Control of cryptic transcription in eukaryotes

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 702, Issue , 2010, Pages 122-131

  Rougemaille, Mathieu ^a,b   Libri, Domenico ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR RNA; RNA POLYMERASE II; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNTRANSLATED RNA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; EUKARYOTE; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA DEGRADATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL NUCLEUS; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME; HUMANS; RNA; RNA POLYMERASE II; RNA STABILITY; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; RNA, UNTRANSLATED; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 79960690465     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7841-7_10     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Kapranov P, Cawley SE, Drenkow J, et al. Large-scale transcriptional activity in chromosomes 21 and 22. Science 2002; 296:916-919. (Pubitemid 34464898)
2. Wyers F, Rougemaille M, Badis G, et al. Cryptic pol II transcripts are degraded by a nuclear quality control pathway involving a new poly(A) polymerase. Cell 2005; 121:725-737. (Pubitemid 40797595)
3. Davis CA, Ares M Jr. Accumulation of unstable promoter-associated transcripts upon loss of the nuclear exosome subunit Rrp6p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:3262-3267. (Pubitemid 43346458)
4. Core LJ, Waterfall JJ, Lis JT. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 2008; 322:1845-1848.
5. He Y, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, et al. The antisense transcriptomes of human cells. Science 2008; 322:1855-1857.
6. Preker P, Nielsen J, Kammler S, et al. RNA exosome depletion reveals transcription upstream of active human promoters. Science 2008; 322:1851-1854.
7. Seila AC, Calabrese JM, Levine SS, et al. Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science 2008; 322:1849-1851.
8. Neil H, Malabat C, dAubenton-Carafa Y, et al. Widespread bidirectional promoters are the major source of cryptic transcripts in yeast. Nature 2009; 457:1038-1042.
9. Xu Z, Wei W, Gagneur J, et al. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast. Nature 2009; 457:1033-1037.
10. Hollams EM, Giles KM, Thomson AM, et al. mRNA stability and the control of gene expression: implications for human disease. Neurochem Res 2002; 27:957-980. (Pubitemid 35316096)
11. Audic Y, Hartley RS. Post-transcriptional regulation in cancer. Biol Cell 2004; 96:479-498.
12. Moore MJ. Nuclear RNA turnover. Cell 2002; 108:431-434. (Pubitemid 34260868)
13. Schmitt M, Jensen TH. The exosome: a multipurpose RNA-decay machine. Trens Biochem Sci 2008; 33:501-510.
14. Lebreton A, Séraphin B. Exosome-mediated quality control: substrate recruitment and molecular activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1179:558-565.
15. Allmang C, Petfalski E, Podtelejnikov A, et al. The yeast exosome and human PM-Scl are related complexes of 3′ → 5′ exonucleases. Genes Dev 1999; 13:2148-2158. (Pubitemid 29407354)
16. Liu Q, Greimann JC, Lima CD. Reconstitution, activities and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 2006; 127:1223-1237. (Pubitemid 44894519)
17. Dziembowski A, Lorentzen E, Conti E, et al. A single subunit, Dis3, is essentially responsible for yeast exosome core activity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:15-22. (Pubitemid 46067418)
18. Bonneau F, Basquin J, Ebert J, et al. The yeast exosome functions as a macromolecular cage to channel RNA substrates for degradation. Cell 2009; 139:547-559.
19. Mitchell P, Tollervey D. Musing on the structural organization of the exosome complex. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7:843-846.
20. Burkard KT, Butler JS. A nuclear 3′-5′ exonuclease involved in mRNA degradation interacts with Poly(A) polymerase and the hnRNA protein Npl3p. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:604-616. (Pubitemid 30023102)
21. Lebreton A, Séraphin B. Endonucleolytic RNA cleavage by a eukaryotic exosome. 2008; 456:993-996.
22. Schaeffer D, Tsanova B, Barbas A, et al. The exosome contains domains with specic endoribonuclease, exoribonuclease and cytoplasmic mRNA decay activities. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008; 16:56-62.
23. Schneider C, Leung E, Brown J, et al. The N-terminal PIN domain of the exosome subunit Rrp44 harbors endonuclease activity and tethers Rrp44 to the yeast core exosome. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:1127-1140.
24. LaCava J, Houseley J, Saveanu C, et al. RNA degradation by the exosome is promoted by a nuclear polyadenylation complex. Cell 2005; 121:713-724. (Pubitemid 40797594)
25. Vanacova S, Wolf J, Martin G, et al. A new yeast poly(A) polymerase complex involved in RNA quality control. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:e189.
26. Carpousis AJ, Vanzo NF, Raynal LC. mRNA degradation. A tale of poly(A) and multiprotein machines. Trends Genet 1999; 15:24-28. (Pubitemid 29207341)
27. Kadaba S, Krueger A, Trice T, et al. Nuclear surveillance and degradation of hypomodied initiator tRNAMet in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev 2004; 18:1227-1240. (Pubitemid 38720591)
28. Kadaba S, Wang X, Anderson J. Nuclear RNA surveillance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Trf4p-dependent polyadenylation of nascent hypomethylated tRNA and an aberrant form of 5S rRNA. RNA 2006; 12:508-521. (Pubitemid 43290877)
29. Rougemaille M, Gudipati RK, Olesen JR, et al. Dissecting mechanisms of nuclear mRNA surveillance in THO/sub2 complex mutants. Embo J 2007; 26:2317-2326. (Pubitemid 46685852)
30. Houalla R, Devaux F, Fatica A, et al. Microarray detection of novel nuclear RNA substrates for the exosome. Yeast 2006; 23:439-454. (Pubitemid 43797108)
31. Arigo JT, Eyler DE, Carroll KL, et al. Termination of cryptic unstable transcripts is directed by yeast RNA-binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3. Mol Cell 2006; 23:841-851. (Pubitemid 44344519)
32. Thiebaut M, Colin J, Neil H, et al. Futile cycle of transcription initiation and termination modulates the response to nucleotide shortage in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2008; 31:671-682.
