Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions

Cortex

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 908-930

  Molinaro, Nicola ^a   Barber, Horacio A ^b   Carreiras, Manuel ^a,c,d  

^a BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^c BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agreement comprehension; ERPs; LAN; N400; P600

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; GENDER; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MORPHOLOGY; READING;

EID: 79959874813     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.019     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Angrilli A., Penolazzi B., Vespignani F., De Vincenzi M., Job R., Ciccarelli L., et al. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters 2002, 322(1):5-8.
2. Balconi M., Pozzoli U. Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2005, 34(1):71-98.
3. Barber H.A., Carreiras M. Integrating gender and number information in Spanish word pairs: An ERP study. Cortex 2003, 39(3):465-482.
4. Barber H.A., Carreiras M. Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(1):137-153.
5. Barber H.A., Kutas M. Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews 2007, 53(1):98-123.
6. Barber H.A., Salillas E., Carreiras M. Gender or genders agreement?. On-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond 2004, 309-328. Psychology Press, London. M. Carreiras, C. Clifton (Eds.).
7. Bates E., McNew S., MacWhinney B., Devescovi A., Smith S. Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition 1982, 11(3):245-299.
8. Benveniste E. Problèmes de Linguistique Generale 1966, Gallimard, Paris.
9. Bock K., Eberhard K.M. The meaning, sound, and syntax of English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8(1):57-99.
10. Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M. The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 2006, 113(4):787-821.
11. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews 2008, 59(1):55-73.
12. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5(1):34-44.
13. Bybee J. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form, Typological Studies in Language 99 1985, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
14. Carminati M.N. Processing reflexes of hierarchy (Person > Number > Gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 2005, 115(3):259-285.
15. Carreiras M., Salillas E., Barber H.A. Event-related potentials elicited during parsing of ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish. Cognitive Brain Research 2004, 20(1):98-105.
16. Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding 1981, Foris, Dordrecht.
17. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program 1995, MIT Press, Boston.
18. Corbett G. Number 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Coulson S., King J., Kutas M. Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 1998, 13(1):21-58.
20. Dambacher M., Kliegl R., Hofmann M., Jacobs A.M. Frequency and predictability effects on event related potentials during reading. Brain Research 2006, 1084(1):89-103.
21. De Vincenzi M. Differences between the morphology of gender and number: Evidence from establishing coreferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1999, 28(5):537-553.
22. De Vincenzi M., Job R., Di Matteo R., Angrilli A., Penolazzi B., Ciccarelli L., et al. Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain and Language 2003, 85(2):280-296.
23. Demestre J., Meltzer S., García-Albea J.E., Vigil A. Identifying the null subject: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1999, 28(3):293-312.
24. Deutsch A., Bentin S. Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew: Evidence from ERPs and eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 45(2):200-224.
25. Eberhard K.M., Cutting J.C., Bock K. Making sense of syntax: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 2005, 112(3):531-559.
26. Faussart C., Jacubowicz C., Costes M. Gender and number processing in spoken French and Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 1999, 11(1):75-101.
27. Federmeier K.D. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 2007, 44(4):491-505.
28. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., Friederici A.D. Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47(2):250-272.
29. Frazier L., Clifton C. Construal 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge.
30. Frazier L., Fodor J.D. The sausage-machine: A new two-stage model of the parser. Cognition 1978, 6(4):291-325.
31. Frenck-Mestre C., Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Foucalt A. The effect of phonological realization of inflectional morphology on verbal agreement in French: Evidence from ERPs. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128(3):528-536.
32. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6(2):78-84.
33. Friederici A.D. Event-related brain potentials studies in language. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2004, 4(6):466-470.
34. Friederici A.D., Hahne A., von Cramon D.Y. First-pass versus second-pass parsing processes in a Wernicke's and a Broca's aphasic: Electrophysiological evidence for a double dissociation. Brain and Language 1998, 62(3):311-341.
35. Friederici A.D., Hahne A., Saddy D. Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2002, 31(1):45-63.
36. Friederici A.D., Mecklinger A., Spencer K.M., Steinhauer K., Donchin E. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: A spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 11(2):305-323.
37. Friederici A.D., von Cramon D.Y., Kotz S.A. Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions. Brain 1999, 122(6):1033-1047.
38. Greenberg J. Universals of language 1963, MIT Press, Cambridge.
39. Grodzinsky Y., Friederici A.D. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2006, 16(2):240-246.
40. Gunter T.C., Friederici A.D., Schriefers H. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(4):56-68.
