Effect of cataract surgery with intraocular lens implant on frequency doubling perimetry

Current Eye Research

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 123-128

  Arvind, Hemamalini ^a   George, Ronnie ^a   Baskaran, M ^a   Raju, Prema ^a   Ve Ramesh, S ^a   Paul, Pradeep G ^a   Vijaya, Lingam ^a,b  

^a VISION RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (India)

^b MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (India)

Author keywords

Cataract surgery; Contrast; Frequency doubling perimetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETRY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 17144369932     PISSN: 02713683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02713680490904278     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:1628-1633.
2. Kelly DH. Non-linear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am. 1981;71:1051-1055.
3. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:314-322.
4. Patel SC, Friedman DS, Varadkar P, Robin AL. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:323-327.
5. Ronnie JG, Thomas R, Bhat S, Muliyil JP, Parikh R, George R. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:46-50.
6. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss using the frequency-doubling contrast test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:44413-44425.
7. Ronnie JG, Thomas D, Thomas R, et al. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:734-741.
8. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
9. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:830-836.
10. Dandona L, Dandona R, Naduvilath TJ, McCarty CA, Srinivas M, Mandal P, Nanda A, Rao GN. Burden of moderate visual impairment in an urban population in Southern India. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:497-504.
11. Thylefors B, Negral AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73:115-121.
12. Johnson CA, Wall M, Fingeret M, et al. A primer for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Skaneateles, NY: Welch Allyn; 1998.
13. Chylack LT, Leske MC, McCarty D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:991-997.
14. Lester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, Zingirian M, Traverso CE. Learning effect, Short-term fluctuation and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;130:160-164.
15. Brush MB, Chen PP. Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening mode frequency doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:273-277.
16. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, Farber MD, Ticho U, Blumenthal EZ. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:511-516.
17. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, Araie M. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency doubling technology perimetry. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:467-473.
18. Thomas R, Kuriyakose T, George T. Towards achieving small-incision cataract surgery 99.8% of the time. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000;48:145-151.
19. Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP, Leen MM, Lieberman MF, Stamper RL, Stanford DC. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1479-1484.
20. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:213-225.
21. Sponsel WE, Trigo Y, Hendricks J, Lloyd C. Frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:155-156.
22. Lam BL, Alward WLM, Kolder HE. Effect of cataract on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1066-1070.
23. Chen PP, Budenz DL. The effects of cataract extraction on the visual field of eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:325-333.
24. Delgado MF, Nguyen NTA, Cox TA, Singh K, Lee DA, Dueker DK, Fechtner RD, Juzych MS, Lin SC, Netland PA, Pastor SA, Schuman JS, Samples JR. Automated perimetry-A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:2362-2374.
25. Elliot DB, Hurst MA. Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:822-825.
26. Superstein R, Boyaner D, Overbury Q. Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:575-581.
27. Superstein R, Boyaner D, Overbury Q, Collin C. Glare disability and contrast sensitivity before and after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:248-253.
28. Rubin DS, Adamsons WA, Stark DJ. Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:56-61.