Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish

Brain Research

Volumn 1093, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 178-189

  Martín Loeches, Manuel ^a,b   Nigbur, Roland ^a,c   Casado, Pilar ^a   Hohlfeld, Annette ^c   Sommer, Werner ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

LAN; N400; P600; Semantic processing; Sentence processing; Syntactic processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COMPREHENSION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33745428700     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.094     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ainsworth-Darnell K., Shulman H.G., and Boland J.E. Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: evidence from event-related potentials. J. Mem. Lang. 38 (1998) 112-130
2. Berwick R., and Weinberg A. The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance (1984), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
3. Chwilla D.J., Brown C.M., and Hagoort P. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology 32 (1995) 274-285
4. Coulson S., King J.W., and Kutas M. Expect the unexpected: event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Lang. Cogn. Processes 13 (1998) 21-58
5. Dowty D. On the semantic content of the notion 'thematic role'. In: Partee B., Turner R., and Chierchia G. (Eds). Properties, Types and Meaning, Semantic Issues vol. 2 (1988), Kluwer, Dordrecht 69-130
6. Federmeier K.D., Kluender R., and Kutas M. Aligning linguistic and brain views on language comprehension. In: Zani A., and Proverbio A.M. (Eds). The Cognitive Electrophysiology of Mind and Brain (2003), Academic Press, San Diego 143-168
7. Ferreira F., and Clifton Jr. C. The independence of syntactic processing. J. Mem. Lang. 25 (1986) 348-368
8. Frazier L. Sentence processing: a tutorial review. In: Coltheart M. (Ed). Attention and Performance XII (1987), Erlbaum, London 559-585
9. Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 78-84
10. Friederici A.D. Event-related brain potential studies in language. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. 4 (2004) 466-470
11. Friederici A.D., and Mecklinger A. Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: first-pass and second-pass parsing processes. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 25 (1996) 157-176
12. Friederici A.D., Steinhauer K., and Frisch S. Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Mem. Cogn. 27 (1999) 438-453
13. Friederici A.D., Gunter T.C., and Mauth K. The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport 15 (2004) 165-169
14. Frisch S., Schlesewsky M., Saddy D., and Alpermann A. The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity. Cognition 85 (2002) B83-B92
15. Gibson E. Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 (1998) 1-76
16. Gibson E. The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Miyashita Y., Marantz P., and O'Neil W. (Eds). Image, Language, Brain (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 95-126
17. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., and Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 55 (1983) 468-484
18. Gunter T.C., Stowe L.A., and Mulder G. When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 660-676
19. Gunter T.C., Friederici A.D., and Schriefers H. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 556-568
20. Hagoort P. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15 (2003) 883-899
21. Hahne A., and Friederici A.D. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cogn. Brain Res. 13 (2002) 339-356
22. Hohlfeld A., Sangals J., and Sommer W. Effects of additional tasks on language perception: an ERP investigation. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn., Mem., Cogn. 30 (2004) 1012-1025
23. Jackendoff R. Foundations of language: brain. Meaning, Grammar, Evolution (2002), OUP, Oxford, UK
24. Johnson-Laird P. Mental Models (1983), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Just M.A., and Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol. Rev. 99 (1992) 122-149
26. Kim A., and Osterhout L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials. J. Mem. Lang. 52 (2005) 205-225
27. Kutas M., and Besson M. Electrical signs of language in the brain. In: Fuchs C., and Roberts S. (Eds). Language Diversity and Cognitive Representations (1999), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 159-178
28. Kutas M., and Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207 (1980) 203-2005
29. Kutas M., and King J.W. The potentials for basic sentence processing: differentiating integrative processes. In: Ikeda I., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Attention and Performance (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 501-546
30. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., Kluender, R., in press. Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd Edition. M.A. Gernsbacher, M. Traxler, eds. Elsevier, New York.
31. Marslen-Wilson W.D., and Tyler L.K. Against modularity. In: Gareld J.L. (Ed). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 37-62
32. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 203-208
33. McClelland J.L., St John M., and Taraban R. Sentence comprehension: a parallel distributed processing approach. Lang. Cogn. Processes 4 (1989) 287-336
34. Münte T.F., Heinze H.J., Matzke M., Wieringa B.M., and Johannes S. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 217-226
35. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
36. Osterhout L., and Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J. Mem. Lang. 31 (1992) 785-806
37. Osterhout L., and Nicol J. On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Lang. Cogn. Processes 14 (1999) 283-317
38. Palolahti M., Leino S., Jokela M., Kopra K., and Paavilainen P. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension. Neurosci. Lett. 384 (2005) 222-227
39. Perrin F., Bertrand O., and Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72 (1989) 184-187
40. Rugg M.D., and Coles M.G.H. The ERP and cognitive psychology: conceptual issues. In: Rugg M.D., and Coles M.G.H. (Eds). Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition (1995), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 27-39
41. Sebastián N. LEXESP, Léxico Informatizado del Español (2000), Ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona
42. Townsend D.J., and Bever T.G. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
43. Trueswell J.C., Tannenhaus M.K., and Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences of parsing: use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. J. Mem. Lang. 33 (1994) 285-318
44. Ungerleider L.G., and Haxby J.V. "What" and "where" in the human brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4 (1994) 157-165
45. Urbach T.P., and Kutas M. The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 791-808
46. Vos S.H., Gunter T.C., Kolk H.H.J., and Mulder G. Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 41-63
47. Wicha N.Y.Y., Bates E., Moreno E.M., and Kutas M. Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences. Neurosci. Lett. 346 (2003) 165-168
48. Wicha N.Y.Y., Moreno E.M., and Kutas M. Expecting gender: an event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex 39 (2003) 483-508
49. Wicha N.Y.Y., Moreno E.M., and Kutas M. Anticipating words and their gender: an event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 1272-1288
50. Wilding, E.L., in press. On the practice of rescaling scalp-recorded event-related potentials. Biol. Psychol.
51. Ye Z., Luo Y., Friederici A.D., and Zhou X. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res. 1071 (2006) 186-196