41. Hagoort P. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(6):883-899.
42. Hagoort P. On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9(9):416-423.
43. Hagoort P., Brown C.M. Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1999, 28(6):715-728.
44. Hagoort P., Brown C.M. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(11):1531-1549.
45. Hagoort P., Brown C.M. ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(11):1518-1530.
46. Hagoort P., Brown C.M., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8(4):439-483.
47. Hagoort P., Wassenaar M., Brown C.M. Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003, 100(7):4340-4345.
48. Harley H., Ritter E. Person and number in pronouns: Motivating a feature-geometric analysis. Language 2002, 78(3):482-526.
49. Hinojosa J.A., Martin-Loeches M., Casado P., Munoz F., Rubia F.J. Similarities and differences between phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations in Spanish: An event-related potentials study. Language and Cognitive Processes 2003, 18(2):113-142.
50. Holcomb P.J. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology 1993, 30(1):47-61.
51. Kaan E. Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in agreement processing: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2002, 31(2):165-193.
52. Kaan E., Harris A., Gibson E., Holcomb P.J. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15(2):159-201.
53. Kaan E., Swaab T.Y. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(1):98-110.
54. Kennison S.M. Different time courses of integrative semantic processing for plural and singular nouns: Implications for theories of sentence processing. Cognition 2005, 97(3):269-294.
55. King W.K., Kutas M. Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters 1998, 244(2):61-64.
56. Kluender R., Kutas M. Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5(2):196-214.
57. Kuperberg G.R. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 2007, 1146:23-49.
58. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. N400. Scholarpedia 2009, 4:77-90.
59. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition 1983, 11(5):539-550.
60. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Brain potentials reflect word expectancy and semantic association during reading. Nature 1984, 307:161-163.
61. Kutas M., Van Petten C., Kluender R. Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. Handbook of Psycholinguistics 2006, 659-724. Elsevier, New York. 2nd ed. M. Traxler, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
62. Lau E.F., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9(12):920-933.
63. Leinonen A., Brattico P., Jarvenpaa M., Krause C.M. Event-related potential responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish. Brain Research 2008, 1218:181-193.
64. MacWhinney B., Bates E. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing 1989, Cambridge University Press, New York.
65. Mancini S, Molinaro N, Rizzi L, and Carreiras, M. When persons disagree: an ERP study of Unagreement in Spanish. Psychophysiology, in press.
66. Mancini S, Molinaro N, Rizzi L, and Carreiras M. A person is not a number: Discourse involvement in subject-verb agreement computation, submitted for publication.
67. Mancini S., Vespignani F., Molinaro N., Laudanna A., Rizzi L. Number Agreement Processing with Different Persons: An ERP Study 2009, Poster presented at the 15th Amlap Conference. Barcelona, Spain, September, 7-9.
68. Marinkovic K., Dhond R.P., Dale A.M., Glessner M., Carr V., Halgren E. Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing. Neuron 2003, 38(3):487-497.
69. Martin-Loeches M., Nigbur R., Casado P., Hohlfeld A., Sommer W. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish. Brain Research 2006, 1093(1):178-189.
70. Mecklinger A., Schriefers H., Steinhauer K., Friederici A.D. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and Cognition 1995, 23(4):477-494.
71. Miller G.A., Lutzenberger W., Elbert T. The linked-reference issue in EEG and ERP recording. Journal of Psychophysiology 1991, 5:273-276.
72. Molinaro N., Conrad M., Barber H.A., Carreiras M. On the functional nature of the N400: Contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration. Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 1(1):1-7.
73. Molinaro N., Vespignani F., Job R. A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations. Brain Research 2008, 1228:161-176.
74. Molinaro N., Vespignani F., Zamparelli R., Job R. Why brother and sister are not just siblings: Repair processes in agreement computation. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64(3):211-232.
75. Molinaro N., Kim A., Vespignani F., Job R. Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation. Cognition 2008, 106(2):963-974.
76. Mondini S., Angrilli A., Bisiacchi P., Spironelli C., Marinelli K., Semenza C. Mass and count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on early components. Neuroscience Letters 2008, 430(1):48-53.
77. Munte T.F., Heinze H.J. ERP negativities during syntactic processing of written words. Cognitive Electrophysiology 1994, 211-238. Birkäuser, Boston. H.J. Heinze, T.F. Munte, G.R. Mangun (Eds.).
78. Munte T.F., Matzke M., Johannes S. Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9(3):318-329.
79. Munte T.F., Szentkutia A., Wieringaa B.M., Matzkea M., Johannes S. Human brain potentials to reading syntactic errors in sentences of different complexity. Neuroscience Letters 1997, 235(3):105-108.
80. Neville H.J., Mills D.L., Lawson D.S. Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex 1992, 2(3):244-258.
81. Nevins A., Dillon B., Malhotra S., Phillips C. The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research 2007, 1164:81-94.
82. Osterhout L. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain and Language 1997, 59(3):494-522.
83. Osterhout L. On space, time and language: For the next century, timing is (almost) everything. Brain and Language 2000, 71(1):175-177.
