Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 376-380

  Van Berkum, Jos J A ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Brain potentials; Communication; Meaning; Prediction; Sentence comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 57649118686     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00609.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Clark, H.H. (1996). (See ss7References). A thorough linguistic and psycholinguistic analysis of comprehension and production in the context of real language use, with strong emphasis on collaborative, social aspects of linguistic communication.
2. Jackendoff, R. (2007). A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2-22. A linguistically grounded, "non-syntactocentric" theory of how comprehenders analyze multiple levels of language structure (e.g., sound, syntax, meaning) simultaneously.
3. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R., (2006). (See ss7References). A thorough review of psycholinguistically relevant ERP effects, primarily aimed at sentence comprehension.
4. Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (Eds.). (2005). Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. A recent overview of behavioral (eye tracking) research on language comprehension in context.
5. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2004). Sentence comprehension in a wider discourse: Can we use ERPs to keep track of things? In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton Jr. (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 229-270). New York: Psychology Press. A review of the pros and cons of using ERPs to study discourse-level comprehension, illustrated with some of the experiments mentioned above.
6. Camblin, C.C., Gordon, P.C. Swaab, T.Y. (2007). The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory & Language, 56, 103 128.
7. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
8. Ditman, T., Holcomb, P.J. Kuperberg, G.R. (2007). The contributions of lexico-semantic and discourse information to the resolution of ambiguous categorical anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 793 827.
9. Federmeier, K.D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491 505.
10. Kuperberg, G.R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23 49.
11. Kutas, M. Federmeier, K.D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463 470.
12. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C. Kluender, R. (2006). Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. In M. Traxler M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 659 724). New York : Elsevier.
13. Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283 308). New York : Academic Press.
14. Nieuwland, M.S., Otten, M. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2007). Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 228 236.
15. Nieuwland, M.S, Petersson, K.M. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2007). On sense and reference: Examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing. NeuroImage, 37, 993 1004.
16. Nieuwland, M.S. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2005). Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 691 701.
17. Nieuwland, M.S. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098 1111.
18. Otten, M. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (2007). What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect. Brain Research, 1153, 166 177.
19. Otten, M. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (in press) Discourse-based anticipation during language processing: Prediction or priming? Discourse Processes.
20. Sanford, A.J. Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382 386.
21. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (in press-a). The electrophysiology of discourse and conversation. In M. Spivey, K. McRae M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
22. Van Berkum, J.J.A. (in press-b). The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantic and pragmatics: From experiment to theory. New York : Palgrave.
23. Van Berkum, J.J.A., Brown, C.M. Hagoort, P. (1999). When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 555 571.
24. Van Berkum, J.J.A., Brown, C.M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V. Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 443 467.
25. Van Berkum, J.J.A., Koornneef, A.W., Otten, M. Nieuwland, M.S. (2007). Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Brain Research, 1146, 158 171.
26. Van Berkum, J.J.A., Van den Brink, D., Tesink, C., Kos, M. Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580 591.