E., Huang S. Towards a holistic, yet gene-centered analysis of gene expression profiles: a case study of human lung cancers. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006, 2006:1-11.
32. Prigogine I., Nicolis G. Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems 1977, Wiley, NY.
33. Kauffman S.A. Origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution 1993, Oxford University Press, New York.
34. Chang H.H., Hemberg M., Barahona M., Ingber D.E., Huang S. Transcriptome wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 2008, 453:544-547.
35. Albert R., Othmer H.G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J Theor Biol 2003, 223:1-18.
36. Li F., Long T., Lu Y., Ouyang Q., Tang C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101:4781-4786.
37. Huang S. Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery. J Mol Med 1999, 77:469-480.
38. Aldana-Gonzalez M., Coppersmith S., Kadanoff L.P. Boolean dynamics with random couplings. Perspectives and problems in non-linear science 2003, 23-89. Springer, NY. E. Kaplan, J.E. Marsden, K.R. Sreenivasan (Eds.).
39. De Haan J. How emergence arises. Ecol Compl 2006, 3:293-301.
40. Soto A.M., Sonnenschein C., Miquel P.A. On physicalism and downward causation in developmental and cancer biology. Acta Biotheor 2008, 56(4):257-274.
41. Denton M., Marshall C. Laws of form revisited. Nature 2001, 410:417.
42. Virchow R.L.K. Cellular Pathology. 1859 1978, John Churchill, London, UK, pp. 204-207. Special ed.
43. Rosai J. The continuing role of morphology in the molecular age. Mod Pathol 2001, 14:258-260.
44. Hammond T.G., Lewis F.C., Goodwin T.J., Linnehan R.M., Wolf D.A., Hire K.P., et al. Gene expression in space. Nat Med 1999, 5:359.
45. Stein G.S., Van Wijnen A.J., Stein J.L., Lian J.B., Pockwinse S.H., McNeil S. Implications for interrelationships between nuclear architecture and control of gene expression under microgravity conditions. FASEB J 1999, 13:S157-S166.
46. Pourati J., Maniotis A., Speigel D., Schaffer J.L., Butler J.P., Fredberg J.J., et al. Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells?. Am J Physiol 1998, 274:C1283-C1289.
47. Wang N., Tytell J.D., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(1):75-82.
48. Chen C.S., Mrksich M., Huang S., Withesides G.M., Ingber D.E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276:1425-1428.
49. Mandelbrott B.B. The fractal geometry of the Nature 1982, W.H. Freeman, New York.
50. Rangayyan R.M., Nguyen T.M. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms. J Digit Imaging 2007, 20(3):223-237.
51. Rangayyan R.M., El-Faramawy N.M., Desautels J.E.L., Alim O.A. Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumours. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997, 16(6):799-810.
52. Fractals in biology and medicine 2002, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel. G.A. Losa, D. Merlini, T.F. Nonnenmacher, E.R. Weibel (Eds.).
53. Baish J.W., Jain R.K. Fractals and cancer. Cancer Res 2000, 60:3683-3688.
54. Cross S.S. Fractals in pathology. J Pathol 1997, 182:1-8.
55. Cross S.S., McDonagh A.J.G., Stephenson T.J., et al. Fractal and integer-dimensional analysis of pigmented skin lesions. Am J Dermatol 1995, 17:374-378.
56. Claridge E., Hall P.N., Keefe M., et al. Shape analysis for classification of malignant melanoma. J Biomed Eng 1992, 14:229-324.
57. Gazit Y., Berk D.A., Leunig M., Baxter L.T., Jain R.K. Scale-invariant behavior and vascular network formation in normal and tumour tissue. Phys Rev Lett 1995, 75:2428-2431.
58. Michaelson J.S., Cheongsiatmoy J.A., Dewey F., et al. Spread of human cancer cells occurs with probabilities indicative of a nongenetic mechanism. Br J Cancer 2005, 93:1244-1249.
59. Tracqui P. Biophysical model of tumor growth. Rep Prog Phys 2009, 72:1-30.
60. Landini G., Rippin J.W. How important is tumour shape? Quantification of the epithelial connective tissue interface in oral lesions using local connected fractal dimension analysis. J Pathol 1996, 179:210-217.
61. Eid R.A., Landini G. Quantification of the global and local complexity of the epithelial-connective tissue interface of normal, dysplastic, and neoplastic oral mucose using digital imaging. Pathol Res Pract 2003, 199:475-482.
62. Waliszewski P., Konarski J. Fractal structure of space and time is necessary for the emergence of self-organization, connectivity and collectivity in cellular system. Fractals in biology and medicine 2002, 15-24. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel. G.A. Losa, D. Merlini, T.F. Nonnenmacher, E.R. Weibel (Eds.).
63. Folkman J., Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978, 273:345-349.
64. Ingber D.E. How cells (might) sense microgravity. FASEB J 1999, 13:S3-S15.
65. Sonnenschein C., Soto A.M. Theories of carcinogenesis: an emerging perspective. Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18:372-377.
