Teaching the unified process to undergraduate students

Software Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 148-159

  Halling, Michael ^a   Zuser, Wolfgang ^a   Köhle, Monika ^a   Biffl, Stefan ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Application software; Communication industry; Communication standards; Education; Interactive systems; Investments; Programming; Reliability engineering; Software engineering; Standards development

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INVESTMENTS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; STANDARDS; TEACHING;

COMMUNICATION INDUSTRY; COMMUNICATION STANDARDS; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; RELIABILITY ENGINEERING; STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84948454337     PISSN: 10930175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/CSEE.2002.995207     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ambler S.W., Enhancing the Unified Process with process patterns; Cutter-IT-Journal, vol. 13, no. 8, Aug. 2000
2. Bagert D., Hilburn T., Hislop G., Lutz M., McCracken M., Mengel S., Guidelines for Software Engineering Education Version 1.0; Tech.report CMU-SEI-99-TR-032 ESC-TR-99-002
3. Beck K., Extreme programming: a humanistic discipline of software development Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. First International Conference, FASE'98, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS'98 Proceedings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany; 1998, pp. p.1-6.
4. Boehm, B., Kaiser, G., Port, D., A Combined Curriculum Research and Curriculum Development Approach for Software Engineering Education, Conference on SE Education and Training, 2000.
5. Biffl S., Grechenig T., Teaching software engineering and project management to 300 participants without drain of quality or intensity; SIGCSE-Bulletin, vol.29, no.3, Sept. 1997; p.51-3.
6. Biffl S. and Grechenig T., Preparing students for industrial teamwork: a seasoned software engineering curriculum; IEE Proceedings-Software, Feb. 1998
7. Booch, G., The Unified Modeling Language; Unix-Review, vol.14, no.13; Dec. 1996; p.41-4, 46, 48.
8. SM in the Large Class, Conference on SE Education and Training, 2001.
9. Coad Peter, Yourdon Edward, Object-oriented analysis; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Yourdon Press, 1990.
10. Coad Peter, Yourdon Edward, Object-oriented design: [OOD]; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Yourdon Press, 1991.
11. Coad Peter, Nicola Jill, Object-oriented programming; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Yourdon Press, 1993.
12. Dawson, R., Newsham, R., Introducing Software Engineers to the Real World, IEEE Software, Nov/Dec 1997.
13. Dawson, R., Twenty Dirty Tricks to Train Software Engineers, International Conference on Software Engineering, 2000.
14. Faulk, S. R., Achieving Industrial Relevance with Academic Excellence: Lessons from the Oregon Master of Software Engineering, International Conference on Software Engineering, 2000.
15. Goldberg A., Robson D., Smalltalk-80: The Language and Its Implementation; Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1983.
16. Grechenig T. and Biffl S., 'The Challenge of Introducing the Object-Oriented Paradigm - An Empirical Investigation of a Software-Engineering Course', J. of Structured Programming, 1993, 14, (4), pp.187-198.
17. Greefhorst D., van Elswijk M., Properties of modern development models; Informatie, vol. 42, spec. issue, Sept. 2000
18. Henderson-Sellers B., Younessi H., Graham I.S., The Open Process Specification; Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1997
19. Henderson Sellers B., OPEN and RUP: how do they compare?; JOOP, vol. 13, no.4, July-Aug. 2000
20. Henderson Sellers B. et al., Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective; Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference. APSEC 2000.
21. Henderson Sellers B., Collins G., Graham I., UML-compatible processes; Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001.
22. th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999.
23. Humphrey W.S., The personal process in software engineering; Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Software Process. Applying the Software Process, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994; pp. p.69-77.
24. Jacobson I., Booch G., Rumbaugh J., The Unified Development Process; Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999
25. Kruchten, P. The Rational Unified Process. An Introduction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999
26. McMillan, W. W., What Leading Practitioners Say Should Be Emphasized in Students' Software Engineering Projects, Conference on SE Education and Training, 1999.
27. Meyer, B., Software Engineering in the Academy, Computer, May 2001.
28. Open Letter to the Industry, Premature methods standardization considered harmful; The Journal of Object Oriented Programming, vol. 6, no. 4, 1993.
29. Robillard, P.N.; Kruchten, P.; d'Astous, P., Yoopeedoo (UPEDU): a process for teaching software process; 14th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2001.
30. Shaw M., Software Engineering Education: A Roadmap; ACM Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, 2000.
31. Shepard, T., An Efficient Set of Software Degree Programs for One Domain, International Conference on Software Engineering, 2001.
32. th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2000.
33. Tvedt, J. D., Tesoriero, R., Gary, K. A., The Software Factory: Combining Undergraduate Computer Science and Software Engineering Education, International Conference on Software Engineering, 2001.
34. Zuser W., Biffl S., Grechenig T., Köhle M., Software Engineering mit UML und dem Unified Process; Munich, Pearson Studium, will be published in Oktober 2001