Situating visual search

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 1526-1537

  Nakayama, Ken ^a   Martini, Paolo ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Object recognition; Reinforcement learning

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; LATENT PERIOD; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL SEARCH;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; HUMANS; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960628683     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.003     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Alvarez G.A., Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science 2004, 15(2):106-111.
2. Barlow H.B. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. Journal of Physiology 1953, 119(1):69-88.
3. Barlow H.B. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. Sensory communication 1961, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W.A. Rosenblith (Ed.).
4. Bauer B., Jolicoeur P., Cowan W.B. Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors. Vision Research 1996, 36:1439-1465.
5. Blakemore C., Campbell F.W. On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology 1969, 203:237-260.
6. Bond A.B. The evolution of color polymorphism: Crypticity searching images, and apostatic selection. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 2007, 38:489-514.
7. Bond A.B., Kamil A.C. Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 2002, 415(6872):609-613.
8. Bravo M., Nakayama K. The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 51:465-472.
9. Bridgeman B., Lewis S., Heit G., Nagle M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:692-700.
10. Bruner J.S., Goodman C. Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1947, 42:33-44.
11. Campbell F.W., Cooper G.F., Enroth-Cugell C. The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology 1969, 203:223-235.
12. Chun M.M., Wolfe J.M. Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 30:39-78.
13. Corrado G.S., Sugrue L.P., Seung H.S., Newsome W.T. Linear-nonlinear-Poisson models of primate choice dynamics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2005, 84(3):581-617.
14. Crouzet S.M., Kirchner H., Thorpe S.J. Fast saccades toward faces: Face detection in just 100ms. Journal of Vision 2010, 10:1-17.
15. Dawkins M. Shifts of "attention" in chicks during feeding. Animal Behaviour 1971, 19(3):575-582.
16. Dehaene S., Changeux J.P., Naccache L., Sackur J., Sergent C. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends Cogition Science 2006, 10(5):204-211.
17. Dehaene S., Naccache L., Cohen L., Bihan D.L., Mangin J.F., Poline J.B., et al. Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Natural Neurosciencence 2001, 4(7):752-758.
18. De Valois Russell L., Albrecht Duane G., Thorell Lisa G. Spatial frequency selectivity of cellsin macaque visual cortex. Vision Research 1982, 22(5):545-559.
19. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Spatial vision 1988, Oxford University Press, New York.
20. DiCarlo J.J., Cox D.D. Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:333-341.
21. D'Zmura M. Color in visual search. Vision Research 1991, 31:951-966.
22. Edelman G.M. Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection 1987, Basic Books, New York.
23. Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science 1990, 247:721-723.
24. Finkbeiner M., Song J.H., Nakayama K., Caramazza A. Engaging the motor system with masked orthographic primes: A kinematic analysis. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:11-22.
25. Fukuda M., Ono T., Nishino H., Sasaki K. Visual responses related to food discrimination in monkey lateral hypothalamus during operant feeding behavior. Brain Research 1986, 374(2):249-259.
26. Fukushima K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics 1980, 36:193-202.
27. Goldiamond I. Indicators of perception. 1. Subliminal perception, subception, unconscious perception - An analysis in terms of psychophysical indicator methodology. Psychological Bulletin 1958, 55:373-411.
28. Gross C.G. The genealogy of the "Grandmother Cell" The Neuroscientist 2002, 8:512-518.
29. He Z.J., Nakayama K. Surfaces vs. features in visual search. Nature 1992, 359:231-233.
30. He Z.J., Nakayama K. Visual attention to surfaces in 3-D space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1995, 92:11155-11159.
31. Herrnstein R.J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1961, 4:267-272.
32. Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 2002, 36:791-804.
33. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 1959, 148:574-591.
34. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology London 1968, 215-243.
35. Hung C.P., Krienen G., Poggio T., DiCarlo J.J. Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science 2005, 310:863-866.
36. Hunter I., Davison M. Determination of a behavioral transfer function: White-noise analysis of session-to-session response-ratio dynamics on concurrent VI schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1985, 43(1):43-59.
37. Hurst H.E., Black R.P., Simaika Y.M. Long-term storage, an experimental study 1965, (pp. xiv, 145 p.), Constable, London.
38. Jiang Y., Costello P., et al. A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(45):17048-17052.
39. Joseph J.S., Chun M.M., Nakayama K. Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task. Nature 1997, 387:805-808.
40. Julesz B. Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science 1964, 145:356-362.
41. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature 1981, 290:91-97.
42. Kirchner H., Thorpe S.J. Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research 2006, 46:1762-1776.
