On the role of learning theories in furthering software engineering education

Software Engineering: Effective Teaching and Learning Approaches and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 38-59

  Navarro, Emily Oh ^a   van der Hoek, André ^a  

^a 5226 Donald Bren Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959935783     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-102-5.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Abernethy, K., & Kelly, J. (2000). Technology transfer issues for formal methods of software specification. In S. A. Mengel & P. J. Knoke (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 23-31). Austin, TX: IEEE Computer Society.
2. Baker, A., Navarro, E. O., & van der Hoek, A. (2003). Problems and programmers: An educational software engineering card game. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on software engineering (pp. 614-619). Portland, Oregon.
3. Beckman, K., Khajenoori, K., Coulter, N., & Mead, N. R. (1997). Collaborations: Closing the industry-academia gap. IEEE Software, 14(6), 49-57.
4. Blake, B. M. (2003). A student-enacted simulation approach to software engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(1), 124-132.
5. Bruner, J. S. (1967). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
6. Collofello, J. S. (2000). University/industry collaboration in developing a simulation based software project management training course. In S. Mengel & P. J. Knoke (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 161-168). Austin, TX: IEEE Computer Society.
7. Dantas, A. R., Barros, M. O., & Werner, C. M. L. (2004). A simulation-based game for project management experiential learning. In Proceedings of the 2004 international conference on software engineering and knowledge engineering. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
8. Dawson, R. (2000). Twenty dirty tricks to train software engineers. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on software engineering (pp. 209-218): ACM.
9. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
10. Drappa, A., & Ludewig, J. (2000). Simulation in software engineering training. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on software engineering (pp. 199-208): ACM.
11. Favela, J., & Pena-Mora, F. (2001). An experience in collaborative software engineering education. IEEE Software, 18(2), 47-53.
12. Ferrari, M., Taylor, R., & VanLehn, K. (1999). Adapting work simulations for schools. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(1), 25-53.
13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
14. Gibbons, A. S. (2001). Model-centered instruction. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(4), 511-540.
15. Gnatz, M., Kof, L., Prilmeier, F., & Seifert, T. (2003). A practical approach of teaching software engineering. In P. J. Knoke, A. Moreno & M. Ryan (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 120-128). Madrid, Spain: IEEE.
16. Goold, A., & Horan, P. (2002). Foundation software engineering practices for capstone projects and beyond. In M. McCracken, M. Lutz & T. C. Lethbridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 140-146). Covington, KY, USA: IEEE.
17. Groth, D. P., & Robertson, E. L. (2001). It's all about process: Project-oriented teaching of software engineering. In D. Ramsey, P. Bourque & R. Dupuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 7-17). Charlotte, NC, USA: IEEE.
18. Halling, M., Zuser, W., Kohle, M., & Biffl, S. (2002). Teaching the unified process to under-graduate students. In M. McCracken, M. Lutz & T. C. Lethbridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 148-159). Covington, KY, USA: IEEE.
19. Hayes, J. H. (2002). Energizing software engineering education through real-world projects as experimental studies. In M. McCracken, M. Lutz & T. C. Lethbridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 192-206). Covington, KY: IEEE.
20. Hilburn, T. (1999). PSP metrics in support of software engineering education. In H. Saiedian (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 135-136). New Orleans, LA, USA: IEEE.
21. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
23. Knowles, M. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
24. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
25. Kolikant, Y. B. (2001). Gardeners and cinema tickets: High school students' preconceptions of concurrency. Computer Science Education, 11(3), 221-245.
26. Kornecki, A. J. (2000). Real-time computing in software engineering education. In S. A. Mengel & P. J. Knoke (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 197-198). Austin, TX, USA: IEEE.
27. Kornecki, A. J., Khajenoori, S., & Gluch, D. (2003). On a partnership between software industry and academia. In P. J. Knoke, A. Moreno & M. Ryan (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 60-69). Madrid, Spain: IEEE.
28. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. McKim, J. C., & Ellis, H. J. C. (2004). Using a multiple term project to teach object-oriented programming and design. In T. B. Horton & A. E. K. Sobel (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 59-64). Norfolk, VA: IEEE.
30. Navarro, E. O. (2005). A survey of software engineering educational delivery methods and associated learning theories (Technical Report No. UCI-ISR-05-5). Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine.
31. Navarro, E. O. (2006). SimSE: A software engineering simulation environment for software process education. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
32. Navarro, E. O., & van der Hoek, A. (2005a). Design and evaluation of an educational software process simulation environment and associated model. In T. C. Lethbridge & D. Port (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on software engineering education and training. Ottawa, Canada: IEEE.
33. Navarro, E. O., & van der Hoek, A. (2005b). Scaling up: How thirty-two students collaborated and succeeded in developing a prototype software design environment. In T. C. Lethbridge & D. Port (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on software engineering education and training. Ottawa, Canada: IEEE.
34. Navarro, E. O., & van der Hoek, A. (2007). Comprehensive evaluation of an educational software engineering simulation environment. In H. Edwards & R. Narayanan (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth conference on software engineering education and training. Dublin, Ireland.
35. Nulden, U., & Scheepers, H. (2000). Understanding and learning about escalation: Simulation in action. In Proceedings of the 3rd process simulation modeling workshop (prosim 2000). London, United Kingdom.
36. Ohlsson, L., & Johansson, C. (1995). A practice driven approach to software engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 38(3), 291-295.
37. Pfahl, D., Klemm, M., & Ruhe, G. (2000). Using system dynamics simulation models for software project management education and training. In Proceedings of the 3rd process simulation modeling workshop (prosim 2000). London, United Kingdom.
38. Reigeluth, C. M., & Rodgers, C. A. (1980). The elaboration theory of instruction: Prescriptions for task analysis and design. NSPI Journal, 19, 16-26.
39. Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Schank, R. C. (1997). Virtual learning. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
41. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Sharp, H., & Hall, P. (2000). An interactive multimedia software house simulation for postgraduate software engineers. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on software engineering (pp. 688-691): ACM.
43. Stevens, S. M. (1989). Intelligent interactive video simulation of a code inspection. Communications of the ACM, 32(7), 832-843.
44. Tomayko, J. E. (1996). Carnegie Mellon's software development studio: A five year retrospective. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 119-129). Daytona Beach, FL, USA: IEEE.
45. van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It's not just the digital natives who are restless. Educause Review, 41(2), 17-30.
46. Wohlin, C., & Regnell, B. (1999). Achieving industrial relevance in software engineering education. In H. Saiedian (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth conference on software engineering education and training (pp. 16-25): IEEE Computer Society.