Effect of cataract on frequency doubling perimetry in the screening mode

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 23-25

  Casson, Robert J ^a,b   James, Bruce ^a  

^a STOKE MANDEVILLE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cataract; Frequency doubling technology; Perimetry

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERIMETRY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING;

AGED; CATARACT; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; PERIMETRY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 30344455286     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000197089.53354.6f     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 413-425.
2. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:314-322.
3. Casson R, James B, Rubinstein A, et al. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:360-362.
4. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:831-836.
5. White AJ, Sun H, Swanson WH, et al. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599.
6. Lam BL, Alward WL, Kolder HE. Effect of cataract on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1066-1070.
7. Moss ID, Wild JM, Whitaker DJ. The influence of age-related cataract on blue-on-yellow perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:764-773.
8. Kook MS, Yang SJ, Kim S, et al. Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:85-90.
9. Tanna AP, Abraham C, Lai J, et al. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2004;111: 1504-1507.
10. Realini T, Lai MQ, Barber L. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2133-2136.
11. Ivers RQ, Mitchell P, Cumming RG. Lack of association between localized cataract and visual field loss: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Atist N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25:193-198.
12. Lachenmayr BJ, Gleissner M. Flicker perimetry resists retinal image degradation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3539-3542.
13. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4147-4152.
14. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, et al. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:467-473.