84. Osterhout L., Bersick M., McKinnon R. Brain potentials elicited by words: Word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biological Psychology 1997, 46(2):143-168.
85. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31(6):785-806.
86. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials and language comprehension. Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and Cognition 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.D. Rugg, M.G.H. Coles (Eds.).
87. Osterhout L., McKinnon R., Bersick M., Corey V. On the language-specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8(6):507-526.
88. Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Kim A., Greenwald R., Inoue K. Sentences in the brain: Event-related potentials as real-time reflections of sentence comprehension and language learning. The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and Beyond 2004, Psychology Press, London. M. Carreiras, C. Clifton (Eds.).
89. Osterhout L., McLaughlin J., Pitkanen I., Frenck-Mestre C., Molinaro N. Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A paradigm for exploring the neurocognition of second-language processing. Language Learning 2006, 56(S1):199-230.
90. Osterhout L., Mobley L.A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 1995, 34(6):739-773.
91. Palolahti M., Leinob S., Jokelab M., Koprab K., Paavilainen P. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension. Neuroscience Letters 2005, 384(3):222-227.
92. Penolazzi B., De Vincenzi M., Angrilli A., Job R. Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian who-questions: A study with event-related potentials. Neuroscience Letters 2005, 377(2):91-96.
93. Penolazzi B., Hauk O., Pulvermüller F. Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related potentials. Biological Psychology 2007, 74(3):374-388.
94. Pollard C., Sag I. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar 1994, CSLI Publications and Chicago University Press, Stanford and Chicago.
95. Ritter E. A head-movement approach to construct state noun phrases. Linguistics 1988, 26:909-929.
96. Roehm D., Bornkessel I., Haider H., Schlesewsky M. When case meets agreement: Event-related potential effects for morphology-based conflict resolution in human language comprehension. NeuroReport 2005, 16(8):875-878.
97. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(5):546-550.
98. Sauerland U. On the Semantic Markedness of Phi-features. Phi-theory 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
99. Service E., Helenius P., Maury S., Salmelin R. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19(7):1193-1205.
100. Shlonsky U. The Hierarchical Representation of Agreement. Unpublished manuscript, 1989, available at: http://www.unige.ch/lettres/linguistique/shlonsky/readings/hierarchical.pdf.
101. Silva-Pereyra J.F., Carreiras M. An ERP study of agreement features in Spanish. Brain Research 2007, 1185(14):201-211.
102. Silverstein M. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. Features and Projections 1985, 163-232. Foris, Dordrecht. P. Muysken, H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.).
103. St.George M., Mannes S., Hoffman J.E. Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1994, 6(1):70-83.
104. Steele S. Word order variation: A typological study. Universals of Human Language IV: Syntax 1978, 585-624. Stanford University Press, Stanford. J.H. Greenberg, C.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (Eds.).
105. Streb J., Rosler F., Hennighausen E. Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language 1999, 70(2):273-286.
106. Swaab T.Y., Brown C., Hagoort P. Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: Electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1997, 36(8):737-761.
107. Swaab T.Y., Brown C., Hagoort P. Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: Event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9(1):39-66.
108. Ullman M.T. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2(10):717-726.
109. Ullman M.T., Corkin S., Coppola M., Hickok G., Growdon J.H., Koroshetz W.J., et al. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9(2):266-276.
110. Van Berkum J.J.A., Hagoort P., Brown C.M. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(6):657-671.
111. Van Berkum J.J.A. Understanding sentences in context: What the brain waves can tell us. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17(6):376-380.
112. Van Petten C., Kutas M. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition 1990, 18(4):380-393.
113. Vespignani F, Molinaro N, and Job R. ERP study of parsing strategies during repair. In Tommasi L, and Di Matteo R (Eds), Cross-linguistic Perspectives in Language Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, in preparation.
114. Vos S.H., Friederici A.D. Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: The role of working memory. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 16(1):111-122.
115. Vos S.H., Gunter T.C., Kolk H.H.J., Mulder G. Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 2001, 38(1):41-63.
116. Vosse T., Kempen G.A.M. Syntactic assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and lexicalist grammar. Cognition 2000, 75(2):105-143.
117. Wassenaar M., Brown C.M., Hagoort P. ERP effects of subject-verb agreement violations in patients with Broca's aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(4):553-576.
118. Wassenaar M., Hagoort P. Word-category violations in patients with Broca's aphasia: An ERP study. Brain and Language 2005, 92(2):117-137.
119. Wagers M.W., Lau E., Phillips C. Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 61(2):206-237.
120. Wechsler S. Agreement features. Language and Linguistics Compass 2009, 3(1):384-405.
121. Wicha N.Y.Y., Moreno E.M., Kutas M. Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(7):1272-1288.
122. Zawiszewski A., Friederici A.D. Processing object-verb agreement in canonical and non-canonical word orders in Basque: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Research 2009, 1284:161-179.