Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 718-725

  Razavi, Touraj ^a   Palmer, Richard M ^a   Davies, Jonathan ^a   Wilson, Ron ^a   Palmer, Paul J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuitomo 3D ; CBCT; Cortical bone; Dental implant; I CAT

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CATTLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; RIB; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; BOVINAE; DEVICES; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; CATTLE; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; REFERENCE VALUES; RIBS;

TOOTH IMPLANT;

EID: 77954576900     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01905.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chiodo TA, Ziccardi VB, Janal M, Sabitini C. Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional synthes mandibular plates: a laboratory model. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2006, 64:1475-1479.
2. Choi BH, Huh JY, Suh CH, Kim KN. An in vitro evaluation of miniplate fixation techniques for fractures of the atrophic edentulous mandible. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2005, 34:174-177.
3. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Muller S, Mueller-Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2007, 36:198-203.
4. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America 2008, 52:707-730.
5. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clinical Oral Investigations 2006, 10:1-7.
6. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2008, 37:268-273.
7. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2004, 19:228-231.
8. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2004, 33:291-294.
9. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van DE, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Radiology 2008a, 71:461-468.
10. Loubele M, Van AN, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 2008b, 105:512-518.
11. Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. American Journal of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopaedics 2004, 126:308-309.
12. May KB, Edge MJ, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. The precision of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997, 77:497-502.
13. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. European Journal of Radiology 1998, 8:1558-1564.
14. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2006, 35:410-416.
15. Sandborg M, Alm Carlsson G, Persliden J, Dance DR. Comparison of different materials for test phantoms in diagnostic radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1993, 49:345-347.
16. Shmueli K, Thomas DL, Ordidge RJ. Design, construction and evaluation of an anthropomorphic head phantom with realistic susceptibility artefacts. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007, 26:202-207.
17. Stavropoulos A, Wenzel A. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws. Clinical Oral Investigation 2007, 11:101-106.
18. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2008, 37:80-93.
19. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 2003, 6((Suppl. 1)):31-36.
20. Practice guideline for digital radiography. The American College of Radiology 2007, The American College of Radiology, (Res. 42), 18
21. Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dental Clinics of North America 2008, 52:825-841, vii.
22. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Frydenberg M, Kirkevang LL. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodonology 2009, 108:939-945.
23. Wiegert J, Bertram M, Wulff J, Schafer D, Weeseb J, Netschc T, Schomberg H, Rose G. 3D ROI imaging for cone-beam computed tomography. International Congress Series 2004, 1268:7-12.
24. Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zhu XR, Lee AK, Chambers M, Dong L. Reducing metal artefacts in cone-beam CT images by pre-processing projection data. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2007, 67:924-932.