Measuring visual function in age-related macular degeneration with frequency-doubling (matrix) perimetry

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 88, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 806-815

  Anderson, Andrew John ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^b   Werner, John S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

age related macular degeneration; automated perimetry; contrast; frequency doubling; psychophysics; visual acuity; visual field

Indexed keywords

AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION; AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; CONTRAST; FREQUENCY-DOUBLING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

ALGEBRA; DEFECTS; FREQUENCY DOUBLERS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; STATISTICS; TESTING; VISION;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; RETINA MACULA DEGENERATION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MACULAR DEGENERATION; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 79960364554     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31821861bd     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003;16:213-25. (Pubitemid 36666041)
2. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, Fingeret M, Keltner JL, Spry PG, Wall M, Werner JS. Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1540-8.
3. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999.
4. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:571-81. (Pubitemid 29402656)
5. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2451-7. (Pubitemid 43119493)
6. Huang CQ, Carolan J, Redline D, Taravati P, Woodward KR, Johnson CA, Wall M, Keltner JL. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: Comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:917-23.
7. Taravati P, Woodward KR, Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Redline D, Carolan J, Huang CQ, Wall M. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:924-8.
8. Mayer MJ, Spiegler SJ, Ward B, Glucs A, Kim CB. Foveal flicker sensitivity discriminates ARM-risk from healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:3143-9.
9. Phipps JA, Guymer RH, Vingrys AJ. Temporal sensitivity deficits in patients with high-risk drusen. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27: 265-7. (Pubitemid 29429705)
10. Phipps JA, Dang TM, Vingrys AJ, Guymer RH. Flicker perimetry losses in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3355-60. (Pubitemid 39121876)
11. Mayer MJ, Ward B, Klein R, Talcott JB, Dougherty RF, Glucs A. Flicker sensitivity and fundus appearance in pre-exudative age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:1138-49. (Pubitemid 24079849)
12. Maier M, Groneberg T, Specht H, Lohmann CP. Critical flickerfusion frequency in age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:409-13.
13. West SK, Rosenthal F, Newland HS, Taylor HR. Use of photographic techniques to grade nuclear cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:73-7. (Pubitemid 18038773)
14. Casson RJ, James B. Effect of cataract on frequency doubling perimetry in the screening mode. J Glaucoma 2006;15:23-5. (Pubitemid 43068415)
15. Ueda T, Ota T, Yukawa E, Hara Y. Frequency doubling technology perimetry after clear and yellow intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:856-8. (Pubitemid 44584125)
16. Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A, Neville S. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1569-71. (Pubitemid 41729899)
17. Arvind H, George R, Baskaran M, Raju P, Ramesh SV, Paul PG, Vijaya L. Effect of cataract surgery with intraocular lens implant on frequency doubling perimetry. Curr Eye Res 2005;30:123-8. (Pubitemid 40516088)
18. Tanna AP, Abraham C, Lai J, Shen J. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology 2004; 111:1504-7. (Pubitemid 39030802)
19. Kook MS, Yang SJ, Kim S, Chung J, Kim ST, Tchah H. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:85-90. (Pubitemid 38850253)
20. Carrillo MM, Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Effect of cataract extraction on the visual fields of patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:929-32. (Pubitemid 41057989)
21. Heijl A, Krakau CE. A note on fixation during perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1977;55:854-61. (Pubitemid 8199920)
22. Motulsky H, Christopoulos A. Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004.
23. Beech DG. Some notes on the precision of the gradient of an estimated straight line. Appl Stat 1961;10:14-31.
24. Peli E. Contrast in complex images. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1990;7: 2032-40.
25. Sun H, Dul MW, Swanson WH. Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and Gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83:455-65.
26. Shapley RM, Enroth-Cugell C. Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. In: Osborne NN, Chader GJ, eds. Progress in Retinal Research. New York: Pergamon; 1984:263-346.
27. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Signal/noise analysis to compare tests for measuring visual field loss and its progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4700-8.
28. Johnson LN, Aminlari A, Sassani JW. Effect of intermittent versus continuous patient monitoring on reliability indices during automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1993;100:76-84. (Pubitemid 23041134)
29. Tolentino MJ, Miller S, Gaudio AR, Sandberg MA. Visual field deficits in early age-related macular degeneration. Vision Res 1994; 34:409-13. (Pubitemid 24031161)
30. Cacho I, Dickinson CM, Smith HJ, Harper RA. Clinical impairment measures and reading performance in a large age-related macular degeneration group. Optom Vis Sci 2010;87:344-9.
31. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequencydoubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42:1404-10. (Pubitemid 32381988)
32. Spry PG, Hussin HM, Sparrow JM. Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1031-5. (Pubitemid 41081419)
33. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:340-5. (Pubitemid 46425561)
34. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Patel A, Bilonick RA, Ishikawa H, Kagemann L, Dilworth WD, Schuman JS. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91:933-8. (Pubitemid 47013108)
35. Vingrys AJ, Pesudovs K. Localized scotomata detected with temporal modulation perimetry in central serous chorioretinopathy. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27:109-16. (Pubitemid 29294816)
36. Anderson AJ, Vingrys AJ. Multiple processes mediate flicker sensitivity. Vision Res 2001;41:2449-55. (Pubitemid 32718646)
37. Anderson AJ, Vingrys AJ. Interactions between flicker thresholds and luminance pedestals. Vision Res 2000;40:2579-88. (Pubitemid 30616349)
38. Phipps JA, Guymer RH, Vingrys AJ. Loss of cone function in age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44: 2277-83. (Pubitemid 36520327)
39. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-9.
40. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Anatomy of a supergroup: Does a criterion of normal perimetric performance generate a supernormal population? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5043-8. (Pubitemid 37315324)
41. Mayer MJ, Spiegler SJ, Ward B, Glucs A, Kim CB. Preliminary evaluation of flicker sensitivity as a predictive test for exudative agerelated maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:3150-5.
42. Westheimer G. The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field. Vision Res 1982;22:157-62. (Pubitemid 12210564)
43. Anderson AJ. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method. Vision Res 2003;43:165-70. (Pubitemid 36106482)
44. Vinding T. Visual impairment of age-related macular degeneration. An epidemiological study of 1000 aged individuals. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990;68:162-7. (Pubitemid 20145449)
45. von Noorden GK, Mackensen G. Phenomenology of eccentric fixation. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;53:642-60.
46. Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ. Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the mp-1 microperimeter. Retina 2008;28:125-33.