Visual cognition

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1538-1551

  Cavanagh, Patrick ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognition; Motion; Object recognition; Vision

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BRIGHTNESS; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPATIAL ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL COGNITION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960641369     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.015     Document Type: Review

References (187)

1. Al-Haytham, I., (1024/1989). The optics of Ibn Al-Haytham books I-III. Translated by A. I. Sabra. London: The Warburg Institute.
2. Allik J., Tuulmets T. Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 49:303-314.
3. Alvarez G.A., Cavanagh P. Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual fields. Psychological Science 2005, 16:637-643.
4. Alvarez G.A., Franconeri S.L. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(13). 14.1-14.10.
5. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 2004, 111:1036-1060.
6. Anderson J.R., Fincham J.M., Qin Y., Stocco A. A central circuit of the mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:136-143.
7. Anstis S. The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 1980, 290:153-168.
8. Anstis S., Ramachandran V.S. Visual inertia in apparent motion. Vision Research 1987, 27:755-764.
9. Awh E., Armstrong K.M., Moore T. Visual and oculomotor selection: Links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:124-130.
10. Awh E., Vogel E.K., Oh S.H. Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience 2006, 139:201-208.
11. Baars B.J. A cognitive theory of consciousness 1988, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Baars B.J. The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:47-52.
13. Bahcall D.O., Kowler E. Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research 1999, 39:71-86.
14. Bahrami B. Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition 2003, 10:949-963.
15. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Pook P.K., Rao R.P. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1997, 20:723-742. (discussion 743-767).
16. Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:617-629.
17. Barenholtz E., Cohen E.H., Feldman J., Singh M. Detection of change in shape: An advantage for concavities. Cognition 2003, 89:1-9.
18. Barrow H.G., Tenenbaum J.M. Interpreting line drawings as three-dimensional surfaces. Artificial Intelligence 1981, 17:75-116.
19. Bartlett S.F. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology 1932, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
20. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94:115-147.
21. Blakemore S.-J., Decety J. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 2:561-567.
22. Braddick O. A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research 1974, 14:519-527.
23. Braddick O.J. Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 1980, 290:137-151.
24. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S.Y., Tarr M.J. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?. Cerebral Cortex 1995, 5:247-260.
25. Carlson T.A., Alvarez G.A., Cavanagh P. Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2007, 104:13496-13500.
26. Carrasco M. Visual attention. Vision Research 2011, 51:1484-1525.
27. Cavanagh P. What's up in top-down processing?. Representations of vision: Trends and tacit assumptions in vision research 1991, 295-304. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. A. Gorea (Ed.).
28. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science 1992, 257:1563-1565.
29. Cavanagh P. Attention routines and the architecture of selection. Cognitive neuroscience of attention 2004, 13-28. Guilford Press, New York. M. Posner (Ed.).
30. Cavanagh P. The artist as neuroscientist. Nature 2005, 434:301-307.
31. Cavanagh P., Alvarez G. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:349-354.
32. Cavanagh P., Hunt A., Afraz A., Rolfs M. Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:147-153.
33. Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T., Thornton I.M. Attention-based visual routines: Sprites. Cognition 2001, 80:47-60.
34. Chatterjee S.H., Freyd J.J., Shiffrar M. Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1996, 22:916-929.
35. Clark A. Feature-placing and proto-objects. Philosophical Psychology 2004, 17:443-469.
36. Cutzu F., Tsotsos J.K. The selective tuning model of attention: Psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item. Vision Research 2003, 43(2):205-219.
37. Deco G., Rolls E.T. Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: A unifying theory. Progress in Neurobiology 2005, 76:236-256.
38. Dehaene S. Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 1992, 44:1-42.
39. Dehaene S. The number sense 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Dehaene S., Naccache L. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 2001, 79:1-37.
41. Delvenne J.F. The capacity of visual short-term memory within and between hemifields. Cognition 2005, 96:B79-B88.
42. Elder J.H. Are edges incomplete?. International Journal of Computer Vision 1999, 34(2/3):97-122.
43. Enns J.T. The thinking eye, the seeing brain 2004, WW Norton, NY.
44. Falmier O., Young M.E. The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality. American Journal of Psychology 2008, 121:473-500.
