Sensitivity and specificity of the humphrey matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 924-928

  Taravati, Parisa ^a,b   Woodward, Kimberly R ^a,b   Keltner, John L ^c   Johnson, Chris A ^d   Redline, Danie ^c   Carolan, James ^c   Huang, Charles Q ^c   Wall, Michael ^a,b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; FEMALE; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 41949130491     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0248     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1277-1283.
2. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
3. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:213-225.
4. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
5. Kelly DH. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opto Soc Am. 1981;9:1051-1055.
6. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599.
7. Medieros F, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:863-871.
8. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 4147-4152.
9. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:322-331.
10. Vingrys AJ, Pianta MJ. Developing a clinical probability density function for automated perimetry. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1998; 26(suppl 1):S101-S103.