Differences between the morphology of gender and number: Evidence from establishing coreferences

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 537-553

  De Vincenzi, Marica ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038120446     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023272511427     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cacciari, C., Carreiras, M., & Barbolini-Cionini, C. (1997). When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 517-532.
2. Chomsky, N., (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
3. Corbett, A. T., & Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory and Cognition, 11, 283-294.
4. De Vincenzi, M., & Di Domenico. (1999). A distinction among phi-features: The role of gender and number in the retrieval of pronoun antecedents. In E. Di Domenico & M. De Vincenzi (Eds.), Gender and number in normal and impaired language processing, Special Issue of Rivista di Linguistica, 11(1), In press.
5. Di Domenico, E. (1997). Per una teoria del genere grammaticale. Padova: Unipress.
6. Faussart, C., Jakubowicz, C., & Costes, M. (1999). Gender and number processing in spoken French and Spanish. In E. Di Domenico & M. De Vincenzi (Eds.), Gender and number in normal and impaired language processing. Special Issue of Rivista di Linguistica, 11(1), In press.
7. Frazier, L. (1985). Modularity and the representational hypothesis. Proceedings of NELS 12, Amherst, MA: GLSA.
8. Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, vol. 1: Speech and talk. London: Academic Press.
9. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 32, 99-156.
10. Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Universals of human language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Igoa, J., Garcia-Albea, J. E. & Sanchez-Casas, R. (1999). Gender-number dissociations in sentence production in Spanish. In E. Di Domenico & M. De Vincenzi (Eds.), Gender and Number in Normal and Impaired Language Processing. Special Issue of Rivista di Linguistica, 11(1), In press.
12. Kimball J. P. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15-47.
13. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. MacDonald, M. C., Perlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
15. Nicol, J. L. (1988). Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
16. Ritter, E. (1993). Where's Gender? Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 795-803.
17. Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1982). The resolution of discourse anaphor: Some on-line studies. Text, 2, 263-291.
18. Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When sex and syntax goes hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, In press.