Signal detection and threshold models of source memory

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 293-311

  Schütz, Julia ^a   Bröder, Arndt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multinomial modeling; Signal detection; Source monitoring; Threshold models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; HUMAN; MEMORY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; VISION;

DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960188818     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000097     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Banks, W. P. (2000). Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychological Science, 11, 271-277.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
4. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, itemdetection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
5. Bröder, A., & Meiser, T. (2007). Measuring source memory. Zeitschrift fü r Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215, 52-60.
6. Bröder, A., Noethen, D., Schü tz, J., & Bay, P. (2007). Utilization of covariation knowledge in source monitoring: No evidence for implicit processes. Psychological Research, 71, 524-538.
7. Bröder, A., & Schü tz, J. (2009). Recognition ROCs are curvilinear - Or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 587-606.
8. Cansino, S., Maquet, P., Dolan, R. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1047-1056.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. DeCarlo, L. T. (2003). Source monitoring and multivariate signal detection theory, with a model for selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 292-303.
11. Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
12. Elfman, K.W., Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2008). Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 752-768.
13. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-97.
14. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (1995). Interaction of stimulus attributes, base rates and feedback in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1075-1095.
15. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
16. Glanzer, M., Hilford, A., & Kim, K. (2004). Six regularities of source recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1176-1195. (Pubitemid 39454032)
17. Glisky, E. L., & Kong, L. L. (2008). Do young and older adults rely on different processes in source memory tasks? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 809-822.
18. Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms]. Gö ttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
19. Hautus, M. J., Macmillan, N. A., & Rotello, C. M. (2008). Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 889-905.
20. Healy, A. F., & Kubovy, M. (1978). The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cut-off location in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 544-553.
21. Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Crossmodal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 321-335.
22. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., Kim, K., & DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 494-510.
23. Hu, X. (1991). Statistical inference program for multinomial binary tree models (Version 1.0) [Computer program]. Irvine, CA: University of California.
24. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
25. Kinchla, R. A. (1994). Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. Psychological Review, 101, 166-171.
26. King-Smith, P. E. (2005). Threshold nonlinearities and signal detection theory. Perception, 34, 941-946. (Pubitemid 41623998)
27. Klauer, K., & Kellen, D. (2010). Toward a complete decision model of item and source memory: A discrete-state approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 465-478.
28. Krantz, D. H. (1969). Threshold theories of signal detection. Psychological Review, 76, 308-324.
29. Kuo, T. Y., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Perceptual difficulty in source memory encoding and retrieval: Prefrontal versus parietal electrical brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2243-2257.
30. Lockhart, R. S., & Murdock, B. B. (1970). Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 100-109.
31. Luce, R. D. (1963). A threshold theory for simple detection experiment. Psychological Review, 70, 61-79.
32. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Malmberg, K. J. (2002). On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 380-387.
34. Malmberg, K. J., & Xu, J. (2006). The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 99-105. (Pubitemid 44411985)
35. McNicol, D. (2005). A primer of signal detection theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Meiser, T. (2005). A hierarchy of multinomial models for multidimensional source monitoring. Methodology, 1, 2-17.
37. Meiser, T., & Bröder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
38. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: The role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 599-614. (Pubitemid 39525575)
39. Mickes, L., Wais, P. E., & Wixted, J. T. (2009). Recollection is a continuous process. Implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory. Psychological Science, 11, 1-7.
40. Moldakarimov, S. B., McClelland, J. L., & Ermentrout, G. B. (2006). A homeostatic rule for inhibitory synapses promotes temporal sharpening and cortical reorganization. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 16526-16531. (Pubitemid 44715229)
41. Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42-54.
42. Mueller, S. T., & Weidemann, C. T. (2008). Decision noise: An explanation for observed violations of signal detection theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 465-494.
43. Murnane, K., & Bayen, U. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417-428. (Pubitemid 26249645)
44. Psychology Software Tools (1996-2006). E-Prime (version 1.2) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
45. Qin, J., Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., & Mitchell, K. J. (2001). Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1110-1115. (Pubitemid 33683975)
46. R Development Core Team. (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Retrieved from http:// www.Rproject.org.
47. Rhodes, M. G., & Jacoby, L. L. (2007). On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: Effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 305-320.
48. Rothkegel, R. (1999). AppleTree: A multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 696-700.
49. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
50. Shimamura, A. P., & Wickens, T. D. (2009). Superadditive memory strength for item and source recognition: The role of hierarchical relational binding in the medial temporal lobe. Psychological Review, 116, 1-19.
51. Slotnick, S. D., & Dodson, C. S. (2005). Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory & Cognition, 33, 151-170. (Pubitemid 350042530)
52. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
53. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
54. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
55. Starns, J. J., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1213-1220. (Pubitemid 43083724)
56. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267-273.
57. Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 582-600.
58. Van Zandt, T., & Maldonado-Molina, M. M. (2004). Response reversals in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1147-1166. (Pubitemid 39454030)
59. Vogt, V., & Bröder, A. (2007). Independent retrieval of source dimensions: An extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 443-450.
60. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.
62. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). Recognition memory ROCs and the dual-process signal - detection model: Comment on Glanzer, Kim, Hilford, and Adams (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 514-521.
63. Yonelinas, A. P., & Parks, C. M. (2007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 800-832.