66. Ingber D.E. Mechanical control of tissue growth: function follows form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(33):11571-11572.
67. Mandelbrot B.B. Stochastic models for the Earth's relief, the shape and the fractal dimension of the coastlines, and the number-area rule for islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1975, 72:3825-3828.
68. Smith T.G., Lange G.D., Marks W.B. Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology - dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals. J Neurosci Methods 1996, 69:123-136.
69. Cutting J.E., Garvin J.J. Fractal curves and complexity. Percept Psychophys 1987, 42:365-370.
70. Scheck F. Mechanics 1990, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
71. Toussaint O., Schneider E.D. The thermodynamics and evolution of complexity in biological systems. Comp Biochem Physiol 1998, 120:3-9.
72. Maffini M.V., Calabro J.M., Soto A.M., Sonnenschein C. Stromal regulation of neoplastic development: age-dependent normalization of neoplastic mammary cells by mammary stroma. Am J Pathol 2005, 167(5):1405-1410.
73. McKinnell R.G. Nuclear transfer in Xenopus and Rana compared. Cell differentiation 1972, 61-64. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. R. Harris, P. Allin, D. Viza (Eds.).
74. Pierce G.B. The cancer cell and its control by the embryo. Am J Pathol 1983, 113:116-124.
75. Hendrix M.J.C., Seftor E.A., Seftor R.E.B., Kasemeier-Kulesa J., Kulesa P.M. Postovit L-M reprogramming metastatic tumour cells with embryonic microenvironments. Nat Rev Cancer 2007, 7:246-255.
76. D'Anselmi F., Valerio M., Cucina A., Galli L., Proietti S., Dinicola S., et al. Metabolism and cell shape in cancer: a fractal analysis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010 May 10, [Epub ahead of print].
77. Bowie J.E., Young I.T. An analysis technique for biological shape. Acta Cytol 1977, 21:739-746.
78. Cesar R.M., Costa L., da F. The application and assessment of multiscale bending energy for morphometric characterization of neural cells. Rev Sci Instrum 1997, 68:2177-2186.
79. Castleman K.R. Digital image processing 1996, Prentice-Hall, Engelewood Cliffs, NY.
80. Foty R., Forgacs G., Pfleger C., Steimberg M. Liquid properties of embryonic tissues: measurement of interfacial tensions. Phys Rev Lett 1994, 72:2298-2301.
81. Foty R., Pfleger C., Forcas G., Steimberg M. Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behaviour. Development (Camb.) 1996, 122:1611-1620.
82. Rohrschneider M., Scheuermann G., Hoehme S., Drasdo D. Shape characterization of extracted and simulated tumor samples using topological and geometric measures. Engineering in medicine and biology society. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS 2007, SuA04.5: pp. 6271-6277.
83. Trosko J.E., Chang C.-C., Upham B.L., Tai M.-H. Ignored hallmarks of carcinogenesis: stem cells and cell-cell communication. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004, 1028:192-201.
84. Cristini V., Frieboes H.B., Gatenby R., Caserta S., Ferrari M., Sinek J. Morphologic instability and cancer invasion. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11(19):6772-6779.
85. Ferriera S.C., Martins M.L., Villa M.J. Morphology transitions induced by chemotherapy in carcinomas in situ. Phys Rev E 2003, 67:1-9.
86. Phillips B.T., Kimble J. A new look at TCF and beta-catenin through the lens of a divergent C. elegans Wnt pathway. Dev Cell 2009, 17(1):27-34.
87. da Silva E.C., Silva A.C., de Paiva A.C., Nunes R.A. Diagnosis of lung nodule using Moran's index and Geary's coefficient in computerized tomography images. Pattern Anal Appl 2008, 11:89-99.
88. Prigogine I., Wiame J.M. Biologie et thermodynamique des phenomenes irreversibles. Experientia 1946, 2:451-453.
89. Zotin A.A., Zotin A.I. Phenomenological theory of ontogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 1997, 41:917-921.
90. Soto A.M., Sonnenschein C. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization. J Biosci 2005, 30(1):103-118.
91. Huang S., Ingber D.E. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. Exp Cell Res 2000, 261:91-103.
92. Lelièvre S.A., Weaver V.M., Nickerson J.A., Larabell C.A., Bhaumik A., Petersen O.W., et al. Tissue phenotype depends on reciprocal interactions between the extracellular matrix and the structural organization of the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:14711-14716.
93. Thomas C.H., Collier J.H., Sfeir C.S., Healy K.E. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:1972-1977.
94. Paszek M.J., Zahir N., Johnson K.R., Lakins J.N., Rozenberg G.I., Gefen A., et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 2005, 8:241-254.
95. Huang S., Ernberg I., Kauffman S. Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumours from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20(7):869-876.
96. Gilbert S.F., Opitz J.M., Raff R.A. Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Dev Biol 1996, 173:357-372.