Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 2451-2457

  Artes, Paul H ^a,b   Hutchison, Donna M ^a   Nicolela, Marcelo T ^a   Leblanc, Raymond P ^a   Chauhan, Balwantray C ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL THRESHOLD; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 23244450857     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0135     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43: 2654-2659.
2. Schulzer M. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1589-1594.
3. Kim J, Dally LG, Ederer F, et al. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 14. Distinguishing progression of glaucoma from visual field fluctuations. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2109-2116.
4. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Quigg JM, et al. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1187-1194.
5. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:286-293.
6. Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, et al. The European glaucoma prevention study: design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1612-1621.
7. Vesti E, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3873-3879.
8. Alward WL. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129:376-378.
9. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1404-1410.
10. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40: 648-656.
11. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency-doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:322-331.
12. Hastie T, Stuetzle W. Principal curves. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84: 502-516.
13. Vingrys AJ, Pianta MJ. A new look at threshold estimation algorithms for automated static perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76: 588-595.
14. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:709-715.
15. King-Smith PE, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC, Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res. 1994;34:885-912.
16. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:268-272.
17. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects: Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:165-169.
18. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375.
19. Hastie TR, Weingessel A. Princurve: fits a principal curve in arbitrary dimension. S original by Trevor Hastie, R port by Andreas Weingessel. R package version 1.1-7 (2004).
20. R Development Core Team (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project. org.
21. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using a 24-2 test pattern. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:315-320.
22. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, Faragher EB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:417-421.
23. Swanson WH, Dul MW, Fischer SE. Quantifying effects of retinal illuminance on frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:235-240.