45. Farzin, F., Rivera, S. M., & Whitney, D. (2010). Spatial resolution of conscious visual perception in infants. Psychological Science (Epub ahead of print).
46. Feldman J. What is a visual object?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:252-256.
47. Fodor J. The mind doesn't work that way 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge.
48. Franconeri S.L., Bemis D.K., Alvarez G.A. Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects. Cognition 2009, 113:1-13.
49. Freeman W.T. The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature 1994, 368:542-545.
50. Freiwald W.A., Tsao D.Y., Livingstone M.S. A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12:1187-1196.
51. Fukushima K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics 1980, 36:193-202.
52. Funahashi S. Prefrontal cortex and working memory processes. Neuroscience 2006, 139:251-261.
53. Geisler W.S. Contributions of ideal observer theory to vision research. Vision Research 2011, 51:771-781.
54. Gilchrist A., Kossyfidis C., Bonato F., Agostini T., Cataliotti J., Li X., et al. An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review 1999, 106:795-834.
55. Gregory R.L. Cognitive contours. Nature 1972, 238:51-52.
56. Gregory R.L. Seeing through illusions 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
57. Grossberg S. A solution of the figure-ground problem in biological vision. Neural Networks 1993, 6:463-483.
58. Grossberg S. Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure-ground perception of two-dimensional pictures. Psychological Review 1997, 104:618-658.
59. Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review 1985, 92:173-211.
60. Halberda J., Sires S., Feigenson L. Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated in parallel. Psychological Science 2006, 17:572-576.
61. He S., Cavanagh P., Intriligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of awareness. Nature 1996, 383:334-338.
62. He Z.J., Nakayama K. Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature 1992, 359:231-233.
63. Heider F., Simmel M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 1944, 57:243-249.
64. Helmholtz, H. von (1867/1962). Treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3), New York: Dover, 1962; English translation by J P C Southall for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (first published in 1867, Leipzig: Voss).
65. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:243-271.
66. Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 2002, 36:791-804.
67. Hoffman D.D. Visual intelligence: How we create what we see 1998, Norton, NY.
68. Holcombe A.O. Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009, 13:216-221.
69. Howard I.P. Alhazen's neglected discoveries of visual phenomena. Perception 1996, 25:1203-1217.
70. Intriligator J., Cavanagh P. The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 43:171-216.
71. Itti L., Koch C. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2:194-203.
72. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
73. Jolicoeur P., Ullman S., Mackay M. Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:129-140.
74. Jolicoeur P., Ullman S., Mackay M. Visual curve tracing properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:997-1022.
75. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs D.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
76. Kellman P.J., Shipley T.E. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology 1991, 23:141-221.
77. Kersten D., Knill D.C., Mamassian P., Bülthoff I. Illusory motion from shadows. Nature 1996, 4:31.
78. Kingdom F.A. Lightness, brightness and transparency: A quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy. Vision Research 2011, 51:652-673.
79. Kosslyn S.M. You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1519-1523.
80. Kosslyn S.M., Flynn R.A., Amsterdam J.B., Wang G. Components of high-level vision: A cognitive neuroscience analysis and accounts of neurological syndromes. Cognition 1990, 34:203-277.
81. Lavie N. Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Science 2005, 9:75-82.
82. Lee D.K., Koch C., Braun J. Spatial vision thresholds in the near absence of attention. Vision Research 1997, 37:2409-2418.
83. Leo I., Simion F. Newborns' Mooney-face perception. Infancy 2009, 14:641-653.
84. Lepsien J., Nobre A.C. Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: Insights from orienting attention to mental representations. Brain Research 2006, 1105:20-31.
85. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. Selection for cognition: Cognitive constraints on visual spatial attention. Visual Cognition 1999, 6:55-81.
86. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Bülthoff H.H., Poggio T. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology 1994, 4:401-414.
87. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. Three systems for visual motion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1996, 5:44-53.
88. Malik J. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1987, 1:73-107.
89. Mamassian P., Knill D.C., Kersten D. The perception of cast shadows. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2:288-295.