43. Klein R. Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature 1988, 334(6181):430-431.
44. Klein R.M., MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 1999, 10(4):346-352.
45. Konorski J. Integrative activity of the brain 1967, U. Chicago Press.
46. Koopman B.O. The theory of search. I. Kinematic bases. Operations Research 1956, 4(3):324-346. CR - Copyright © 1956 INFORMS.
47. Koopman B.O. The theory of search. II. Target detection. Operations Research 1956, 4(5):503-531.
48. Koopman B.O. The theory of search. III. The optimum distribution of searching effort. Operations Research 1957, 5(5):613-626.
49. Koopman B.O. Search and screening: General principles with historical applications 1980, (pp. x, 369 p.), Pergamon Press, Elmsford, N.Y.
50. Kornblum S. Serial-choice reaction time: Inadequacies of the information hypothesis. Science 1968, 159(3813):432-434.
51. Kornblum S. Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. Psychological Review 1969, 76(2):113-131.
52. Krendel E.S., Wodinsky J. Search in an unstructured visual field. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1960, 50:562-568.
53. Kristjansson A. In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science 2000, 11(4):328-332.
54. Lamme V.A.F. Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:12-18.
55. Lau B., Glimcher P.W. Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2005, 84(3):555-579.
56. Lettvin J.Y., Maturana H.R., McCulloch W.S., Pitts W.H. What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proceedings of the IRE 1959, 47(11).
57. Maljkovic V., Martini P. Short-term memory for scenes with affective content. Journal of Vision 2005, 5(3):215-229.
58. Maljkovic V., Martini P. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search. Vision Research 2005, 45(21):2831-2846.
59. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22(6):657-672.
60. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58(7):977-991.
61. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition 2000, 7(5):571-595.
62. Marcel A.J. Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1983, 15:197-237.
63. Marr D. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information 1982, Freeman, New York.
64. Marr D., Hildreth E. Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1980, 207:187-217.
65. McGinnies E. Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychological Review 1949, 56:244-251.
66. Martini P. System identification in Priming of popout. Vision Research 2010, 50:2110-2115.
67. Maunsell J.H. Neuronal representations of cognitive state: Reward or attention?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(6):261-265.
68. Maunsell J.H.R., van Essen D.C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology 1983, 49:1148-1167.
69. Najemnik J., Geisler W.S. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature 2005, 434(7031):387-391.
70. Nakayama K. The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. Vision: Coding and efficiency 1990, 411-422. Cambridge University Press. C. Blakemore (Ed.).
71. Nakayama K., Joseph J.S. Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search. The attentive brain 1998, 279-298. MIT Press, Cambridge. R. Parasuraman (Ed.).
72. Nakayama K., Silverman G.H. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 1986, 320:264-265.
73. Nakayama K., He Z.J., Shimojo S. Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher level vision. Vision in invitation to cognitive science 1995, 1-70. M.I.T. Press. S.M. Kosslyn, D.N. Osherson (Eds.).
74. Poulton E.B. The colours of animals: Their meaning and use especially considered in the case of insects 1890, Kegan Paul, London, 360 pp.
75. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2(11):1019-1025.
76. Schultz W., Dayan P., Montague P.R. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 1997, 275(5306):1593-1599.
77. Schmolesky M.T., Wang Y., Hanes D.P., Thompson K.G., Leutgeb S., Schall J.D., et al. Signal timing across the macaque visual system. Journal of Neurophysiology 1998, 79:3272-3278.
78. Schweickert R. Information, time, and the structure of mental events: A twenty-five-year review. Attention and performance 14: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience 1993, 535-566. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.E. Meyer, S. Kornblum (Eds.).
79. Sutton R.S., Barto A.G. Reinforcement learning: An introduction 1998, (pp. xviii, 322 p.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
80. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1996, 19:109-139.
81. Taylor L.R., Woiwod I.P., Perry J.N. Density-dependence of spatial behavior and rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology 1978, 47(2):383-406.
82. Treisman A.M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12(1):97-136.
83. Ullman S., Vidal-Naquet M., Sali E. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:682-687.
84. Wang Q., Cavanagh P., Green M. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 56:495-500.
85. Weiskrantz L., Warrington E.K., Sanders M.D., Marshall J. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain 1974, 97(4):709-728.
86. Westheimer G. Spatial interaction in human retina during scotopic vision. Journal of Physiology 1965, 181:881-894.
87. Williams M.A., Morris A.P., McGlone F., Abbott D.F., Mattingley J.B. Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(12):2898-2904.
88. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N.M. Rare items often missed in visual searches. Nature 2005, 435(7041):439-440.
89. Wolfe J.M., Van Wert M.J. Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search. Current Biology 2010, 20(2):121-124.