Similarities and differences between phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations in Spanish: An event-related potentials study

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 113-142

  Hinojosa, José A ^a   Martín Loeches, Manuel ^a   Casado, Pilar ^a   Munoz̃, Francisco ^a   Rubia, Francisco J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPAIN; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0038367507     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960143000489     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., & Boland, J. E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 112-130.
2. American Electroencephalographic Society. (1991). Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 3, 38-42.
3. Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain potentials to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
4. Demestre, J., Meltzer, S., García-Albea, J. E., & Vigil, A. (1999). Identifying the null subject: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 293-312.
5. Federmeier, K., & Kutas, M. (1999). Right words and left words: Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 373-392.
6. Frazier, L. (1990). Exploring the architecture of the language-processing system. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 409-433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
8. Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 49, 259-281.
9. Friederici, A. D. (1997). Diagnosis and reanalyses: Two processing aspects the brain may differentiate. In J. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 177-200). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Friederici, A. D., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 157-176.
11. Friederici, A. D., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument-specific information. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 476-507.
12. Friederici, A. D., Mecklinger, A., Spencer, K. M., Steinhauer, K., & Donchin, E. (2001). Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: A spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 305-323.
13. Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger. A. (1996). The temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late ERP effects elicited by syntactic anomalies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 5, 1219-1248.
14. Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183-192.
15. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Frisch, S. (1999). Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory and Cognition, 27, 438-453.
16. Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Gross. M., Say, T., Kleingers, M., Clahsen, H., & Münte, T. F. (1998). Human brain potentials to violations in morphologically complex Italian words. Neuroscience Letters, 241, 83-86.
18. Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing. Psychophysiology, 36, 126-137.
19. Gunter, T. C., Friederici. A. D., & Hahne, A. (1999). Brain responses during sentence reading: Visual input affects central processes. NeuroReport, 10, 3175-3178.
20. Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L.A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660-676.
21. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556-568.
22. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. A (2000a). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530.
23. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000b). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531-1549.
24. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
25. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown, & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194-205.
27. Hahne, A, & Jescheniak, J. D. (2001). What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 199-212.
28. Harris, T., Wexler, K., & Holcomb, P. (2000). An ERP investigation of binding and coreference. Brain and Language, 75, 313-346.
29. Hoen, M., & Dominey, P. F. (2000). ERP analysis of cognitive sequencing: A left anterior negativity related to structural transformation processing. Neuroreport, 11, 3187-3191.
30. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, P., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159-201.
31. King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
32. Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
33. Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2001). Cognitive representations underlying the N400 priming effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 487-490.
34. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 463-470.
35. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition, 11, 539-550.
36. Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Münte, T.F. (2000). Language. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 576-601). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
37. Martín-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Gómez-Jarabo, G., & Rubia, F. J. (1999). The recognition potential: An ERP index of lexical access. Brain and Language, 70, 364-384.
38. Martín-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., Gómez-Jarabo, G., & Rubia, F. J. (2001). An early electrophysiological sign of semantic processing in basal extrastriate areas. Psychophysiology, 38, 114-125.
39. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
40. McKinnon, R., & Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 495-523.
41. Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and Cognition, 23, 477-494.
42. Münte, T. F., Heinze, H., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B. M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia, 36, 217-226.
43. Münte, T. F., Szentkuti, A., Wieringa, B. M., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997). Human brain potentials to reading syntactic errors in sentences of different complexity. Neuroscience Letters, 235, 105-108.
44. Nakagome, K., Takazawa, S., Kanno, O., Hagiwara, H., Nakajima, H., Itoh, K., & Koshida, I. (2001). A topographical study of ERP correlates of semantic and syntactic violations in the Japanese language using the multichannel EEG system. Psychophysiology, 38, 304-315.
45. Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
46. Oken, B. S., & Chiappa, K. H. (1986). Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Annals of Neurology, 19 493-494.
47. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
48. Osterhout, L., & Hagoort, P. (1999). A superficial resemblance doesn't necessarily mean that you're part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King, and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 1-14.
49. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
50. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 413-438.
51. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
52. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 4, 786-803.
53. Osterhout, L., McKinnon, R., Bersick, M., & Corey, V. (1996). On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 507-526.
54. Penke, M., Weyerts, H., Gross, M., Zander, E., Münte, T. F., & Clahsen, A. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: An ERP study of German verb inflections. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 37-52.
55. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleó, C., Zaake, W., & Münte, T. F. (2001). Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 47-58.
56. Rösler, F., Pütz, P., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345-362.
57. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Preelich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artefacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.
58. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191-196.
59. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
60. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001a). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38, 41-63.
61. Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Schriefers, H., & Friederici, A. D. (2001b). Syntactic parsing and working memory: The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 65-103.
62. Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36, 559-570.
63. West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 363-375.
64. Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Dohrn, U., Clahsen, H, & Münte, T. F. (1997). Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German nouns plurals. NeuroReport, 8, 957-962.