33. Johnson JM, Edwards S, Shoemaker D, et al. Dark matter in the genome: evidence of widespread transcription detected by microarray tiling experiments. Trends Genet 2005; 21:93-102. (Pubitemid 40127353)
34. Taft RJ, Glazov EA, Cloonan N, Simons C, et al. Tiny RNAs associated with transcription start sites in animals. Nat Genet 2009; 41:572-578.
35. Kapranov P, Cheng J, Dike S, et al. RNA maps reveal new RNA classes and a possible function for pervasive transcription. Science 2007; 316:1484-1488. (Pubitemid 46906616)
36. Thiebaut M, Kisseleva-Romanova E, Rougemaille M, et al. Transcription termination and nuclear degradation of cryptic unstable transcripts: a role for the nrd1-nab3 pathway in genome surveillance. Mol Cell 2006; 23:853-864. (Pubitemid 44344521)
37. Steinmetz EJ, Conrad NK, Brow DA, et al. RNA-binding protein Nrd1 directs poly(A)-independent 3′-end formation of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Nature 2001; 413:327-331. (Pubitemid 32905855)
38. Carroll KL, Pradhan DA, Granek JA, et al. Identication of cis elements directing termination of yeast nonpolyadenylated snoRNA transcripts. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:6241-6252. (Pubitemid 38891126)
39. Yuryev A, Patturajan M, Litingtung Y, et al. The C-terminal domain of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II interacts with a novel set of serine/arginine-rich proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:6975-6980. (Pubitemid 26243485)
40. Vasiljeva L, Kim M, Mutschler H, et al. The Nrd1-Nab3-Sen1 termination complex interacts with the Ser5-phosphorylated RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008; 15:795-804.
41. Vasiljeva L, Buratowski S. Nrd1 interacts with the nuclear exosome for 3′processing of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Mol Cell 2006; 21:239-248. (Pubitemid 43099939)
42. Kaplan CD, Laprade L, Winston F. Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 2003; 301:1096-1099. (Pubitemid 37022311)
43. Mason PB, Struhl K. The FACT complex travels with elongating RNA polymerase II and is important for the ldelity of transcriptional initiation in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:8323-8333. (Pubitemid 37377521)
44. Gudipati RK, Villa T, Boulay, et al. Phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain dictates transcription termination choice. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2008; 15:786-794.
45. Buratowski S. The CTD code. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10:679-680. (Pubitemid 37052403)
46. Gemmill TR, Wu X, Hanes SD. Vanishingly low levels of Ess1 prolyl-isomerase activity are suffcient for growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:15510-15517. (Pubitemid 40616666)
47. Krishnamurthy S, Ghazy MA, Moore C, et al. Functional interaction of the Ess1 prolyl isomerase with components of the RNA polymerase II initiation and termination machineries. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:2925-2934.
48. Singh N, Ma Z, Gemmill T, et al. The Ess1 prolyl isomerase is required for transcription termination of small noncoding RNAs via the Nrd1 pathway. Mol Cell 2009; 36:255-266.
49. Martens JA, Laprade L, Winston F. Intergenic transcription is required to repress the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SER3 gene. Nature 2004; 429:571-574. (Pubitemid 38737662)
50. Martens JA, Wu PY, Winston F. Regulation of an intergenic transcript controls adjacent gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 2005; 19:2695-2704. (Pubitemid 41627936)
51. Jenks MH, ORourke TW, Reines D. Properties of an intergenic terminator and start site switch that regulate IMD2 transcription in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:3883-3893. (Pubitemid 351812976)
52. Kuehner JN, Brow DA. Regulation of a eukaryotic gene by GTP-dependent start site selection and transcription attenuation. Mol Cell 2008; 31:201-211. (Pubitemid 352001395)
53. Hongay CF, Grisà PL, Galitski T, et al. Antisense transcription controls cell fate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 2006; 127:735-745. (Pubitemid 44716254)
54. Camblong J, Iglesias N, Fickentscher C, et al. Antisense RNA stabilization induces transcriptional gene silencing via histone deacetylation in S. cerevisiae. Cell 2007; 131:706-717. (Pubitemid 350087198)
55. Gribnau J, Diderich K, Pruzina S, et al. Intergenic transcription and developmental remodeling of chromatin subdomains in the human beta-globin locus. Mol Cell 2000; 5:377-386. (Pubitemid 30628094)
56. Bolland DJ, Wood AL, Johnston CM, et al. Antisense intergenic transcription in V(D) J recombination. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:630-637.
57. Schmitt S, Prestel M, Paro R. Intergenic transcription through a polycomb group response element counteracts silencing. Genes Dev 2005; 19:697-708. (Pubitemid 40395081)
58. Wang X, Arai S, Song X, et al. Induced ncRNAs allosterically modify RNA-binding proteins in cis to inhibit transcription. Nature 2008; 454:126-130. (Pubitemid 351934270)