90. Marr D. Vision 1982, W H Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
91. Maunsell J.H.R., Treue S. Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 2006, 29:317-322.
92. McAfoose J., Baune B.T. Exploring visual-spatial working memory: A critical review of concepts and models. Neuropsychological Review 2009, 19:130-412.
93. Melcher D., Papathomas T.V., Vidnyánszky Z. Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features. Neuron 2005, 46:723-729.
94. Melcher D., Vidnyánszky Z. Subthreshold features of visual objects: Unseen but not unbound. Vision Research 2006, 46:1863-1867.
95. Michotte, A. (1946/1963). La perception de la causalité. (Louvain: Institut Supérior de Philosophie,1946) [English translation of updated edition by T. Miles, E. Miles The Perception of Causality, Basic Books, 1963].
96. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
97. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. The psychology of computer vision 1975, 211-280. McGraw-Hill, New York. P.H. Winston (Ed.).
98. Mitroff S.R., Scholl B.J., Wynn K. The relationship between object files and conscious perception. Cognition 2005, 96:67-92.
99. Moore T., Armstrong K.M., Fallah M. Visuomotor origins of covert spatial attention. Neuron 2003, 40:671-683.
100. Moore C.M., Yantis S., Vaughan B. Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science 1998, 9:104-110.
101. Morgan M.J. Features and the 'primal sketch'. Vision Research 2011, 51:738-753.
102. Mounts J.R. Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62:969-983.
103. Muller J.R., Philiastides M.G., Newsome W.T. Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2005, 102:524-529.
104. Mumford D. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biological Cybernetics 1992, 66:241-251.
105. Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. Kosslyn, D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Frontiers in Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd ed., pp.1-70 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106. Nakayama K., Martini P. Situating visual search. Vision Research 2011, 51:1526-1537.
107. Nakayama K., Shimojo S. Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 1992, 257:1357-1363.
108. Nakayama K., Shimojo S., Silverman G.H. Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 1989, 18:55-68.
109. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology 1967, Prentice Hall, New York.
110. Neri P., Morrone M.C., Burr D.C. Seeing biological motion. Nature 1998, 395:894-896.
111. Newell A. You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. Visual information processing 1973, 283-308. Academic Press, New York. W.G. Chase (Ed.).
112. Newell A. Unified theories of cognition 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
113. Oksama L., Hyöna J. Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher-order cognition? An individual difference approach. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:631-671.
114. Oliva A., Torralba A. Building the gist of a scene: The role of lobal image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 155:23-36.
115. O'Regan J.K. Solving the 'real' mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1992, 46:461-488.
116. Ostrovsky Y., Cavanagh P., Sinha P. Perceiving illumination inconsistencies in scenes. Perception 2005, 34:1301-1314.
117. Palmer S. Vision science: Photons to phenomenology 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
118. Palmeri T.J., Gauthier I. Visual object understanding. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:1-13.
119. Pashler H. The psychology of attention 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
120. Pentland, A. (1987). Recognition by parts. In Proc. First Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, London, UK (pp. 612-620).
121. Pinker S. Visual cognition: An introduction. Cognition 1984, 18:1-63.
122. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 1990, 343:263-266.
123. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
124. Pylyshyn Z.W. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition 1989, 32:65-97.
125. Pylyshyn Z.W. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brian Sciences 1999, 22:341-365.
126. Pylyshyn Z.W. Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition 2001, 80(1/2):127-158.
127. Pylyshyn Z.W. Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:801-822.
128. Pylyshyn Z.W. Seeing and Visualizing: It's not what you think 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
129. Pylyshyn Z.W. Things and places. How the mind connects with the world 2007, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
130. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R.W. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision 1988, 3:179-197.
131. Qiu F.T., Sugihara T., von der Heydt R. Figure-ground mechanisms provide structure for selective attention. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:1492-1499.
132. Qiu F.T., von der Heydt R. Figure and ground in the visual cortex: v2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules. Neuron 2005, 47:155-166.
133. Quiroga R.Q., Kreiman G., Koch C., Fried I. Sparse but not 'grandmother-cell' coding in the medial temporal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:87-91.
