Detection of change in shape: An advantage for concavities

Cognition

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-9

  Barenholtz, Elan ^a   Cohen, Elias H ^a   Feldman, Jacob ^a   Singh, Manish ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Change detection; Concavity; Convexity; Part boundaries; Shape

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

SHAPE REPRESENTATION;

VISION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

EID: 0042168820     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00068-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review. 61:1954;183-193.
2. Ballard D.H., Hayhoe M.M., Pook P.K., Rao R.P.N. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 20:1997;723-767.
3. Barenholtz, E., & Feldman, J. (in press). Visual comparisons within and between object-parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect. Vision Research.
4. Bertamini M. The importance of being convex: an advantage for convexity when judging position. Perception. 30:(11):2001;1295-1310.
5. Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2003). Technical Report #73, Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University.
6. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science. 10:1999;438-443.
7. Hoffman D.D., Richards W.A. Parts of recognition. Cognition. 18:1984;65-96.
8. Hoffman D.D., Singh M. Salience of visual parts. Cognition. 63:1997;29-78.
9. Hullman J., te Winkel W., Boselie F. Concavities as basic features in visual search: evidence from search asymmetries. Perception & Psychophysics. 62:2000;162-174.
10. Keane S., Hayward W.G., Burke D. Detection of three types of changes to novel objects. Visual Cognition. 10:(1):2003;101-127.
11. Koenderink J.J. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception. 13:1984;321-330.
12. Marr D. Vision. 1982;Freeman Press, San Francisco, CA.
13. Palmer S.E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology. 9:1977;441-474.
14. Phillips W.A. On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics. 41:1974;191-201.
15. Phillips W.A., Singer W. Function and interaction of on and off transients in vision. I. Psychophysics. Experimental Brain Research. 19:1973;493-506.
16. Pomerantz J.R., Sager L.C., Stoever R.J. Perception of wholes and their component parts: some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 3:1977;422-435.
17. Rensink R.A., O'Regan K.A., Clark J.J. The need for attention to perceive changes to scenes. Psychological Science. 8:1997;368-373.
18. Resnikoff H.L. The illusion of reality: topics in information science. 1985;Springer-Verlag, New York.
19. Scholl B.J. Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition. 7:2000;377-396.
20. Siddiqi K., Kimia B.B. Parts of visual form: computational aspects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 17:1995;239-251.
21. Siddiqi K., Tresness K.J., Kimia B.B. Parts of visual form: psychophysical aspects. Perception. 25:1996;399-424.
22. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science. 1:1997;261-267.
23. Singh M., Hoffman D. Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. Shipley T., Kellman P. Advances in psychology. Advances in psychology. 130:2001;401-459 Elsevier, New York.
24. Singh M., Seyranian G.D., Hoffman D.D. Parsing silhouettes: the short-cut rule. Perception & Psychophysics. 61:1999;636-660.
25. Trick L.M., Pylyshyn Z.W. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review. 101:(1):1994;80-102.
26. van Oeffelen M.P., Vos P.G. Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: counting by groups. Memory & Cognition. 10:(4):1982;396-404.
27. Wolfe J.M., Bennett S.C. Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research. 37:1997;25-43.