Gender or genders agreement?

The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 309-327

  Barber, Horacio ^a   Salillas, Elena ^a   Carreiras, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49549109225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203509050     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2003). Integrating gender and number Information in Spanish word pairs: An ERP study. Cortex, 39.
2. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 922-1004.
3. Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1993). The use of superficial and meaning-based representations in interpreting pronouns: Evidence from Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 93-116.
4. Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpect: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
5. Demestre, J., Meltzer, S., García-Albea, J. E., & Vigil, A. (1999). Identifying the null subject:Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(3), 293-312.
6. Deutsch, A., & Bentin, S. (2001). Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew: Evidence from ERPs and eyes movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 200-224.
7. Deutsch, A., Bentin, S., & Katz, L. (1999). Semantic influence on processing syntactic rules of agreement: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 515-535.
8. Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing:a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259-281.
9. Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., Erhlich, M. F., & Carreiras, M. (1995). Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: New evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 41-62.
10. Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
11. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556-568.
12. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 6, 715-728.
13. Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463-470.
15. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
16. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
17. Münte, T. F., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997) Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 318-329.
18. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
19. Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., & McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory and Cognition, 25(3), 273-285.
20. Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
21. Schmitt, B. M., Lamers, M., & Münte, T. (2002). Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 333-346.
22. Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences, Psychophysiology, 36, 559-570.
23. Wicha, N. Y., Moreno, E., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39.