134. Rauschenberger R., Yantis S. Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search. Nature 2001, 410:369-372.
135. Rensink R.A. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:17-42.
136. Rensink R.A., Cavanagh P. The influence of cast shadows on visual search. Perception 2004, 33:1339-1358.
137. Richards W., Hoffman D.D. Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 1985, 31:265-281.
138. Rizzolatti G., et al. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:31-40.
139. Rock I. Perception 1984, W.H. Freeman, New York.
140. Rock I. The logic of perception 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
141. Rock I., DiVita J. A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:280-293.
142. Rock I., Palmer S. The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific American 1990, 263:84-90.
143. Roelfsema P.R., et al. Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature 1998, 395:376-381.
144. Roelfsema P.R. Elemental operations in vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:226-233.
145. Rosenfeld A. Picture processing by computer 1969, Academic Press, New York, NY.
146. Rossi A.F., Pessoa L., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. The prefrontal cortex and the executive control of attention. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:489-497.
147. Rutherford M.D., Pennington B.F., Rogers S.J. The perception of animacy in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2006, 36:983-992.
148. Sadja P., Finkel L.H. Intermediate-level visual representations and the construction of surface perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1995, 7:267-291.
149. Saenz M., Buracas G.T., Boynton G.M. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:631-632.
150. Saiki J. Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. Journal of Vision 2003, 3:6-21.
151. Sanocki T. Time course of object identification: Evidence for a global-to-local contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19(4):878-898.
152. Schank R., Abelson R. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding 1977, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
153. Schlottmann A., Ray E. Goal attribution to schematic animals: Do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate?. Developmental Science 2010, 13:1-10.
154. Scholl B.J. Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition 2001, 80:1-46.
155. Scholl B.J., Nakayama K. Causal capture: Contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science 2002, 13:493-498.
156. Scholl B.J., Pylyshyn Z.W., Feldman J. What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multi-element tracking. Cognition 2001, 80:159-177.
157. Scholl B.J., Tremoulet P.D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:299-309.
158. Selfridge, O. G. (1959) Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In D. V. Blake, A. M. Uttley. Proceedings of the symposium on the mechanisation of thought processes. Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
159. Shim W.M., Alvarez G.A., Jiang Y.V. Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:390-397.
160. Shimamura A.P. Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition. Consciousness and Cognition 2000, 9:313-323.
161. Sinha P., Poggio T. Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception. Nature 1996, 384:460-463.
162. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychological Review 2009, 116:283-317.
163. Spelke E.S. Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science 1990, 14:29-56.
164. Suzuki S., Cavanagh P. Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:901-913.
165. Thompson, P. & Burr, D. (2011). Motion perception. Vision Research.
166. Treisman A. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 1988, 40:201-237.
167. Treue S. Visual attention: The where, what, how and why of saliency. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003, 13(4):428-432.
168. Tsao D.Y., Livingstone M.S. Mechanisms of face perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2008, 31:411-437.
169. Tse P.U. Volume completion. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 39:37-68.
170. Tse P.U. Complete mergeability and amodal completion. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 1999, 102:165-201.
171. Turk M., Pentland A. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991, 3:71-86.
172. Ullman S. Visual routines. Cognition 1984, 18:97-159.
173. Ullman S. High-level vision 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
174. Ungerleider, L. G. (2011). Object and face perception and perceptual organization. Vision Research.
175. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of visual behavior 1982, 549-586. MIT Press. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
176. van der Velde F., de Kamps M. Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006, 29:37-108.
177. VanMarle K., Scholl B.J. Attentive tracking of objects versus substances. Psychological Science 2003, 14:498-504.
178. VanRullen R., Reddy L., Koch C. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:4-14.
179. Verstraten F.A.J., Cavanagh P., Labianca A.T. Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research 2000, 40:3651-3664.
180. Walther D., Koch C.B. Attention in hierarchical models of object recognition. Progress in Brain Research 2007, 165:57-78.
181. Winston P.H. The psychology of computer vision 1975, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
182. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:495-501.
183. Wolfe J.M., Klempen N., Dahlen K. Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:693-716.
184. Zacks J.M., Speer N.K., Swallow K.M., Braver T.S., Reynolds J.R. Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:273-293.
185. Zacks J.M., Tversky B. Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:3-21.
186. Zeki S. Localization and globalization in conscious vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2001, 24:57-86.
187. Zeki S., Bartels A. Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 1999, 8:225-259.